The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 4811f7af6090e8f5a398fbdd766f903ef6c0d787 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to 'stable@vger.kernel.org' --in-reply-to '2024072928-thermal-reactor-e976@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

4811f7af6090 ("nilfs2: handle inconsistent state in nilfs_btnode_create_block()")

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 4811f7af6090e8f5a398fbdd766f903ef6c0d787 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ryusuke Konishi konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 14:20:07 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] nilfs2: handle inconsistent state in nilfs_btnode_create_block()

Syzbot reported that a buffer state inconsistency was detected in nilfs_btnode_create_block(), triggering a kernel bug.

It is not appropriate to treat this inconsistency as a bug; it can occur if the argument block address (the buffer index of the newly created block) is a virtual block number and has been reallocated due to corruption of the bitmap used to manage its allocation state.

So, modify nilfs_btnode_create_block() and its callers to treat it as a possible filesystem error, rather than triggering a kernel bug.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240725052007.4562-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Fixes: a60be987d45d ("nilfs2: B-tree node cache") Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+89cc4f2324ed37988b60@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=89cc4f2324ed37988b60 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org

diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/btnode.c b/fs/nilfs2/btnode.c index 0131d83b912d..c034080c334b 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/btnode.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/btnode.c @@ -51,12 +51,21 @@ nilfs_btnode_create_block(struct address_space *btnc, __u64 blocknr)

bh = nilfs_grab_buffer(inode, btnc, blocknr, BIT(BH_NILFS_Node)); if (unlikely(!bh)) - return NULL; + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);

if (unlikely(buffer_mapped(bh) || buffer_uptodate(bh) || buffer_dirty(bh))) { - brelse(bh); - BUG(); + /* + * The block buffer at the specified new address was already + * in use. This can happen if it is a virtual block number + * and has been reallocated due to corruption of the bitmap + * used to manage its allocation state (if not, the buffer + * clearing of an abandoned b-tree node is missing somewhere). + */ + nilfs_error(inode->i_sb, + "state inconsistency probably due to duplicate use of b-tree node block address %llu (ino=%lu)", + (unsigned long long)blocknr, inode->i_ino); + goto failed; } memset(bh->b_data, 0, i_blocksize(inode)); bh->b_bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev; @@ -67,6 +76,12 @@ nilfs_btnode_create_block(struct address_space *btnc, __u64 blocknr) folio_unlock(bh->b_folio); folio_put(bh->b_folio); return bh; + +failed: + folio_unlock(bh->b_folio); + folio_put(bh->b_folio); + brelse(bh); + return ERR_PTR(-EIO); }

int nilfs_btnode_submit_block(struct address_space *btnc, __u64 blocknr, @@ -217,8 +232,8 @@ int nilfs_btnode_prepare_change_key(struct address_space *btnc, }

nbh = nilfs_btnode_create_block(btnc, newkey); - if (!nbh) - return -ENOMEM; + if (IS_ERR(nbh)) + return PTR_ERR(nbh);

BUG_ON(nbh == obh); ctxt->newbh = nbh; diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/btree.c b/fs/nilfs2/btree.c index a139970e4804..862bdf23120e 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/btree.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/btree.c @@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ static int nilfs_btree_get_new_block(const struct nilfs_bmap *btree, struct buffer_head *bh;

bh = nilfs_btnode_create_block(btnc, ptr); - if (!bh) - return -ENOMEM; + if (IS_ERR(bh)) + return PTR_ERR(bh);

set_buffer_nilfs_volatile(bh); *bhp = bh;