The patch titled Subject: mm/MADV_COLLAPSE: catch !none !huge !bad pmd lookups has been added to the -mm mm-hotfixes-unstable branch. Its filename is mm-madv_collapse-catch-none-huge-bad-pmd-lookups.patch

This patch will shortly appear at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches...

This patch will later appear in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm and is updated there every 2-3 working days

------------------------------------------------------ From: "Zach O'Keefe" zokeefe@google.com Subject: mm/MADV_COLLAPSE: catch !none !huge !bad pmd lookups Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 14:53:58 -0800

In commit 34488399fa08 ("mm/madvise: add file and shmem support to MADV_COLLAPSE") we make the following change to find_pmd_or_thp_or_none():

- if (!pmd_present(pmde)) - return SCAN_PMD_NULL; + if (pmd_none(pmde)) + return SCAN_PMD_NONE;

This was for-use by MADV_COLLAPSE file/shmem codepaths, where MADV_COLLAPSE might identify a pte-mapped hugepage, only to have khugepaged race-in, free the pte table, and clear the pmd. Such codepaths include:

A) If we find a suitably-aligned compound page of order HPAGE_PMD_ORDER already in the pagecache. B) In retract_page_tables(), if we fail to grab mmap_lock for the target mm/address.

In these cases, collapse_pte_mapped_thp() really does expect a none (not just !present) pmd, and we want to suitably identify that case separate from the case where no pmd is found, or it's a bad-pmd (of course, many things could happen once we drop mmap_lock, and the pmd could plausibly undergo multiple transitions due to intervening fault, split, etc). Regardless, the code is prepared install a huge-pmd only when the existing pmd entry is either a genuine pte-table-mapping-pmd, or the none-pmd.

However, the commit introduces a logical hole; namely, that we've allowed !none- && !huge- && !bad-pmds to be classified as genuine pte-table-mapping-pmds. One such example that could leak through are swap entries. The pmd values aren't checked again before use in pte_offset_map_lock(), which is expecting nothing less than a genuine pte-table-mapping-pmd.

We want to put back the !pmd_present() check (below the pmd_none() check), but need to be careful to deal with subtleties in pmd transitions and treatments by various arch.

The issue is that __split_huge_pmd_locked() temporarily clears the present bit (or otherwise marks the entry as invalid), but pmd_present() and pmd_trans_huge() still need to return true while the pmd is in this transitory state. For example, x86's pmd_present() also checks the _PAGE_PSE , riscv's version also checks the _PAGE_LEAF bit, and arm64 also checks a PMD_PRESENT_INVALID bit.

Covering all 4 cases for x86 (all checks done on the same pmd value):

1) pmd_present() && pmd_trans_huge() All we actually know here is that the PSE bit is set. Either: a) We aren't racing with __split_huge_page(), and PRESENT or PROTNONE is set. => huge-pmd b) We are currently racing with __split_huge_page(). The danger here is that we proceed as-if we have a huge-pmd, but really we are looking at a pte-mapping-pmd. So, what is the risk of this danger?

The only relevant path is:

madvise_collapse() -> collapse_pte_mapped_thp()

Where we might just incorrectly report back "success", when really the memory isn't pmd-backed. This is fine, since split could happen immediately after (actually) successful madvise_collapse(). So, it should be safe to just assume huge-pmd here.

2) pmd_present() && !pmd_trans_huge() Either: a) PSE not set and either PRESENT or PROTNONE is. => pte-table-mapping pmd (or PROT_NONE) b) devmap. This routine can be called immediately after unlocking/locking mmap_lock -- or called with no locks held (see khugepaged_scan_mm_slot()), so previous VMA checks have since been invalidated.

3) !pmd_present() && pmd_trans_huge() Not possible.

4) !pmd_present() && !pmd_trans_huge() Neither PRESENT nor PROTNONE set => not present

I've checked all archs that implement pmd_trans_huge() (arm64, riscv, powerpc, longarch, x86, mips, s390) and this logic roughly translates (though devmap treatment is unique to x86 and powerpc, and (3) doesn't necessarily hold in general -- but that doesn't matter since !pmd_present() always takes failure path).

Also, add a comment above find_pmd_or_thp_or_none() to help future travelers reason about the validity of the code; namely, the possible mutations that might happen out from under us, depending on how mmap_lock is held (if at all).

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230125225358.2576151-1-zokeefe@google.com Fixes: 34488399fa08 ("mm/madvise: add file and shmem support to MADV_COLLAPSE") Signed-off-by: Zach O'Keefe zokeefe@google.com Reported-by: Hugh Dickins hughd@google.com Cc: Yang Shi shy828301@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org ---

--- a/mm/khugepaged.c~mm-madv_collapse-catch-none-huge-bad-pmd-lookups +++ a/mm/khugepaged.c @@ -847,6 +847,10 @@ static int hugepage_vma_revalidate(struc return SCAN_SUCCEED; }

+/* + * See pmd_trans_unstable() for how the result may change out from + * underneath us, even if we hold mmap_lock in read. + */ static int find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address, pmd_t **pmd) @@ -865,8 +869,12 @@ static int find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(struc #endif if (pmd_none(pmde)) return SCAN_PMD_NONE; + if (!pmd_present(pmde)) + return SCAN_PMD_NULL; if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde)) return SCAN_PMD_MAPPED; + if (pmd_devmap(pmde)) + return SCAN_PMD_NULL; if (pmd_bad(pmde)) return SCAN_PMD_NULL; return SCAN_SUCCEED; _

Patches currently in -mm which might be from zokeefe@google.com are

mm-madv_collapse-catch-none-huge-bad-pmd-lookups.patch