This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.1-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.1-rc1
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Revert "dm raid: fix discard limits for raid1 and raid10"
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Revert "md: change mddev 'chunk_sectors' from int to unsigned"
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++-- drivers/md/dm-raid.c | 12 +++++------- drivers/md/md.h | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
This reverts commit 6ffeb1c3f8226244c08105bcdbeecc04bad6b89a.
It causes problems :(
Reported-by: Dave Jones davej@codemonkey.org.uk Reported-by: Mike Snitzer snitzer@redhat.com Cc: Song Liu songliubraving@fb.com Cc: Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/md/md.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/md/md.h +++ b/drivers/md/md.h @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ struct mddev { int external; /* metadata is * managed externally */ char metadata_type[17]; /* externally set*/ - unsigned int chunk_sectors; + int chunk_sectors; time64_t ctime, utime; int level, layout; char clevel[16]; @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ struct mddev { */ sector_t reshape_position; int delta_disks, new_level, new_layout; - unsigned int new_chunk_sectors; + int new_chunk_sectors; int reshape_backwards;
struct md_thread *thread; /* management thread */
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
This reverts commit e0910c8e4f87bb9f767e61a778b0d9271c4dc512.
It causes problems :(
Reported-by: Dave Jones davej@codemonkey.org.uk Reported-by: Mike Snitzer snitzer@redhat.com Cc: Zdenek Kabelac zkabelac@redhat.com Cc: Mikulas Patocka mpatocka@redhat.com Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/md/dm-raid.c | 12 +++++------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c @@ -3730,14 +3730,12 @@ static void raid_io_hints(struct dm_targ blk_limits_io_opt(limits, chunk_size_bytes * mddev_data_stripes(rs));
/* - * RAID10 personality requires bio splitting, - * RAID0/1/4/5/6 don't and process large discard bios properly. + * RAID1 and RAID10 personalities require bio splitting, + * RAID0/4/5/6 don't and process large discard bios properly. */ - if (rs_is_raid10(rs)) { - limits->discard_granularity = max(chunk_size_bytes, - limits->discard_granularity); - limits->max_discard_sectors = min_not_zero(rs->md.chunk_sectors, - limits->max_discard_sectors); + if (rs_is_raid1(rs) || rs_is_raid10(rs)) { + limits->discard_granularity = chunk_size_bytes; + limits->max_discard_sectors = rs->md.chunk_sectors; } }
On 12/14/20 10:06 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.1-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 03:20:38PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 12/14/20 10:06 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.1-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Thanks for testing this one and letting me know!
greg k-h
Hi Greg,
On 14/12/2020 17:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.1-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Test results for stable-v5.10: 15 builds: 15 pass, 0 fail 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail 64 tests: 63 pass, 1 fail
Linux version: 5.10.1-g841fca5a32cc Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Test failures: tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py
Some changes in v5.10 exposed a minor issue in the kernel that can cause a blank line warning to be seen. The above test is failing due to this blank warning. Thierry has posted a fix for this [0] and should be merged for v5.11. It was not tagged for stable, but if you OK to pull this in once in the mainline I can send a request. Otherwise all looks good, so ...
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Cheers Jon
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1336079/
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 09:20:26AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
Hi Greg,
On 14/12/2020 17:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.1-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Test results for stable-v5.10: 15 builds: 15 pass, 0 fail 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail 64 tests: 63 pass, 1 fail
Linux version: 5.10.1-g841fca5a32cc Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Test failures: tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py
Some changes in v5.10 exposed a minor issue in the kernel that can cause a blank line warning to be seen. The above test is failing due to this blank warning. Thierry has posted a fix for this [0] and should be merged for v5.11. It was not tagged for stable, but if you OK to pull this in once in the mainline I can send a request. Otherwise all looks good, so ...
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Thanks for testing this, and yes, I'll be glad to take this once it hits Linus's tree, just let me know the git commit id of it there.
thanks,
greg k-h
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 22:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.1-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------
kernel: 5.10.1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.10.y git commit: 841fca5a32cccd7d0123c0271f4350161ada5507 git describe: v5.10.1 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
No regressions (compared to build v5.10.1)
No fixes (compared to build v5.10.1)
Ran 56654 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
Environments -------------- - arc - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - parisc - powerpc - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-clang - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kcsan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - riscv - s390 - sh - sparc - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan
Test Suites ----------- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * v4l2-compliance * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * network-basic-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * perf * fwts * kunit * rcutorture * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 03:50:57PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 22:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.1-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
Thanks for testing this one!
greg k-h
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 06:06:09PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 427 pass: 427 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:32:26PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 06:06:09PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 427 pass: 427 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Thanks for testing! greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Shuah Khan