On 11/24/21 8:28 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 11/23/21 8:27 PM, Daniel Black wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 7:55 AM Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk wrote:
On 11/14/21 1:33 PM, Daniel Black wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 10:44 AM Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk wrote:
Alright, give this one a go if you can. Against -git, but will apply to 5.15 as well.
Works. Thank you very much.
https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-26674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
Tested-by: Marko Mäkelä marko.makela@mariadb.com
The patch is already upstream (and in the 5.15 stable queue), and I provided 5.14 patches too.
Jens,
I'm getting the same reproducer on 5.14.20 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2018882#c3) though the backport change logs indicate 5.14.19 has the patch.
Anything missing?
We might also need another patch that isn't in stable, I'm attaching it here. Any chance you can run 5.14.20/21 with this applied? If not, I'll do some sanity checking here and push it to -stable.
Looks good to me - Greg, would you mind queueing this up for 5.14-stable?
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 09:10:25AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 11/24/21 8:28 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 11/23/21 8:27 PM, Daniel Black wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 7:55 AM Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk wrote:
On 11/14/21 1:33 PM, Daniel Black wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 10:44 AM Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk wrote:
Alright, give this one a go if you can. Against -git, but will apply to 5.15 as well.
Works. Thank you very much.
https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-26674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
Tested-by: Marko Mäkelä marko.makela@mariadb.com
The patch is already upstream (and in the 5.15 stable queue), and I provided 5.14 patches too.
Jens,
I'm getting the same reproducer on 5.14.20 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2018882#c3) though the backport change logs indicate 5.14.19 has the patch.
Anything missing?
We might also need another patch that isn't in stable, I'm attaching it here. Any chance you can run 5.14.20/21 with this applied? If not, I'll do some sanity checking here and push it to -stable.
Looks good to me - Greg, would you mind queueing this up for 5.14-stable?
5.14 is end-of-life and not getting any more releases (the front page of kernel.org should show that.)
If this needs to go anywhere else, please let me know.
thanks,
greg k-h
On 11/24/21 9:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 09:10:25AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 11/24/21 8:28 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 11/23/21 8:27 PM, Daniel Black wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 7:55 AM Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk wrote:
On 11/14/21 1:33 PM, Daniel Black wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 10:44 AM Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk wrote: > > Alright, give this one a go if you can. Against -git, but will apply to > 5.15 as well.
Works. Thank you very much.
https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-26674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
Tested-by: Marko Mäkelä marko.makela@mariadb.com
The patch is already upstream (and in the 5.15 stable queue), and I provided 5.14 patches too.
Jens,
I'm getting the same reproducer on 5.14.20 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2018882#c3) though the backport change logs indicate 5.14.19 has the patch.
Anything missing?
We might also need another patch that isn't in stable, I'm attaching it here. Any chance you can run 5.14.20/21 with this applied? If not, I'll do some sanity checking here and push it to -stable.
Looks good to me - Greg, would you mind queueing this up for 5.14-stable?
5.14 is end-of-life and not getting any more releases (the front page of kernel.org should show that.)
Oh, well I guess that settles that...
If this needs to go anywhere else, please let me know.
Should be fine, previous 5.10 isn't affected and 5.15 is fine too as it already has the patch.
Hi Jens,
Looks good to me - Greg, would you mind queueing this up for 5.14-stable?
5.14 is end-of-life and not getting any more releases (the front page of kernel.org should show that.)
Oh, well I guess that settles that...
If this needs to go anywhere else, please let me know.
Should be fine, previous 5.10 isn't affected and 5.15 is fine too as it already has the patch.
Are 5.11 and 5.13 are affected, these are hwe kernels for ubuntu, I may need to open a bug for them...
Thanks! metze
On 11/24/21 3:52 PM, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
Hi Jens,
Looks good to me - Greg, would you mind queueing this up for 5.14-stable?
5.14 is end-of-life and not getting any more releases (the front page of kernel.org should show that.)
Oh, well I guess that settles that...
If this needs to go anywhere else, please let me know.
Should be fine, previous 5.10 isn't affected and 5.15 is fine too as it already has the patch.
Are 5.11 and 5.13 are affected, these are hwe kernels for ubuntu, I may need to open a bug for them...
Please do, then we can help get the appropriate patches lined up for 5.11/13. They should need the same set, basically what ended up in 5.14 plus the one I posted today.
Am 25.11.21 um 01:58 schrieb Jens Axboe:
On 11/24/21 3:52 PM, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
Hi Jens,
Looks good to me - Greg, would you mind queueing this up for 5.14-stable?
5.14 is end-of-life and not getting any more releases (the front page of kernel.org should show that.)
Oh, well I guess that settles that...
If this needs to go anywhere else, please let me know.
Should be fine, previous 5.10 isn't affected and 5.15 is fine too as it already has the patch.
Are 5.11 and 5.13 are affected, these are hwe kernels for ubuntu, I may need to open a bug for them...
Please do, then we can help get the appropriate patches lined up for 5.11/13. They should need the same set, basically what ended up in 5.14 plus the one I posted today.
Ok, I've created https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952222
Let's see what happens...
metze
On 11/25/21 9:35 AM, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
Am 25.11.21 um 01:58 schrieb Jens Axboe:
On 11/24/21 3:52 PM, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
Hi Jens,
Looks good to me - Greg, would you mind queueing this up for 5.14-stable?
5.14 is end-of-life and not getting any more releases (the front page of kernel.org should show that.)
Oh, well I guess that settles that...
If this needs to go anywhere else, please let me know.
Should be fine, previous 5.10 isn't affected and 5.15 is fine too as it already has the patch.
Are 5.11 and 5.13 are affected, these are hwe kernels for ubuntu, I may need to open a bug for them...
Please do, then we can help get the appropriate patches lined up for 5.11/13. They should need the same set, basically what ended up in 5.14 plus the one I posted today.
Ok, I've created https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952222
Let's see what happens...
Let me know if I can help, should probably prepare a set for 5.11-stable and 5.13-stable, but I don't know if the above kernels already have some patches applied past last stable release of each...
Hi Jens,
Looks good to me - Greg, would you mind queueing this up for 5.14-stable?
5.14 is end-of-life and not getting any more releases (the front page of kernel.org should show that.)
Oh, well I guess that settles that...
If this needs to go anywhere else, please let me know.
Should be fine, previous 5.10 isn't affected and 5.15 is fine too as it already has the patch.
Are 5.11 and 5.13 are affected, these are hwe kernels for ubuntu, I may need to open a bug for them...
Please do, then we can help get the appropriate patches lined up for 5.11/13. They should need the same set, basically what ended up in 5.14 plus the one I posted today.
Ok, I've created https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952222
At least for 5.14 the patch is included in
https://git.launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux-oem/+git/fo...
https://git.launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux-oem/+git/fo...
apt-get install -V -t focal-proposed linux-oem-20.04d linux-tools-oem-20.04d installs linux-image-5.14.0-1023-oem (5.14.0-1023.25)
Do we have any reproducer I can use to reproduce the problem and demonstrate the bug if fixed?
Thanks! metze
Stefan,
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 10:01 AM Stefan Metzmacher metze@samba.org wrote:
Ok, I've created https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952222
At least for 5.14 the patch is included in
https://git.launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux-oem/+git/fo...
https://git.launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux-oem/+git/fo...
apt-get install -V -t focal-proposed linux-oem-20.04d linux-tools-oem-20.04d installs linux-image-5.14.0-1023-oem (5.14.0-1023.25)
Thanks!
Do we have any reproducer I can use to reproduce the problem and demonstrate the bug if fixed?
The original container and test from https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/CABVffEOpuViC9OyOuZg28sRfGK4GRc8cV0CnkOU... will be sufficient.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:22 AM Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk wrote:
On 11/24/21 9:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 09:10:25AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 11/24/21 8:28 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 11/23/21 8:27 PM, Daniel Black wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 7:55 AM Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk wrote:
I'm getting the same reproducer on 5.14.20 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2018882#c3) though the backport change logs indicate 5.14.19 has the patch.
Anything missing?
We might also need another patch that isn't in stable, I'm attaching it here. Any chance you can run 5.14.20/21 with this applied? If not, I'll do some sanity checking here and push it to -stable.
Looks good to me - Greg, would you mind queueing this up for 5.14-stable?
5.14 is end-of-life and not getting any more releases (the front page of kernel.org should show that.)
Oh, well I guess that settles that...
Certainly does. Thanks for looking and finding the patch.
If this needs to go anywhere else, please let me know.
Should be fine, previous 5.10 isn't affected and 5.15 is fine too as it already has the patch.
Thank you
https://github.com/MariaDB/server/commit/de7db5517de11a58d57d2a41d0bc6f38b6f...
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 9:52 AM Stefan Metzmacher metze@samba.org wrote:
Are 5.11 and 5.13 are affected,
Yes.
these are hwe kernels for ubuntu, I may need to open a bug for them...
Yes please.
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Daniel Black -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Jens Axboe -
Stefan Metzmacher