Ville noticed that the last mocs entry is used unconditionally by the HW when it performs cache evictions, and noted that while the value is not meant to be writable by the driver, we should program it to a reasonable value nevertheless.
As it turns out, we can change the value of mocs:63 and the value we were programming into it would cause hard hangs in conjunction with atomic operations.
Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2707 Fixes: 3bbaba0ceaa2 ("drm/i915: Added Programming of the MOCS") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Cc: Jason Ekstrand jason@jlekstrand.net Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.3+ --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c index 254873e1646e..6ae512847f64 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c @@ -131,7 +131,10 @@ static const struct drm_i915_mocs_entry skl_mocs_table[] = { GEN9_MOCS_ENTRIES, MOCS_ENTRY(I915_MOCS_CACHED, LE_3_WB | LE_TC_2_LLC_ELLC | LE_LRUM(3), - L3_3_WB) + L3_3_WB), + MOCS_ENTRY(63, + LE_3_WB | LE_TC_1_LLC | LE_LRUM(3), + L3_1_UC) };
/* NOTE: the LE_TGT_CACHE is not used on Broxton */
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 10:55:39AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
Ville noticed that the last mocs entry is used unconditionally by the HW when it performs cache evictions, and noted that while the value is not meant to be writable by the driver, we should program it to a reasonable value nevertheless.
As it turns out, we can change the value of mocs:63 and the value we were programming into it would cause hard hangs in conjunction with atomic operations.
Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2707 Fixes: 3bbaba0ceaa2 ("drm/i915: Added Programming of the MOCS") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Cc: Jason Ekstrand jason@jlekstrand.net Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.3+
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c index 254873e1646e..6ae512847f64 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c @@ -131,7 +131,10 @@ static const struct drm_i915_mocs_entry skl_mocs_table[] = { GEN9_MOCS_ENTRIES, MOCS_ENTRY(I915_MOCS_CACHED, LE_3_WB | LE_TC_2_LLC_ELLC | LE_LRUM(3),
L3_3_WB)
L3_3_WB),
- MOCS_ENTRY(63,
Wonder if we should give these magic MOCS entries actual names?
Anyways, matches my reading of the spec Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
LE_3_WB | LE_TC_1_LLC | LE_LRUM(3),
L3_1_UC)
}; /* NOTE: the LE_TGT_CACHE is not used on Broxton */ -- 2.20.1
Ville noticed that the last mocs entry is used unconditionally by the HW when it performs cache evictions, and noted that while the value is not meant to be writable by the driver, we should program it to a reasonable value nevertheless.
As it turns out, we can change the value of mocs:63 and the value we were programming into it would cause hard hangs in conjunction with atomic operations.
v2: Add details from bspec about how it is used by HW
Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2707 Fixes: 3bbaba0ceaa2 ("drm/i915: Added Programming of the MOCS") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Cc: Jason Ekstrand jason@jlekstrand.net Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.3+ --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c index 254873e1646e..26cedde80476 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c @@ -131,7 +131,19 @@ static const struct drm_i915_mocs_entry skl_mocs_table[] = { GEN9_MOCS_ENTRIES, MOCS_ENTRY(I915_MOCS_CACHED, LE_3_WB | LE_TC_2_LLC_ELLC | LE_LRUM(3), - L3_3_WB) + L3_3_WB), + + /* + * mocs:63 + * - used by the L3 for all its evictions. + * Thus it is expected to allow LLC cacheability to enable coherent + * flows to be maintained. + * - used to force L3 uncachable cycles. + * Thus it is expected to make the surce L3 uncacheable. + */ + MOCS_ENTRY(63, + LE_3_WB | LE_TC_1_LLC | LE_LRUM(3), + L3_1_UC) };
/* NOTE: the LE_TGT_CACHE is not used on Broxton */
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 02:08:41PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
Ville noticed that the last mocs entry is used unconditionally by the HW when it performs cache evictions, and noted that while the value is not meant to be writable by the driver, we should program it to a reasonable value nevertheless.
As it turns out, we can change the value of mocs:63 and the value we were programming into it would cause hard hangs in conjunction with atomic operations.
v2: Add details from bspec about how it is used by HW
Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2707 Fixes: 3bbaba0ceaa2 ("drm/i915: Added Programming of the MOCS") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Cc: Jason Ekstrand jason@jlekstrand.net Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.3+
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c index 254873e1646e..26cedde80476 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c @@ -131,7 +131,19 @@ static const struct drm_i915_mocs_entry skl_mocs_table[] = { GEN9_MOCS_ENTRIES, MOCS_ENTRY(I915_MOCS_CACHED, LE_3_WB | LE_TC_2_LLC_ELLC | LE_LRUM(3),
L3_3_WB)
L3_3_WB),
- /*
* mocs:63
* - used by the L3 for all its evictions.
* Thus it is expected to allow LLC cacheability to enable coherent
* flows to be maintained.
* - used to force L3 uncachable cycles.
* Thus it is expected to make the surce L3 uncacheable.
"surce"?
*/
- MOCS_ENTRY(63,
LE_3_WB | LE_TC_1_LLC | LE_LRUM(3),
L3_1_UC)
}; /* NOTE: the LE_TGT_CACHE is not used on Broxton */ -- 2.20.1
I just pulled drm-tip with both this and "drm/i915/gt: Declare gen9 has 64 mocs entries!" and the hang persists. You really had my hopes up there.... I think we need to merge the L3$ disable patch.
--Jason
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 9:50 AM Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 02:08:41PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
Ville noticed that the last mocs entry is used unconditionally by the HW when it performs cache evictions, and noted that while the value is not meant to be writable by the driver, we should program it to a reasonable value nevertheless.
As it turns out, we can change the value of mocs:63 and the value we were programming into it would cause hard hangs in conjunction with atomic operations.
v2: Add details from bspec about how it is used by HW
Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2707 Fixes: 3bbaba0ceaa2 ("drm/i915: Added Programming of the MOCS") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Cc: Jason Ekstrand jason@jlekstrand.net Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.3+
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c index 254873e1646e..26cedde80476 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c @@ -131,7 +131,19 @@ static const struct drm_i915_mocs_entry skl_mocs_table[] = { GEN9_MOCS_ENTRIES, MOCS_ENTRY(I915_MOCS_CACHED, LE_3_WB | LE_TC_2_LLC_ELLC | LE_LRUM(3),
L3_3_WB)
L3_3_WB),
/*
* mocs:63
* - used by the L3 for all its evictions.
* Thus it is expected to allow LLC cacheability to enable coherent
* flows to be maintained.
* - used to force L3 uncachable cycles.
* Thus it is expected to make the surce L3 uncacheable.
"surce"?
*/
MOCS_ENTRY(63,
LE_3_WB | LE_TC_1_LLC | LE_LRUM(3),
L3_1_UC)
};
/* NOTE: the LE_TGT_CACHE is not used on Broxton */
2.20.1
-- Ville Syrjälä Intel
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org