From: Yipeng Zou zouyipeng@huawei.com

Currently, The arguments passing to lockdep_hardirqs_{on,off} was fixed in CALLER_ADDR0. The function trace_hardirqs_on_caller should have been intended to use caller_addr to represent the address that caller wants to be traced.

For example, lockdep log in riscv showing the last {enabled,disabled} at __trace_hardirqs_{on,off} all the time(if called by): [ 57.853175] hardirqs last enabled at (2519): __trace_hardirqs_on+0xc/0x14 [ 57.853848] hardirqs last disabled at (2520): __trace_hardirqs_off+0xc/0x14

After use trace_hardirqs_xx_caller, we can get more effective information: [ 53.781428] hardirqs last enabled at (2595): restore_all+0xe/0x66 [ 53.782185] hardirqs last disabled at (2596): ret_from_exception+0xa/0x10

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220901104515.135162-2-zouyipeng@huawei.com

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c3bc8fd637a96 ("tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage") Signed-off-by: Yipeng Zou zouyipeng@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) rostedt@goodmis.org --- kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c b/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c index 95b58bd757ce..1e130da1b742 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c @@ -95,14 +95,14 @@ __visible void trace_hardirqs_on_caller(unsigned long caller_addr) }

lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare(); - lockdep_hardirqs_on(CALLER_ADDR0); + lockdep_hardirqs_on(caller_addr); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(trace_hardirqs_on_caller); NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(trace_hardirqs_on_caller);

__visible void trace_hardirqs_off_caller(unsigned long caller_addr) { - lockdep_hardirqs_off(CALLER_ADDR0); + lockdep_hardirqs_off(caller_addr);

if (!this_cpu_read(tracing_irq_cpu)) { this_cpu_write(tracing_irq_cpu, 1);