The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.12.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x b3f6fcd8404f9f92262303369bb877ec5d188a81 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to 'stable@vger.kernel.org' --in-reply-to '2025052453-elastic-creature-b8c3@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.12.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From b3f6fcd8404f9f92262303369bb877ec5d188a81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tushar Dave tdave@nvidia.com Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 18:19:37 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] iommu: Skip PASID validation for devices without PASID capability

Generally PASID support requires ACS settings that usually create single device groups, but there are some niche cases where we can get multi-device groups and still have working PASID support. The primary issue is that PCI switches are not required to treat PASID tagged TLPs specially so appropriate ACS settings are required to route all TLPs to the host bridge if PASID is going to work properly.

pci_enable_pasid() does check that each device that will use PASID has the proper ACS settings to achieve this routing.

However, no-PASID devices can be combined with PASID capable devices within the same topology using non-uniform ACS settings. In this case the no-PASID devices may not have strict route to host ACS flags and end up being grouped with the PASID devices.

This configuration fails to allow use of the PASID within the iommu core code which wrongly checks if the no-PASID device supports PASID.

Fix this by ignoring no-PASID devices during the PASID validation. They will never issue a PASID TLP anyhow so they can be ignored.

Fixes: c404f55c26fc ("iommu: Validate the PASID in iommu_attach_device_pasid()") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Tushar Dave tdave@nvidia.com Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu baolu.lu@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Vasant Hegde vasant.hegde@amd.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250520011937.3230557-1-tdave@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel jroedel@suse.de

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c index 4f91a740c15f..9d728800a862 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c @@ -3366,10 +3366,12 @@ static int __iommu_set_group_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain, int ret;

for_each_group_device(group, device) { - ret = domain->ops->set_dev_pasid(domain, device->dev, - pasid, old); - if (ret) - goto err_revert; + if (device->dev->iommu->max_pasids > 0) { + ret = domain->ops->set_dev_pasid(domain, device->dev, + pasid, old); + if (ret) + goto err_revert; + } }

return 0; @@ -3379,15 +3381,18 @@ static int __iommu_set_group_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain, for_each_group_device(group, device) { if (device == last_gdev) break; - /* - * If no old domain, undo the succeeded devices/pasid. - * Otherwise, rollback the succeeded devices/pasid to the old - * domain. And it is a driver bug to fail attaching with a - * previously good domain. - */ - if (!old || WARN_ON(old->ops->set_dev_pasid(old, device->dev, + if (device->dev->iommu->max_pasids > 0) { + /* + * If no old domain, undo the succeeded devices/pasid. + * Otherwise, rollback the succeeded devices/pasid to + * the old domain. And it is a driver bug to fail + * attaching with a previously good domain. + */ + if (!old || + WARN_ON(old->ops->set_dev_pasid(old, device->dev, pasid, domain))) - iommu_remove_dev_pasid(device->dev, pasid, domain); + iommu_remove_dev_pasid(device->dev, pasid, domain); + } } return ret; } @@ -3398,8 +3403,10 @@ static void __iommu_remove_group_pasid(struct iommu_group *group, { struct group_device *device;

- for_each_group_device(group, device) - iommu_remove_dev_pasid(device->dev, pasid, domain); + for_each_group_device(group, device) { + if (device->dev->iommu->max_pasids > 0) + iommu_remove_dev_pasid(device->dev, pasid, domain); + } }

/* @@ -3440,7 +3447,13 @@ int iommu_attach_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,

mutex_lock(&group->mutex); for_each_group_device(group, device) { - if (pasid >= device->dev->iommu->max_pasids) { + /* + * Skip PASID validation for devices without PASID support + * (max_pasids = 0). These devices cannot issue transactions + * with PASID, so they don't affect group's PASID usage. + */ + if ((device->dev->iommu->max_pasids > 0) && + (pasid >= device->dev->iommu->max_pasids)) { ret = -EINVAL; goto out_unlock; }