Le 15/09/2022 à 14:45, Sasha Levin a écrit :
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
hwmon: (pmbus) Use dev_err_probe() to filter -EPROBE_DEFER error messages
to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git%3Ba=su...
The filename of the patch is: hwmon-pmbus-use-dev_err_probe-to-filter-eprobe_defer.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let stable@vger.kernel.org know about it.
Hi,
I'm not sure that this one makes a real sense for backport.
It can't hurt, but it does not fix a real issue, it just voids a potential spurious message.
In my original mail, there is no "stable@" or "fix" or "bug" keywords or "Fixes:" tag. There is also apparently no patch in this backport serie that relies on this patch.
Why has it been selected?
(same for 5.15 and 5.19)
CJ
commit d20abd39a7843f50e07b6487c205d775f3361ac1 Author: Christophe JAILLET christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr Date: Wed Aug 17 15:04:00 2022 +0200
hwmon: (pmbus) Use dev_err_probe() to filter -EPROBE_DEFER error messages [ Upstream commit 09e52d17b72d3a4bf6951a90ccd8c97fae04e5cf ] devm_regulator_register() can return -EPROBE_DEFER, so better use dev_err_probe() instead of dev_err(), it is less verbose in such a case. It is also more informative, which can't hurt. Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3adf1cea6e32e54c0f71f4604b4e98d992beaa71.1660741419.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c index 117e3ce9c76ad..6d8ace96b0a73 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c @@ -2322,11 +2322,10 @@ static int pmbus_regulator_register(struct pmbus_data *data) rdev = devm_regulator_register(dev, &info->reg_desc[i], &config);
if (IS_ERR(rdev)) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to register %s regulator\n",
info->reg_desc[i].name);
return PTR_ERR(rdev);
}
if (IS_ERR(rdev))
return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rdev),
"Failed to register %s regulator\n",
}info->reg_desc[i].name);
return 0;
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 08:48:05PM +0200, Marion & Christophe JAILLET wrote:
Le 15/09/2022 à 14:45, Sasha Levin a écrit :
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
hwmon: (pmbus) Use dev_err_probe() to filter -EPROBE_DEFER error messages
to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git%3Ba=su...
The filename of the patch is: hwmon-pmbus-use-dev_err_probe-to-filter-eprobe_defer.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let stable@vger.kernel.org know about it.
Hi,
I'm not sure that this one makes a real sense for backport.
It can't hurt, but it does not fix a real issue, it just voids a potential spurious message.
In my original mail, there is no "stable@" or "fix" or "bug" keywords or "Fixes:" tag. There is also apparently no patch in this backport serie that relies on this patch.
Why has it been selected?
That is essentially how AUTOSEL works. It picks patches based on keywords. I am sure Sasha can provide details.
Guenter
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 03:47:25AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 08:48:05PM +0200, Marion & Christophe JAILLET wrote:
Le 15/09/2022 à 14:45, Sasha Levin a écrit :
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
hwmon: (pmbus) Use dev_err_probe() to filter -EPROBE_DEFER error messages
to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git%3Ba=su...
The filename of the patch is: hwmon-pmbus-use-dev_err_probe-to-filter-eprobe_defer.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let stable@vger.kernel.org know about it.
Hi,
I'm not sure that this one makes a real sense for backport.
It can't hurt, but it does not fix a real issue, it just voids a potential spurious message.
In my original mail, there is no "stable@" or "fix" or "bug" keywords or "Fixes:" tag. There is also apparently no patch in this backport serie that relies on this patch.
Why has it been selected?
That is essentially how AUTOSEL works. It picks patches based on keywords. I am sure Sasha can provide details.
Likely because of how many issues existed in this area (deferred probing), that it got selected automatically. I'll go drop it.
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org