chipidea udc calls usb_udc_vbus_handler from udc_start gadget ops causing a deadlock. Avoid this by offloading usb_udc_vbus_handler processing.
============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 640-rc1-000-devel-00005-gcda3c69ebc14 #1 Not tainted -------------------------------------------
CPU0 ---- lock(&udc->connect_lock); lock(&udc->connect_lock);
DEADLOCK
stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 566 Comm: echo Not tainted 640-rc1-000-devel-00005-gcda3c69ebc14 #1 Hardware name: Freescale iMX7 Dual (Device Tree) unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x70/0xb0 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x924/0x22c4 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x100/0x370 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xa8/0xfb4 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24 mutex_lock_nested from usb_udc_vbus_handler+0x1c/0x60 usb_udc_vbus_handler from ci_udc_start+0x74/0x9c ci_udc_start from gadget_bind_driver+0x130/0x230 gadget_bind_driver from really_probe+0xd8/0x3fc really_probe from __driver_probe_device+0x94/0x1f0 __driver_probe_device from driver_probe_device+0x2c/0xc4 driver_probe_device from __driver_attach+0x114/0x1cc __driver_attach from bus_for_each_dev+0x7c/0xcc bus_for_each_dev from bus_add_driver+0xd4/0x200 bus_add_driver from driver_register+0x7c/0x114 driver_register from usb_gadget_register_driver_owner+0x40/0xe0 usb_gadget_register_driver_owner from gadget_dev_desc_UDC_store+0xd4/0x110 gadget_dev_desc_UDC_store from configfs_write_iter+0xac/0x118 configfs_write_iter from vfs_write+0x1b4/0x40c vfs_write from ksys_write+0x70/0xf8 ksys_write from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Fixes: 0db213ea8eed ("usb: gadget: udc: core: Invoke usb_gadget_connect only when started") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Stephan Gerhold stephan@gerhold.net Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZF4bMptC3Lf2Hnee@gerhold.net/ Reported-by: Francesco Dolcini francesco.dolcini@toradex.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZF4BvgsOyoKxdPFF@francesco-nb.int.toradex.com/ Reported-by: Alistair alistair@alistair23.me Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0cf8c588b701d7cf25ffe1a9217b81716e6a5c51.camel@... Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan badhri@google.com --- drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c index 69041cca5d24..bbcfab50f657 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c @@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ static const struct bus_type gadget_bus_type; * functions. usb_gadget_connect_locked, usb_gadget_disconnect_locked, * usb_udc_connect_control_locked, usb_gadget_udc_start_locked, usb_gadget_udc_stop_locked are * called with this lock held. + * @vbus_events: list head for processing vbus updates on usb_udc_vbus_handler. + * @vbus_events_lock: protects vbus_events list + * @vbus_work: work item that invokes usb_udc_connect_control_locked. * * This represents the internal data structure which is used by the UDC-class * to hold information about udc driver and gadget together. @@ -53,6 +56,19 @@ struct usb_udc { bool vbus; bool started; struct mutex connect_lock; + struct list_head vbus_events; + struct mutex vbus_events_lock; + struct work_struct vbus_work; +}; + +/** + * struct vbus_event - used to notify vbus updates posted through usb_udc_vbus_handler. + * @vbus_on: true when vbus is on. false other wise. + * @node: list node for maintaining a list of pending updates to be processed. + */ +struct vbus_event { + bool vbus_on; + struct list_head node; };
static struct class *udc_class; @@ -1134,6 +1150,23 @@ static int usb_udc_connect_control_locked(struct usb_udc *udc) __must_hold(&udc- return ret; }
+static void vbus_event_work(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct vbus_event *event, *n; + struct usb_udc *udc = container_of(work, struct usb_udc, vbus_work); + + mutex_lock(&udc->vbus_events_lock); + list_for_each_entry_safe(event, n, &udc->vbus_events, node) { + mutex_lock(&udc->connect_lock); + udc->vbus = event->vbus_on; + usb_udc_connect_control_locked(udc); + list_del(&event->node); + kfree(event); + mutex_unlock(&udc->connect_lock); + } + mutex_unlock(&udc->vbus_events_lock); +} + /** * usb_udc_vbus_handler - updates the udc core vbus status, and try to * connect or disconnect gadget @@ -1146,13 +1179,20 @@ static int usb_udc_connect_control_locked(struct usb_udc *udc) __must_hold(&udc- void usb_udc_vbus_handler(struct usb_gadget *gadget, bool status) { struct usb_udc *udc = gadget->udc; + struct vbus_event *vbus_event;
- mutex_lock(&udc->connect_lock); - if (udc) { - udc->vbus = status; - usb_udc_connect_control_locked(udc); - } - mutex_unlock(&udc->connect_lock); + if (!udc) + return; + + vbus_event = kzalloc(sizeof(*vbus_event), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!vbus_event) + return; + + mutex_lock(&udc->vbus_events_lock); + vbus_event->vbus_on = status; + list_add_tail(&vbus_event->node, &udc->vbus_events); + mutex_unlock(&udc->vbus_events_lock); + schedule_work(&udc->vbus_work); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_udc_vbus_handler);
@@ -1379,6 +1419,9 @@ int usb_add_gadget(struct usb_gadget *gadget) udc->gadget = gadget; gadget->udc = udc; mutex_init(&udc->connect_lock); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&udc->vbus_events); + mutex_init(&udc->vbus_events_lock); + INIT_WORK(&udc->vbus_work, vbus_event_work);
udc->started = false;
base-commit: 6bae03b0484b54f699d69339fbec5658e885c224
Hi Francesco, Alistair, Stephan, Bagas, Lucas,
Thanks for sharing the stack traces ! Requesting your help on validating the patch as I dont have the same hardware with me which reproduces the issue. Let me know if you are still seeing the crash.
Thanks, Badhri
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 5:00 AM Badhri Jagan Sridharan badhri@google.com wrote:
chipidea udc calls usb_udc_vbus_handler from udc_start gadget ops causing a deadlock. Avoid this by offloading usb_udc_vbus_handler processing.
============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 640-rc1-000-devel-00005-gcda3c69ebc14 #1 Not tainted
CPU0
lock(&udc->connect_lock); lock(&udc->connect_lock);
DEADLOCK
stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 566 Comm: echo Not tainted 640-rc1-000-devel-00005-gcda3c69ebc14 #1 Hardware name: Freescale iMX7 Dual (Device Tree) unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x70/0xb0 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x924/0x22c4 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x100/0x370 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xa8/0xfb4 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24 mutex_lock_nested from usb_udc_vbus_handler+0x1c/0x60 usb_udc_vbus_handler from ci_udc_start+0x74/0x9c ci_udc_start from gadget_bind_driver+0x130/0x230 gadget_bind_driver from really_probe+0xd8/0x3fc really_probe from __driver_probe_device+0x94/0x1f0 __driver_probe_device from driver_probe_device+0x2c/0xc4 driver_probe_device from __driver_attach+0x114/0x1cc __driver_attach from bus_for_each_dev+0x7c/0xcc bus_for_each_dev from bus_add_driver+0xd4/0x200 bus_add_driver from driver_register+0x7c/0x114 driver_register from usb_gadget_register_driver_owner+0x40/0xe0 usb_gadget_register_driver_owner from gadget_dev_desc_UDC_store+0xd4/0x110 gadget_dev_desc_UDC_store from configfs_write_iter+0xac/0x118 configfs_write_iter from vfs_write+0x1b4/0x40c vfs_write from ksys_write+0x70/0xf8 ksys_write from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Fixes: 0db213ea8eed ("usb: gadget: udc: core: Invoke usb_gadget_connect only when started") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Stephan Gerhold stephan@gerhold.net Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZF4bMptC3Lf2Hnee@gerhold.net/ Reported-by: Francesco Dolcini francesco.dolcini@toradex.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZF4BvgsOyoKxdPFF@francesco-nb.int.toradex.com/ Reported-by: Alistair alistair@alistair23.me Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0cf8c588b701d7cf25ffe1a9217b81716e6a5c51.camel@... Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan badhri@google.com
drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c index 69041cca5d24..bbcfab50f657 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c @@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ static const struct bus_type gadget_bus_type;
- functions. usb_gadget_connect_locked, usb_gadget_disconnect_locked,
- usb_udc_connect_control_locked, usb_gadget_udc_start_locked, usb_gadget_udc_stop_locked are
- called with this lock held.
- @vbus_events: list head for processing vbus updates on usb_udc_vbus_handler.
- @vbus_events_lock: protects vbus_events list
- @vbus_work: work item that invokes usb_udc_connect_control_locked.
- This represents the internal data structure which is used by the UDC-class
- to hold information about udc driver and gadget together.
@@ -53,6 +56,19 @@ struct usb_udc { bool vbus; bool started; struct mutex connect_lock;
struct list_head vbus_events;
struct mutex vbus_events_lock;
struct work_struct vbus_work;
+};
+/**
- struct vbus_event - used to notify vbus updates posted through usb_udc_vbus_handler.
- @vbus_on: true when vbus is on. false other wise.
- @node: list node for maintaining a list of pending updates to be processed.
- */
+struct vbus_event {
bool vbus_on;
struct list_head node;
};
static struct class *udc_class; @@ -1134,6 +1150,23 @@ static int usb_udc_connect_control_locked(struct usb_udc *udc) __must_hold(&udc- return ret; }
+static void vbus_event_work(struct work_struct *work) +{
struct vbus_event *event, *n;
struct usb_udc *udc = container_of(work, struct usb_udc, vbus_work);
mutex_lock(&udc->vbus_events_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(event, n, &udc->vbus_events, node) {
mutex_lock(&udc->connect_lock);
udc->vbus = event->vbus_on;
usb_udc_connect_control_locked(udc);
list_del(&event->node);
kfree(event);
mutex_unlock(&udc->connect_lock);
}
mutex_unlock(&udc->vbus_events_lock);
+}
/**
- usb_udc_vbus_handler - updates the udc core vbus status, and try to
- connect or disconnect gadget
@@ -1146,13 +1179,20 @@ static int usb_udc_connect_control_locked(struct usb_udc *udc) __must_hold(&udc- void usb_udc_vbus_handler(struct usb_gadget *gadget, bool status) { struct usb_udc *udc = gadget->udc;
struct vbus_event *vbus_event;
mutex_lock(&udc->connect_lock);
if (udc) {
udc->vbus = status;
usb_udc_connect_control_locked(udc);
}
mutex_unlock(&udc->connect_lock);
if (!udc)
return;
vbus_event = kzalloc(sizeof(*vbus_event), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!vbus_event)
return;
mutex_lock(&udc->vbus_events_lock);
vbus_event->vbus_on = status;
list_add_tail(&vbus_event->node, &udc->vbus_events);
mutex_unlock(&udc->vbus_events_lock);
schedule_work(&udc->vbus_work);
} EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_udc_vbus_handler);
@@ -1379,6 +1419,9 @@ int usb_add_gadget(struct usb_gadget *gadget) udc->gadget = gadget; gadget->udc = udc; mutex_init(&udc->connect_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&udc->vbus_events);
mutex_init(&udc->vbus_events_lock);
INIT_WORK(&udc->vbus_work, vbus_event_work); udc->started = false;
base-commit: 6bae03b0484b54f699d69339fbec5658e885c224
2.40.1.606.ga4b1b128d6-goog
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 11:59:55AM +0000, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
chipidea udc calls usb_udc_vbus_handler from udc_start gadget ops causing a deadlock. Avoid this by offloading usb_udc_vbus_handler processing.
Surely that is the wrong approach.
The real problem here is that usb_udc_vbus_handler() gets called from within a udc_start routine. But this is totally unnecessary, because the UDC core will call usb_udc_connect_control_locked() itself, later on during gadget_bind_driver().
So a proper solution would be simply to remove the unnecessary usb_udc_vbus_handler() call from the chipidea driver (and similarly for the max3420_udc driver).
Similar changes may be needed in these drivers' udc_stop routines.
Alan Stern
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 7:44 AM Alan Stern stern@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 11:59:55AM +0000, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
chipidea udc calls usb_udc_vbus_handler from udc_start gadget ops causing a deadlock. Avoid this by offloading usb_udc_vbus_handler processing.
Surely that is the wrong approach.
The real problem here is that usb_udc_vbus_handler() gets called from within a udc_start routine. But this is totally unnecessary, because the UDC core will call usb_udc_connect_control_locked() itself, later on during gadget_bind_driver().
Hi Alan,
usb_udc_vbus_handler sets the udc->vbus flag as well apart from calling usb_udc_connect_control_locked(). So, removing usb_udc_vbus_handler from chip specific start callback might prevent the controller from starting.
void usb_udc_vbus_handler(struct usb_gadget *gadget, bool status) { struct usb_udc *udc = gadget->udc;
mutex_lock(&udc->connect_lock); if (udc) { udc->vbus = status; usb_udc_connect_control_locked(udc);
Thanks, Badhri
So a proper solution would be simply to remove the unnecessary usb_udc_vbus_handler() call from the chipidea driver (and similarly for the max3420_udc driver).
Similar changes may be needed in these drivers' udc_stop routines.
Alan Stern
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 10:19:25AM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 7:44 AM Alan Stern stern@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 11:59:55AM +0000, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
chipidea udc calls usb_udc_vbus_handler from udc_start gadget ops causing a deadlock. Avoid this by offloading usb_udc_vbus_handler processing.
Surely that is the wrong approach.
The real problem here is that usb_udc_vbus_handler() gets called from within a udc_start routine. But this is totally unnecessary, because the UDC core will call usb_udc_connect_control_locked() itself, later on during gadget_bind_driver().
Hi Alan,
usb_udc_vbus_handler sets the udc->vbus flag as well apart from calling usb_udc_connect_control_locked(). So, removing usb_udc_vbus_handler from chip specific start callback might prevent the controller from starting.
void usb_udc_vbus_handler(struct usb_gadget *gadget, bool status) { struct usb_udc *udc = gadget->udc;
mutex_lock(&udc->connect_lock); if (udc) { udc->vbus = status; usb_udc_connect_control_locked(udc);
Then add "udc->vbus = true;" at the appropriate spot in gadget_bind_driver().
Alan Stern
PS: I just noticed that in max3420_udc.c, the max_3420_vbus_handler() function calls usb_udc_vbus_handler() from within an interrupt handler. This won't work, since interrupt handlers aren't allowed to sleep and therefore can't lock mutexes.
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 1:01 PM Alan Stern stern@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 10:19:25AM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 7:44 AM Alan Stern stern@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 11:59:55AM +0000, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
chipidea udc calls usb_udc_vbus_handler from udc_start gadget ops causing a deadlock. Avoid this by offloading usb_udc_vbus_handler processing.
Surely that is the wrong approach.
The real problem here is that usb_udc_vbus_handler() gets called from within a udc_start routine. But this is totally unnecessary, because the UDC core will call usb_udc_connect_control_locked() itself, later on during gadget_bind_driver().
Hi Alan,
usb_udc_vbus_handler sets the udc->vbus flag as well apart from calling usb_udc_connect_control_locked(). So, removing usb_udc_vbus_handler from chip specific start callback might prevent the controller from starting.
void usb_udc_vbus_handler(struct usb_gadget *gadget, bool status) { struct usb_udc *udc = gadget->udc;
mutex_lock(&udc->connect_lock); if (udc) { udc->vbus = status; usb_udc_connect_control_locked(udc);
Then add "udc->vbus = true;" at the appropriate spot in gadget_bind_driver().
Not sure if I am misunderstanding something. "udc->vbus = true" is set by usb_udc_vbus_handler based on invocation from the chip level gadget driver and gadget_bind_driver() does not seem to have the context for udc->vbus. Do you still think it makes sense to add "udc->vbus = true;" to gadget_bind_driver() ?
Alan Stern
PS: I just noticed that in max3420_udc.c, the max_3420_vbus_handler() function calls usb_udc_vbus_handler() from within an interrupt handler. This won't work, since interrupt handlers aren't allowed to sleep and therefore can't lock mutexes.
Good point ! I didn't notice that usb_udc_vbus_handler() is invoked from interrupt context as well. I was looking at turning connect_lock into a spin lock. But looks like udc_lock which is acquired in usb_gadget_disconnect_locked is a mutex, So keeping connect_lock as mutex and changing vbus_events_lock into spin_lock is what that seems to be possible. Sending out V2 of this patch with these changes so that it's easier to see what I am referring to. Eager to know your thoughts !
Thanks, Badhri
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org