In theory overlayfs could support upper layer directly referring to a data layer, but there's no current use case for this.

Originally, when data-only layers were introduced, this wasn't allowed, only introduced by the "datadir+" feture, but without actually handling this case, resuting in an Oops.

Fix by disallowing datadir without lowerdir.

Reported-by: Giuseppe Scrivano gscrivan@redhat.com Fixes: 24e16e385f22 ("ovl: add support for appending lowerdirs one by one") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.7 Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi mszeredi@redhat.com --- fs/overlayfs/super.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c index 86ae6f6da36b..b11094acdd8f 100644 --- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c +++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c @@ -1137,6 +1137,11 @@ static struct ovl_entry *ovl_get_lowerstack(struct super_block *sb, return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); }

+ if (ctx->nr == ctx->nr_data) { + pr_err("at least one non-data lowerdir is required\n"); + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + } + err = -EINVAL; for (i = 0; i < ctx->nr; i++) { l = &ctx->lower[i];