Before sending Enter Mode for an Alt Mode, there is a gap between Discover Modes and the Alt Mode driver queueing the Enter Mode VDM for the port partner to send a message to the port.
If this message results in unregistering Alt Modes such as in a DR_SWAP, then the following deadlock can occur with respect to the DisplayPort Alt Mode driver: 1. The DR_SWAP state holds port->lock. Unregistering the Alt Mode driver results in a cancel_work_sync() that waits for the current dp_altmode_work to finish. 2. dp_altmode_work makes a call to tcpm_altmode_enter. The deadlock occurs because tcpm_queue_vdm_unlock attempts to hold port->lock.
Before attempting to grab the lock, ensure that the port is in a state vdm_run_state_machine can run in. Alt Mode unregistration will not occur in these states.
Fixes: 03eafcfb60c0 ("usb: typec: tcpm: Add tcpm_queue_vdm_unlocked() helper") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: RD Babiera rdbabiera@google.com --- drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c index c26fb70c3ec6..6fa1601ac259 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c @@ -1564,6 +1564,10 @@ static void tcpm_queue_vdm(struct tcpm_port *port, const u32 header, static void tcpm_queue_vdm_unlocked(struct tcpm_port *port, const u32 header, const u32 *data, int cnt, enum tcpm_transmit_type tx_sop_type) { + if (port->state != SRC_READY && port->state != SNK_READY && + port->state != SRC_VDM_IDENTITY_REQUEST) + return; + mutex_lock(&port->lock); tcpm_queue_vdm(port, header, data, cnt, TCPC_TX_SOP); mutex_unlock(&port->lock);
base-commit: 684e9f5f97eb4b7831298ffad140d5c1d426ff27
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 08:23:57PM +0000, RD Babiera wrote:
Before sending Enter Mode for an Alt Mode, there is a gap between Discover Modes and the Alt Mode driver queueing the Enter Mode VDM for the port partner to send a message to the port.
If this message results in unregistering Alt Modes such as in a DR_SWAP, then the following deadlock can occur with respect to the DisplayPort Alt Mode driver:
- The DR_SWAP state holds port->lock. Unregistering the Alt Mode driver
results in a cancel_work_sync() that waits for the current dp_altmode_work to finish. 2. dp_altmode_work makes a call to tcpm_altmode_enter. The deadlock occurs because tcpm_queue_vdm_unlock attempts to hold port->lock.
Before attempting to grab the lock, ensure that the port is in a state vdm_run_state_machine can run in. Alt Mode unregistration will not occur in these states.
I'm probable missing something, but wouldn't it be safer to check port->state after grabbing the lock?
Fixes: 03eafcfb60c0 ("usb: typec: tcpm: Add tcpm_queue_vdm_unlocked() helper") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: RD Babiera rdbabiera@google.com
drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c index c26fb70c3ec6..6fa1601ac259 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c @@ -1564,6 +1564,10 @@ static void tcpm_queue_vdm(struct tcpm_port *port, const u32 header, static void tcpm_queue_vdm_unlocked(struct tcpm_port *port, const u32 header, const u32 *data, int cnt, enum tcpm_transmit_type tx_sop_type) {
- if (port->state != SRC_READY && port->state != SNK_READY &&
port->state != SRC_VDM_IDENTITY_REQUEST)
return;
- mutex_lock(&port->lock); tcpm_queue_vdm(port, header, data, cnt, TCPC_TX_SOP); mutex_unlock(&port->lock);
base-commit: 684e9f5f97eb4b7831298ffad140d5c1d426ff27
2.44.0.769.g3c40516874-goog
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 2:49 AM Heikki Krogerus heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com wrote:
I'm probable missing something, but wouldn't it be safer to check port->state after grabbing the lock?
I could have been more explicit in describing the deadlock, my bad. But there are two threads here:
Thread A starts in the TCPM. It is the port state machine that transitions to DR_SWAP and holds port->lock. When it unregisters DisplayPort Alt Mode, it goes into the DP Alt Mode driver and hangs until any DP Alt Mode work is finished.
Thread B starts in the DP Alt Mode driver. It attempts to call tcpm_enter_mode and the call to mutex_lock in tcpm_queue_vdm_unlock hangs because Thread A holds the lock. Thread A will never drop the lock because it waits for Thread B to finish.
So, the check is done before grabbing the lock because the thread needs to avoid grabbing the lock in the first place. If port->state changes between queueing and sending the message, the VDM state machine will drop the message anyways because port->state isn't in the ready state as well.
best, rd
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 10:37:21AM -0700, RD Babiera wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 2:49 AM Heikki Krogerus heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com wrote:
I'm probable missing something, but wouldn't it be safer to check port->state after grabbing the lock?
I could have been more explicit in describing the deadlock, my bad. But there are two threads here:
Thread A starts in the TCPM. It is the port state machine that transitions to DR_SWAP and holds port->lock. When it unregisters DisplayPort Alt Mode, it goes into the DP Alt Mode driver and hangs until any DP Alt Mode work is finished.
Thread B starts in the DP Alt Mode driver. It attempts to call tcpm_enter_mode and the call to mutex_lock in tcpm_queue_vdm_unlock hangs because Thread A holds the lock. Thread A will never drop the lock because it waits for Thread B to finish.
So, the check is done before grabbing the lock because the thread needs to avoid grabbing the lock in the first place. If port->state changes between queueing and sending the message, the VDM state machine will drop the message anyways because port->state isn't in the ready state as well.
Okay, thanks for the explanation.
Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org