Hi,
Can we get this queued up for 5.10-stable? Thanks!
On Thu, 19 May 2022, Jens Axboe wrote:
Hi,
Can we get this queued up for 5.10-stable? Thanks!
From b1da21187de121e2ed2dc2e0c70d5aabce469691 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 06:05:27 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: always grab file table for deferred statx
Lee reports that there's a use-after-free of the process file table. There's an assumption that we don't need the file table for some variants of statx invocation, but that turns out to be false and we end up with not grabbing a reference for the request even if the deferred execution uses it.
Get rid of the REQ_F_NO_FILE_TABLE optimization for statx, and always grab that reference.
This issues doesn't exist upstream since the native workers got introduced with 5.12.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/YoOJ%2FT4QRKC+fAZE@google.com/ Reported-by: Lee Jones lee.jones@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk
Tested-by: Lee Jones lee.jones@linaro.org
fs/io_uring.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c index 4330603eae35..3ecf71151fb1 100644 --- a/fs/io_uring.c +++ b/fs/io_uring.c @@ -4252,12 +4252,8 @@ static int io_statx(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock) struct io_statx *ctx = &req->statx; int ret;
- if (force_nonblock) {
/* only need file table for an actual valid fd */
if (ctx->dfd == -1 || ctx->dfd == AT_FDCWD)
req->flags |= REQ_F_NO_FILE_TABLE;
- if (force_nonblock) return -EAGAIN;
- }
ret = do_statx(ctx->dfd, ctx->filename, ctx->flags, ctx->mask, ctx->buffer);
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org