The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 5.18-stable tree.

I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst.

I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to stable@vger.kernel.org and let me know why this patch should be applied. Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be seen again.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 6533d0c3a86ee1cc74ff37ac92ca597deb87015c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Micka=C3=ABl=20Sala=C3=BCn?= mic@digikod.net Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 18:08:20 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] selftests/landlock: Test landlock_create_ruleset(2) argument check ordering MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Add inval_create_ruleset_arguments, extension of inval_create_ruleset_flags, to also check error ordering for landlock_create_ruleset(2).

This is similar to the previous commit checking landlock_add_rule(2).

Test coverage for security/landlock is 94.4% of 504 lines accorging to gcc/gcov-11.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220506160820.524344-11-mic@digikod.net Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün mic@digikod.net

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c index 21fb33581419..35f64832b869 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c @@ -97,14 +97,17 @@ TEST(abi_version) ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno); }

-TEST(inval_create_ruleset_flags) +/* Tests ordering of syscall argument checks. */ +TEST(create_ruleset_checks_ordering) { const int last_flag = LANDLOCK_CREATE_RULESET_VERSION; const int invalid_flag = last_flag << 1; + int ruleset_fd; const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = { .handled_access_fs = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE, };

+ /* Checks priority for invalid flags. */ ASSERT_EQ(-1, landlock_create_ruleset(NULL, 0, invalid_flag)); ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);

@@ -119,6 +122,22 @@ TEST(inval_create_ruleset_flags) landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), invalid_flag)); ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno); + + /* Checks too big ruleset_attr size. */ + ASSERT_EQ(-1, landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, -1, 0)); + ASSERT_EQ(E2BIG, errno); + + /* Checks too small ruleset_attr size. */ + ASSERT_EQ(-1, landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, 0, 0)); + ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno); + ASSERT_EQ(-1, landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, 1, 0)); + ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno); + + /* Checks valid call. */ + ruleset_fd = + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0); + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd); + ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); }

/* Tests ordering of syscall argument checks. */