A devm_kzalloc() in asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe() could possibly return NULL pointer. NULL Pointer Dereference may be triggerred without addtional check. Add a NULL check for the returned pointer.
Fixes: b5022a36d28f ("ASoC: qcom: lpass: Use regmap_field for i2sctl and dmactl registers") Signed-off-by: Zichen Xie zichenxie0106@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org --- sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c index 5a47f661e0c6..242bc16da36d 100644 --- a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c @@ -1242,6 +1242,8 @@ int asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) /* Allocation for i2sctl regmap fields */ drvdata->i2sctl = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct lpaif_i2sctl), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!drvdata->i2sctl) + return -ENOMEM;
/* Initialize bitfields for dai I2SCTL register */ ret = lpass_cpu_init_i2sctl_bitfields(dev, drvdata->i2sctl,
On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 11:12:33AM -0500, Gax-c wrote:
A devm_kzalloc() in asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe() could possibly return NULL pointer. NULL Pointer Dereference may be triggerred without addtional check. Add a NULL check for the returned pointer.
Fixes: b5022a36d28f ("ASoC: qcom: lpass: Use regmap_field for i2sctl and dmactl registers") Signed-off-by: Zichen Xie zichenxie0106@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Your "From:" line does not match your signed-off-by :(
From: Zichen Xie zichenxie0106@gmail.com
A devm_kzalloc() in asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe() could possibly return NULL pointer. NULL Pointer Dereference may be triggerred without addtional check. Add a NULL check for the returned pointer.
Fixes: b5022a36d28f ("ASoC: qcom: lpass: Use regmap_field for i2sctl and dmactl registers") Signed-off-by: Zichen Xie zichenxie0106@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org --- sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c index 5a47f661e0c6..242bc16da36d 100644 --- a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c @@ -1242,6 +1242,8 @@ int asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) /* Allocation for i2sctl regmap fields */ drvdata->i2sctl = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct lpaif_i2sctl), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!drvdata->i2sctl) + return -ENOMEM;
/* Initialize bitfields for dai I2SCTL register */ ret = lpass_cpu_init_i2sctl_bitfields(dev, drvdata->i2sctl,
A devm_kzalloc() in asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe() could
call?
possibly return NULL pointer. NULL Pointer Dereference may be triggerred without addtional check.
…
* How do you think about to use the term “null pointer dereference” for the final commit message (including the summary phrase)?
* Would you like to avoid any typos here?
…
sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c | 2 ++
Did you overlook to add a version description behind the marker line? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Docu...
Regards, Markus
On Sat, Oct 05, 2024 at 05:40:53PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
A devm_kzalloc() in asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe() could
call?possibly return NULL pointer. NULL Pointer Dereference may be triggerred without addtional check.
…
How do you think about to use the term “null pointer dereference” for the final commit message (including the summary phrase)?
Would you like to avoid any typos here?
…
sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c | 2 ++
Did you overlook to add a version description behind the marker line? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Docu...
Regards, Markus
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
A devm_kzalloc() in asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe() could
call?possibly return NULL pointer. NULL Pointer Dereference may be triggerred without addtional check.
…
How do you think about to use the term “null pointer dereference” for the final commit message (including the summary phrase)?
Would you like to avoid any typos here?
…
sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c | 2 ++
Did you overlook to add a version description behind the marker line? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Docu...
…
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them.
* Do you care for any spell checking?
* Do you find any related advice (from other automated responses) helpful?
Regards, Markus
On Sun, Oct 06, 2024 at 10:56:51AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
A devm_kzalloc() in asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe() could
call?possibly return NULL pointer. NULL Pointer Dereference may be triggerred without addtional check.
…
How do you think about to use the term “null pointer dereference” for the final commit message (including the summary phrase)?
Would you like to avoid any typos here?
…
sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c | 2 ++
Did you overlook to add a version description behind the marker line? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Docu...
…
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them.
- Do you care for any spell checking?
No.
- Do you find any related advice (from other automated responses) helpful?
No.
A devm_kzalloc() in asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe() could
call?possibly return NULL pointer. NULL Pointer Dereference may be triggerred without addtional check.
…
How do you think about to use the term “null pointer dereference” for the final commit message (including the summary phrase)?
Would you like to avoid any typos here?
…
sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c | 2 ++
Did you overlook to add a version description behind the marker line? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Docu...
…
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
…
- Do you care for any spell checking?
No.
I find such a feedback surprising. Does it indicate any recurring communication difficulties?
- Do you find any related advice (from other automated responses) helpful?
No.
I wonder how this answer fits to reminders for the Linux patch review process (which were also automatically sent) according to your inbox filter rules.
Regards, Markus
- Do you find any related advice (from other automated responses) helpful?
No.
I wonder how this answer fits to reminders for the Linux patch review process (which were also automatically sent) according to your inbox filter rules.
See also: https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=%22This+looks+like+a+new+version+of+a+previou...
Regards, Markus
On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 10:27:39AM GMT, Gax-c wrote:
From: Zichen Xie zichenxie0106@gmail.com
A devm_kzalloc() in asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe() could possibly return NULL pointer. NULL Pointer Dereference may be triggerred without addtional check. Add a NULL check for the returned pointer.
Fixes: b5022a36d28f ("ASoC: qcom: lpass: Use regmap_field for i2sctl and dmactl registers") Signed-off-by: Zichen Xie zichenxie0106@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
I think Fixes / Cc / Signed-off-by is more logical.
sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
This is version two of your patch (even though the patch contents didn't change). Please tag your patches accordingly, provide a changelog and don't send next iteration as a reply to the existing thread (it might get lost or mishandled). Please send a proper v3 of your patch.
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Dmitry Baryshkov -
Gax-c -
Greg KH -
Greg Kroah-Hartman
-
Markus Elfring