Hi,
I am running kernel 6.1 on a system with a mv88e6320 and can easily trigger a flood of "mv88e6085 30be0000.ethernet-1:00: VTU member violation for vid 10, source port 5" messages.
When this happens, the Ethernet audio that passes through the switch causes a loud noise in the speaker.
Backporting the following commits to 6.1 solves the problem:
4bf24ad09bc0 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: read FID when handling ATU violations") 8646384d80f3 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: replace ATU violation prints with trace points") 9e3d9ae52b56 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: replace VTU violation prints with trace points")
Please apply them to 6.1-stable tree.
Thanks,
Fabio Estevam
Hi Fabio,
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:51:35AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi,
I am running kernel 6.1 on a system with a mv88e6320 and can easily trigger a flood of "mv88e6085 30be0000.ethernet-1:00: VTU member violation for vid 10, source port 5" messages.
When this happens, the Ethernet audio that passes through the switch causes a loud noise in the speaker.
Backporting the following commits to 6.1 solves the problem:
4bf24ad09bc0 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: read FID when handling ATU violations") 8646384d80f3 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: replace ATU violation prints with trace points") 9e3d9ae52b56 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: replace VTU violation prints with trace points")
Please apply them to 6.1-stable tree.
Thanks,
Fabio Estevam
For my information, is there any relationship between the audio samples that (presumably) get packet drops resulting in noise, and the traffic getting VTU member violations? In other words, is the audio traffic sent using VID 10 on switch port 5?
I don't quite understand, since VLAN-filtered traffic should be dropped, what is the reason why the trace point patches would help. My only explanation is that the audio traffic passing through the switch *also* passes through the CPU, and the trace points reduce CPU load caused by an unrelated (and rogue) traffic stream.
If this isn't the case, and you see VTU violations as part of normal operation, I would say that's a different problem for which we would need more details.
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 06:21:58PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
Hi Fabio,
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:51:35AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi,
I am running kernel 6.1 on a system with a mv88e6320 and can easily trigger a flood of "mv88e6085 30be0000.ethernet-1:00: VTU member violation for vid 10, source port 5" messages.
When this happens, the Ethernet audio that passes through the switch causes a loud noise in the speaker.
Backporting the following commits to 6.1 solves the problem:
4bf24ad09bc0 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: read FID when handling ATU violations") 8646384d80f3 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: replace ATU violation prints with trace points") 9e3d9ae52b56 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: replace VTU violation prints with trace points")
Please apply them to 6.1-stable tree.
Thanks,
Fabio Estevam
For my information, is there any relationship between the audio samples that (presumably) get packet drops resulting in noise, and the traffic getting VTU member violations? In other words, is the audio traffic sent using VID 10 on switch port 5?
I don't quite understand, since VLAN-filtered traffic should be dropped, what is the reason why the trace point patches would help. My only explanation is that the audio traffic passing through the switch *also* passes through the CPU, and the trace points reduce CPU load caused by an unrelated (and rogue) traffic stream.
If this isn't the case, and you see VTU violations as part of normal operation, I would say that's a different problem for which we would need more details.
Agreed, this sounds like the removal of printk messages is removing the noise, not the actual fix for the reason the printk messages in the first place, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 03:15:19PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 06:21:58PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
Hi Fabio,
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:51:35AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi,
I am running kernel 6.1 on a system with a mv88e6320 and can easily trigger a flood of "mv88e6085 30be0000.ethernet-1:00: VTU member violation for vid 10, source port 5" messages.
When this happens, the Ethernet audio that passes through the switch causes a loud noise in the speaker.
Backporting the following commits to 6.1 solves the problem:
4bf24ad09bc0 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: read FID when handling ATU violations") 8646384d80f3 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: replace ATU violation prints with trace points") 9e3d9ae52b56 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: replace VTU violation prints with trace points")
Please apply them to 6.1-stable tree.
Thanks,
Fabio Estevam
For my information, is there any relationship between the audio samples that (presumably) get packet drops resulting in noise, and the traffic getting VTU member violations? In other words, is the audio traffic sent using VID 10 on switch port 5?
I don't quite understand, since VLAN-filtered traffic should be dropped, what is the reason why the trace point patches would help. My only explanation is that the audio traffic passing through the switch *also* passes through the CPU, and the trace points reduce CPU load caused by an unrelated (and rogue) traffic stream.
If this isn't the case, and you see VTU violations as part of normal operation, I would say that's a different problem for which we would need more details.
Agreed, this sounds like the removal of printk messages is removing the noise, not the actual fix for the reason the printk messages in the first place, right?
But, in looking at the above commits, that makes more sense. I'll go queue these up for now, thanks.
greg k-h
On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 03:16:25PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 03:15:19PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
Agreed, this sounds like the removal of printk messages is removing the noise, not the actual fix for the reason the printk messages in the first place, right?
But, in looking at the above commits, that makes more sense. I'll go queue these up for now, thanks.
greg k-h
No objections there, although that might have just bombed my attempts to find out what is truly going on :)
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Fabio Estevam -
Greg KH -
Vladimir Oltean