The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
Possible dependencies:
544d163d659d ("io_uring: lock overflowing for IOPOLL") a8cf95f93610 ("io_uring: fix overflow handling regression") fa18fa2272c7 ("io_uring: inline __io_req_complete_put()") f9d567c75ec2 ("io_uring: inline __io_req_complete_post()") 52120f0fadcb ("io_uring: add allow_overflow to io_post_aux_cqe") e6130eba8a84 ("io_uring: add support for passing fixed file descriptors") 253993210bd8 ("io_uring: introduce locking helpers for CQE posting") 305bef988708 ("io_uring: hide eventfd assumptions in eventfd paths") d9dee4302a7c ("io_uring: remove ->flush_cqes optimisation") a830ffd28780 ("io_uring: move io_eventfd_signal()") 9046c6415be6 ("io_uring: reshuffle io_uring/io_uring.h") d142c3ec8d16 ("io_uring: remove extra io_commit_cqring()") 68494a65d0e2 ("io_uring: introduce io_req_cqe_overflow()") faf88dde060f ("io_uring: don't inline __io_get_cqe()") d245bca6375b ("io_uring: don't expose io_fill_cqe_aux()") aa1e90f64ee5 ("io_uring: move small helpers to headers") aa1e90f64ee5 ("io_uring: move small helpers to headers") aa1e90f64ee5 ("io_uring: move small helpers to headers") aa1e90f64ee5 ("io_uring: move small helpers to headers") aa1e90f64ee5 ("io_uring: move small helpers to headers")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 544d163d659d45a206d8929370d5a2984e546cb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavel Begunkov asml.silence@gmail.com Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 13:08:56 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: lock overflowing for IOPOLL MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
syzbot reports an issue with overflow filling for IOPOLL:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 28 at io_uring/io_uring.c:734 io_cqring_event_overflow+0x1c0/0x230 io_uring/io_uring.c:734 CPU: 0 PID: 28 Comm: kworker/u4:1 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc3-syzkaller-16369-g358a161a6a9e #0 Workqueue: events_unbound io_ring_exit_work Call trace: io_cqring_event_overflow+0x1c0/0x230 io_uring/io_uring.c:734 io_req_cqe_overflow+0x5c/0x70 io_uring/io_uring.c:773 io_fill_cqe_req io_uring/io_uring.h:168 [inline] io_do_iopoll+0x474/0x62c io_uring/rw.c:1065 io_iopoll_try_reap_events+0x6c/0x108 io_uring/io_uring.c:1513 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x13c/0x258 io_uring/io_uring.c:3056 io_ring_exit_work+0xec/0x390 io_uring/io_uring.c:2869 process_one_work+0x2d8/0x504 kernel/workqueue.c:2289 worker_thread+0x340/0x610 kernel/workqueue.c:2436 kthread+0x12c/0x158 kernel/kthread.c:376 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:863
There is no real problem for normal IOPOLL as flush is also called with uring_lock taken, but it's getting more complicated for IOPOLL|SQPOLL, for which __io_cqring_overflow_flush() happens from the CQ waiting path.
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+6805087452d72929404e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov asml.silence@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk
diff --git a/io_uring/rw.c b/io_uring/rw.c index 8227af2e1c0f..9c3ddd46a1ad 100644 --- a/io_uring/rw.c +++ b/io_uring/rw.c @@ -1062,7 +1062,11 @@ int io_do_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool force_nonspin) continue;
req->cqe.flags = io_put_kbuf(req, 0); - io_fill_cqe_req(req->ctx, req); + if (unlikely(!__io_fill_cqe_req(ctx, req))) { + spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock); + io_req_cqe_overflow(req); + spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock); + } }
if (unlikely(!nr_events))
On 1/14/23 2:51 AM, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
This has to be done a bit differently, but this one should work. I tested it on 5.10-stable, but should apply to 5.15-stable as well as they are the same base now.
On 1/14/23 9:15 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 1/14/23 2:51 AM, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
This has to be done a bit differently, but this one should work. I tested it on 5.10-stable, but should apply to 5.15-stable as well as they are the same base now.
Oops, missed accounting for overflow. Please use this one instead! Sorry about that.
On 1/14/23 9:21?AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 1/14/23 9:15?AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 1/14/23 2:51?AM, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
This has to be done a bit differently, but this one should work. I tested it on 5.10-stable, but should apply to 5.15-stable as well as they are the same base now.
Oops, missed accounting for overflow. Please use this one instead! Sorry about that.
Not batting 1000 on this one today. Wrote a test case for this specifically now and verified it, this one is good. For real.
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 09:48:34AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 1/14/23 9:21?AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 1/14/23 9:15?AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 1/14/23 2:51?AM, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
This has to be done a bit differently, but this one should work. I tested it on 5.10-stable, but should apply to 5.15-stable as well as they are the same base now.
Oops, missed accounting for overflow. Please use this one instead! Sorry about that.
Not batting 1000 on this one today. Wrote a test case for this specifically now and verified it, this one is good. For real.
Looks like Sasha grabbed all of these already, thanks for the backports!
greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org