We could make the T-Head CMOs depend on a new-enough assembler to have Zicbom, but it's not strictly necessary because the T-Head CMOs circumvent the assembler.
Fixes: 8f7e001e0325 ("RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Reported-by: Conor Dooley conor.dooley@microchip.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt palmer@rivosinc.com --- arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h index a89c005b4bbf..273ece6b622f 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h @@ -42,8 +42,12 @@ void flush_icache_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, bool local);
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
-#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM +/* + * The T-Head CMO errata internally probe the CBOM block size, but otherwise + * don't depend on Zicbom. + */ extern unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size; +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void); #else static inline void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void) { }
On 15/09/2022 18:09, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
We could make the T-Head CMOs depend on a new-enough assembler to have Zicbom, but it's not strictly necessary because the T-Head CMOs circumvent the assembler.
Fixes: 8f7e001e0325 ("RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Reported-by: Conor Dooley conor.dooley@microchip.com
I build-tested this last night when I accidentally found it so: Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley conor.dooley@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt palmer@rivosinc.com
arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h index a89c005b4bbf..273ece6b622f 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h @@ -42,8 +42,12 @@ void flush_icache_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, bool local); #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ -#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM +/*
- The T-Head CMO errata internally probe the CBOM block size, but otherwise
- don't depend on Zicbom.
- */
extern unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size; +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void); #else static inline void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void) { }
On 15/09/2022 18:13, Conor Dooley wrote:
On 15/09/2022 18:09, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
We could make the T-Head CMOs depend on a new-enough assembler to have Zicbom, but it's not strictly necessary because the T-Head CMOs circumvent the assembler.
Fixes: 8f7e001e0325 ("RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Reported-by: Conor Dooley conor.dooley@microchip.com
I build-tested this last night when I accidentally found it so: Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley conor.dooley@microchip.com
This is the one you I noticed you missed, msg-id is: 4d943291-f78f-31ed-0d67-7073e1f762e2@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt palmer@rivosinc.com
arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h index a89c005b4bbf..273ece6b622f 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h @@ -42,8 +42,12 @@ void flush_icache_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, bool local); #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ -#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM +/*
- The T-Head CMO errata internally probe the CBOM block size, but otherwise
- don't depend on Zicbom.
- */ extern unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void); #else static inline void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void) { }
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 05:22:59 PDT (-0700), Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
On 15/09/2022 18:13, Conor Dooley wrote:
On 15/09/2022 18:09, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
We could make the T-Head CMOs depend on a new-enough assembler to have Zicbom, but it's not strictly necessary because the T-Head CMOs circumvent the assembler.
Fixes: 8f7e001e0325 ("RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Reported-by: Conor Dooley conor.dooley@microchip.com
I build-tested this last night when I accidentally found it so: Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley conor.dooley@microchip.com
This is the one you I noticed you missed, msg-id is: 4d943291-f78f-31ed-0d67-7073e1f762e2@microchip.com
Sorry about that, the scripts to search for a Reviewed-by weren't handling the base64 encoding that Exchange was doing. It should be fixed, at least it is for the test merge I just made.
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt palmer@rivosinc.com
arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h index a89c005b4bbf..273ece6b622f 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h @@ -42,8 +42,12 @@ void flush_icache_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, bool local); #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ -#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM +/*
- The T-Head CMO errata internally probe the CBOM block size, but otherwise
- don't depend on Zicbom.
- */ extern unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void); #else static inline void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void) { }
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 07:41:34AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 05:22:59 PDT (-0700), Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
On 15/09/2022 18:13, Conor Dooley wrote:
On 15/09/2022 18:09, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
We could make the T-Head CMOs depend on a new-enough assembler to have Zicbom, but it's not strictly necessary because the T-Head CMOs circumvent the assembler.
Fixes: 8f7e001e0325 ("RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Reported-by: Conor Dooley conor.dooley@microchip.com
I build-tested this last night when I accidentally found it so: Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley conor.dooley@microchip.com
This is the one you I noticed you missed, msg-id is: 4d943291-f78f-31ed-0d67-7073e1f762e2@microchip.com
Sorry about that, the scripts to search for a Reviewed-by weren't handling the base64 encoding that Exchange was doing. It should be fixed, at least it is for the test merge I just made.
I'm just going to bite the bullet & learn lei + mutt & use my korg address for all mailing list things.* At least that'll help with my mails getting through to rivos inboxes if they come via infread too.
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt palmer@rivosinc.com
arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h index a89c005b4bbf..273ece6b622f 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h @@ -42,8 +42,12 @@ void flush_icache_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, bool local); #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ -#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM +/*
- The T-Head CMO errata internally probe the CBOM block size, but otherwise
- don't depend on Zicbom.
- */ extern unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void); #else static inline void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void) { }
linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
Am Donnerstag, 15. September 2022, 19:09:00 CEST schrieb Palmer Dabbelt:
We could make the T-Head CMOs depend on a new-enough assembler to have Zicbom, but it's not strictly necessary because the T-Head CMOs circumvent the assembler.
Fixes: 8f7e001e0325 ("RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Reported-by: Conor Dooley conor.dooley@microchip.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt palmer@rivosinc.com
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner heiko@sntech.de
arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h index a89c005b4bbf..273ece6b622f 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h @@ -42,8 +42,12 @@ void flush_icache_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, bool local); #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ -#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM +/*
- The T-Head CMO errata internally probe the CBOM block size, but otherwise
- don't depend on Zicbom.
- */
extern unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size; +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void); #else static inline void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void) { }
On Thu, 15 Sep 2022 14:15:13 PDT (-0700), heiko@sntech.de wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 15. September 2022, 19:09:00 CEST schrieb Palmer Dabbelt:
We could make the T-Head CMOs depend on a new-enough assembler to have Zicbom, but it's not strictly necessary because the T-Head CMOs circumvent the assembler.
Fixes: 8f7e001e0325 ("RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Reported-by: Conor Dooley conor.dooley@microchip.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt palmer@rivosinc.com
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner heiko@sntech.de
Thanks, this is on fixes (a little late this week due to the conferences, but I'm still hoping for rc6).
arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h index a89c005b4bbf..273ece6b622f 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h @@ -42,8 +42,12 @@ void flush_icache_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, bool local);
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
-#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM +/*
- The T-Head CMO errata internally probe the CBOM block size, but otherwise
- don't depend on Zicbom.
- */
extern unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size; +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void); #else static inline void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void) { }
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org