Dear stable team (aka Greg)
Please backport
a04ac8273665 ("drm/i915/gt: Fixup tgl mocs for PTE tracking")
Note that this needs
4d8a5cfe3b13 ("drm/i915/gt: Initialize reserved and unspecified MOCS indices")
but that one has already a cc: stable, unfortunately the bugfix didn't. -Daniel
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 05:02:41PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Dear stable team (aka Greg)
Please backport
a04ac8273665 ("drm/i915/gt: Fixup tgl mocs for PTE tracking")
Note that this needs
4d8a5cfe3b13 ("drm/i915/gt: Initialize reserved and unspecified MOCS indices")
but that one has already a cc: stable, unfortunately the bugfix didn't.
Backport to where exactly?
These all seem to be in the 5.9.y tree already, do they need to go further back?
thanks,
greg k-h
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 1:41 PM Greg KH greg@kroah.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 05:02:41PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Dear stable team (aka Greg)
Please backport
a04ac8273665 ("drm/i915/gt: Fixup tgl mocs for PTE tracking")
Note that this needs
4d8a5cfe3b13 ("drm/i915/gt: Initialize reserved and unspecified MOCS indices")
but that one has already a cc: stable, unfortunately the bugfix didn't.
Backport to where exactly?
These all seem to be in the 5.9.y tree already, do they need to go further back?
The 2nd one has cc: stable, so I worried that it might have escaped to more kernels, whereas the first one does not have cc: stable. Maybe the auto-stable picker has figured this out already (first patch does thave the right Fixes: line), I just wanted to make sure we don't end up with kernels with the broken in-between state. -Daniel
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org