From: Nathan Chancellor nathan@kernel.org
Currently, scripts/pahole-flags.sh has no formal maintainer. Add it to the BPF section so that patches to it can be properly reviewed and picked up.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor nathan@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko andrii@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220201205624.652313-2-nathan@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Matthias Maennich maennich@google.com --- MAINTAINERS | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 4f50a453e18a..176485e625a0 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -3407,6 +3407,7 @@ F: net/sched/act_bpf.c F: net/sched/cls_bpf.c F: samples/bpf/ F: scripts/bpf_doc.py +F: scripts/pahole-flags.sh F: tools/bpf/ F: tools/lib/bpf/ F: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
Hi,
Thanks for your patch.
FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied.
Rule: 'Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org' or 'commit <sha1> upstream.' Subject: [PATCH 1/5] MAINTAINERS: Add scripts/pahole-flags.sh to BPF section Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20230222112141.278066-2-maennich%40google.com
The check is based on https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:21:39AM +0000, maennich@google.com wrote:
From: Nathan Chancellor nathan@kernel.org
Currently, scripts/pahole-flags.sh has no formal maintainer. Add it to the BPF section so that patches to it can be properly reviewed and picked up.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor nathan@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko andrii@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220201205624.652313-2-nathan@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Matthias Maennich maennich@google.com
MAINTAINERS | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 4f50a453e18a..176485e625a0 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -3407,6 +3407,7 @@ F: net/sched/act_bpf.c F: net/sched/cls_bpf.c F: samples/bpf/ F: scripts/bpf_doc.py +F: scripts/pahole-flags.sh F: tools/bpf/ F: tools/lib/bpf/ F: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ -- 2.39.2.637.g21b0678d19-goog
No need for MAINTAINERS updates for older kernels as no one should be making new patches against them, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:26 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:21:39AM +0000, maennich@google.com wrote:
From: Nathan Chancellor nathan@kernel.org
Currently, scripts/pahole-flags.sh has no formal maintainer. Add it to the BPF section so that patches to it can be properly reviewed and picked up.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor nathan@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko andrii@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220201205624.652313-2-nathan@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Matthias Maennich maennich@google.com
MAINTAINERS | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 4f50a453e18a..176485e625a0 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -3407,6 +3407,7 @@ F: net/sched/act_bpf.c F: net/sched/cls_bpf.c F: samples/bpf/ F: scripts/bpf_doc.py +F: scripts/pahole-flags.sh F: tools/bpf/ F: tools/lib/bpf/ F: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ -- 2.39.2.637.g21b0678d19-goog
No need for MAINTAINERS updates for older kernels as no one should be making new patches against them, right?
This one is optional, but it makes the next one apply cleanly and I picked the entire series.
Cheers, Matthias
thanks,
greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
kernel test robot -
maennich＠google.com -
Matthias Männich