We can trigger a slab-out-of-bounds with the following commands:
mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/$disk 10G mount /dev/$disk /tmp/test echo 2147483647 > /sys/fs/ext4/$disk/mb_group_prealloc echo test > /tmp/test/file && sync
================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists+0x8a/0x200 [ext4] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888121b9d0f0 by task kworker/u2:0/11 CPU: 0 PID: 11 Comm: kworker/u2:0 Tainted: GL 6.7.0-next-20240118 #521 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x2c/0x50 kasan_report+0xb6/0xf0 ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists+0x8a/0x200 [ext4] ext4_mb_regular_allocator+0x19e9/0x2370 [ext4] ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x88a/0x1370 [ext4] ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x14f7/0x2390 [ext4] ext4_map_blocks+0x569/0xea0 [ext4] ext4_do_writepages+0x10f6/0x1bc0 [ext4] [...] ==================================================================
The flow of issue triggering is as follows:
// Set s_mb_group_prealloc to 2147483647 via sysfs ext4_mb_new_blocks ext4_mb_normalize_request ext4_mb_normalize_group_request ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mb_group_prealloc ext4_mb_regular_allocator ext4_mb_choose_next_group ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail mb_avg_fragment_size_order order = fls(len) - 2 = 29 ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists frag_list = &sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size[order] if (list_empty(frag_list)) // Trigger SOOB!
At 4k block size, the length of the s_mb_avg_fragment_size list is 14, but an oversized s_mb_group_prealloc is set, causing slab-out-of-bounds to be triggered by an attempt to access an element at index 29.
Therefore it is not allowed to set s_mb_group_prealloc to a value greater than s_clusters_per_group via sysfs, and to avoid returning an order from mb_avg_fragment_size_order() that is greater than MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb).
Fixes: 7e170922f06b ("ext4: Add allocation criteria 1.5 (CR1_5)") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Baokun Li libaokun1@huawei.com --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 2 ++ fs/ext4/sysfs.c | 9 ++++++++- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index f44f668e407f..1ea6491b6b00 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -832,6 +832,8 @@ static int mb_avg_fragment_size_order(struct super_block *sb, ext4_grpblk_t len) return 0; if (order == MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb)) order--; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(order > MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb))) + order = MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb) - 1; return order; }
diff --git a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c index 6f9f96e00f2f..60ca7b2797b2 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c +++ b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ typedef enum { attr_trigger_test_error, attr_first_error_time, attr_last_error_time, + attr_group_prealloc, attr_feature, attr_pointer_pi, attr_pointer_ui, @@ -211,13 +212,14 @@ EXT4_ATTR_FUNC(sra_exceeded_retry_limit, 0444);
EXT4_ATTR_OFFSET(inode_readahead_blks, 0644, inode_readahead, ext4_sb_info, s_inode_readahead_blks); +EXT4_ATTR_OFFSET(mb_group_prealloc, 0644, group_prealloc, + ext4_sb_info, s_mb_group_prealloc); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(inode_goal, s_inode_goal); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_stats, s_mb_stats); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_max_to_scan, s_mb_max_to_scan); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_min_to_scan, s_mb_min_to_scan); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_order2_req, s_mb_order2_reqs); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_stream_req, s_mb_stream_request); -EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_PI(mb_group_prealloc, s_mb_group_prealloc); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_max_linear_groups, s_mb_max_linear_groups); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(extent_max_zeroout_kb, s_extent_max_zeroout_kb); EXT4_ATTR(trigger_fs_error, 0200, trigger_test_error); @@ -380,6 +382,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_generic_attr_show(struct ext4_attr *a,
switch (a->attr_id) { case attr_inode_readahead: + case attr_group_prealloc: case attr_pointer_pi: case attr_pointer_ui: if (a->attr_ptr == ptr_ext4_super_block_offset) @@ -453,6 +456,10 @@ static ssize_t ext4_generic_attr_store(struct ext4_attr *a, return ret;
switch (a->attr_id) { + case attr_group_prealloc: + if (t > sbi->s_clusters_per_group) + return -EINVAL; + fallthrough; case attr_pointer_pi: if ((int)t < 0) return -EINVAL;
On 2024/1/26 16:57, Baokun Li wrote:
We can trigger a slab-out-of-bounds with the following commands:
mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/$disk 10G mount /dev/$disk /tmp/test echo 2147483647 > /sys/fs/ext4/$disk/mb_group_prealloc echo test > /tmp/test/file && sync================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists+0x8a/0x200 [ext4] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888121b9d0f0 by task kworker/u2:0/11 CPU: 0 PID: 11 Comm: kworker/u2:0 Tainted: GL 6.7.0-next-20240118 #521 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x2c/0x50 kasan_report+0xb6/0xf0 ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists+0x8a/0x200 [ext4] ext4_mb_regular_allocator+0x19e9/0x2370 [ext4] ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x88a/0x1370 [ext4] ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x14f7/0x2390 [ext4] ext4_map_blocks+0x569/0xea0 [ext4] ext4_do_writepages+0x10f6/0x1bc0 [ext4] [...] ==================================================================
The flow of issue triggering is as follows:
// Set s_mb_group_prealloc to 2147483647 via sysfs ext4_mb_new_blocks ext4_mb_normalize_request ext4_mb_normalize_group_request ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mb_group_prealloc ext4_mb_regular_allocator ext4_mb_choose_next_group ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail mb_avg_fragment_size_order order = fls(len) - 2 = 29 ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists frag_list = &sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size[order] if (list_empty(frag_list)) // Trigger SOOB!
At 4k block size, the length of the s_mb_avg_fragment_size list is 14, but an oversized s_mb_group_prealloc is set, causing slab-out-of-bounds to be triggered by an attempt to access an element at index 29.
Therefore it is not allowed to set s_mb_group_prealloc to a value greater than s_clusters_per_group via sysfs, and to avoid returning an order from mb_avg_fragment_size_order() that is greater than MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb).
Fixes: 7e170922f06b ("ext4: Add allocation criteria 1.5 (CR1_5)") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Baokun Li libaokun1@huawei.com
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi yi.zhang@huawei.com
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 2 ++ fs/ext4/sysfs.c | 9 ++++++++- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index f44f668e407f..1ea6491b6b00 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -832,6 +832,8 @@ static int mb_avg_fragment_size_order(struct super_block *sb, ext4_grpblk_t len) return 0; if (order == MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb)) order--;
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(order > MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb)))
order = MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb) - 1;} diff --git a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c index 6f9f96e00f2f..60ca7b2797b2 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c +++ b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ typedef enum { attr_trigger_test_error, attr_first_error_time, attr_last_error_time,
- attr_group_prealloc, attr_feature, attr_pointer_pi, attr_pointer_ui,
@@ -211,13 +212,14 @@ EXT4_ATTR_FUNC(sra_exceeded_retry_limit, 0444); EXT4_ATTR_OFFSET(inode_readahead_blks, 0644, inode_readahead, ext4_sb_info, s_inode_readahead_blks); +EXT4_ATTR_OFFSET(mb_group_prealloc, 0644, group_prealloc,
ext4_sb_info, s_mb_group_prealloc);EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(inode_goal, s_inode_goal); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_stats, s_mb_stats); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_max_to_scan, s_mb_max_to_scan); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_min_to_scan, s_mb_min_to_scan); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_order2_req, s_mb_order2_reqs); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_stream_req, s_mb_stream_request); -EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_PI(mb_group_prealloc, s_mb_group_prealloc); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_max_linear_groups, s_mb_max_linear_groups); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(extent_max_zeroout_kb, s_extent_max_zeroout_kb); EXT4_ATTR(trigger_fs_error, 0200, trigger_test_error); @@ -380,6 +382,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_generic_attr_show(struct ext4_attr *a, switch (a->attr_id) { case attr_inode_readahead:
- case attr_group_prealloc: case attr_pointer_pi: case attr_pointer_ui: if (a->attr_ptr == ptr_ext4_super_block_offset)
@@ -453,6 +456,10 @@ static ssize_t ext4_generic_attr_store(struct ext4_attr *a, return ret; switch (a->attr_id) {
- case attr_group_prealloc:
if (t > sbi->s_clusters_per_group)return -EINVAL;fallthrough;
On Fri 26-01-24 16:57:14, Baokun Li wrote:
We can trigger a slab-out-of-bounds with the following commands:
mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/$disk 10G mount /dev/$disk /tmp/test echo 2147483647 > /sys/fs/ext4/$disk/mb_group_prealloc echo test > /tmp/test/file && sync================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists+0x8a/0x200 [ext4] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888121b9d0f0 by task kworker/u2:0/11 CPU: 0 PID: 11 Comm: kworker/u2:0 Tainted: GL 6.7.0-next-20240118 #521 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x2c/0x50 kasan_report+0xb6/0xf0 ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists+0x8a/0x200 [ext4] ext4_mb_regular_allocator+0x19e9/0x2370 [ext4] ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x88a/0x1370 [ext4] ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x14f7/0x2390 [ext4] ext4_map_blocks+0x569/0xea0 [ext4] ext4_do_writepages+0x10f6/0x1bc0 [ext4] [...] ==================================================================
The flow of issue triggering is as follows:
// Set s_mb_group_prealloc to 2147483647 via sysfs ext4_mb_new_blocks ext4_mb_normalize_request ext4_mb_normalize_group_request ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mb_group_prealloc ext4_mb_regular_allocator ext4_mb_choose_next_group ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail mb_avg_fragment_size_order order = fls(len) - 2 = 29 ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists frag_list = &sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size[order] if (list_empty(frag_list)) // Trigger SOOB!
At 4k block size, the length of the s_mb_avg_fragment_size list is 14, but an oversized s_mb_group_prealloc is set, causing slab-out-of-bounds to be triggered by an attempt to access an element at index 29.
Therefore it is not allowed to set s_mb_group_prealloc to a value greater than s_clusters_per_group via sysfs, and to avoid returning an order from mb_avg_fragment_size_order() that is greater than MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb).
Fixes: 7e170922f06b ("ext4: Add allocation criteria 1.5 (CR1_5)") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Baokun Li libaokun1@huawei.com
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara jack@suse.cz
Honza
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 2 ++ fs/ext4/sysfs.c | 9 ++++++++- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index f44f668e407f..1ea6491b6b00 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -832,6 +832,8 @@ static int mb_avg_fragment_size_order(struct super_block *sb, ext4_grpblk_t len) return 0; if (order == MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb)) order--;
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(order > MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb)))
order = MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb) - 1;} diff --git a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c index 6f9f96e00f2f..60ca7b2797b2 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c +++ b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ typedef enum { attr_trigger_test_error, attr_first_error_time, attr_last_error_time,
- attr_group_prealloc, attr_feature, attr_pointer_pi, attr_pointer_ui,
@@ -211,13 +212,14 @@ EXT4_ATTR_FUNC(sra_exceeded_retry_limit, 0444); EXT4_ATTR_OFFSET(inode_readahead_blks, 0644, inode_readahead, ext4_sb_info, s_inode_readahead_blks); +EXT4_ATTR_OFFSET(mb_group_prealloc, 0644, group_prealloc,
ext4_sb_info, s_mb_group_prealloc);EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(inode_goal, s_inode_goal); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_stats, s_mb_stats); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_max_to_scan, s_mb_max_to_scan); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_min_to_scan, s_mb_min_to_scan); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_order2_req, s_mb_order2_reqs); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_stream_req, s_mb_stream_request); -EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_PI(mb_group_prealloc, s_mb_group_prealloc); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_max_linear_groups, s_mb_max_linear_groups); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(extent_max_zeroout_kb, s_extent_max_zeroout_kb); EXT4_ATTR(trigger_fs_error, 0200, trigger_test_error); @@ -380,6 +382,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_generic_attr_show(struct ext4_attr *a, switch (a->attr_id) { case attr_inode_readahead:
- case attr_group_prealloc: case attr_pointer_pi: case attr_pointer_ui: if (a->attr_ptr == ptr_ext4_super_block_offset)
@@ -453,6 +456,10 @@ static ssize_t ext4_generic_attr_store(struct ext4_attr *a, return ret; switch (a->attr_id) {
- case attr_group_prealloc:
if (t > sbi->s_clusters_per_group)return -EINVAL;fallthrough;-- 2.31.1
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 04:57:14PM +0800, Baokun Li wrote:
Hey Baokun,
Good catch! I've added some minor comments below. Other than that feel free to add
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
We can trigger a slab-out-of-bounds with the following commands:
mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/$disk 10G mount /dev/$disk /tmp/test echo 2147483647 > /sys/fs/ext4/$disk/mb_group_prealloc echo test > /tmp/test/file && sync================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists+0x8a/0x200 [ext4] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888121b9d0f0 by task kworker/u2:0/11 CPU: 0 PID: 11 Comm: kworker/u2:0 Tainted: GL 6.7.0-next-20240118 #521 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x2c/0x50 kasan_report+0xb6/0xf0 ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists+0x8a/0x200 [ext4] ext4_mb_regular_allocator+0x19e9/0x2370 [ext4] ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x88a/0x1370 [ext4] ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x14f7/0x2390 [ext4] ext4_map_blocks+0x569/0xea0 [ext4] ext4_do_writepages+0x10f6/0x1bc0 [ext4] [...] ==================================================================
The flow of issue triggering is as follows:
// Set s_mb_group_prealloc to 2147483647 via sysfs ext4_mb_new_blocks ext4_mb_normalize_request ext4_mb_normalize_group_request ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mb_group_prealloc ext4_mb_regular_allocator ext4_mb_choose_next_group ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail mb_avg_fragment_size_order order = fls(len) - 2 = 29 ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists frag_list = &sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size[order] if (list_empty(frag_list)) // Trigger SOOB!
At 4k block size, the length of the s_mb_avg_fragment_size list is 14, but an oversized s_mb_group_prealloc is set, causing slab-out-of-bounds to be triggered by an attempt to access an element at index 29.
Therefore it is not allowed to set s_mb_group_prealloc to a value greater than s_clusters_per_group via sysfs, and to avoid returning an order from mb_avg_fragment_size_order() that is greater than MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb).
Fixes: 7e170922f06b ("ext4: Add allocation criteria 1.5 (CR1_5)") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Baokun Li libaokun1@huawei.com
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 2 ++ fs/ext4/sysfs.c | 9 ++++++++- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index f44f668e407f..1ea6491b6b00 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -832,6 +832,8 @@ static int mb_avg_fragment_size_order(struct super_block *sb, ext4_grpblk_t len) return 0; if (order == MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb)) order--;
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(order > MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb)))
- order = MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb) - 1; return order;
}
So along with this change, I think it'll also be good to add an extra check in ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail() as:
if (1 << min_order < ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len) min_order = fls(ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len);
+ if (order >= MB_NUM_ORDERS(ac->ac_sb)) + order = MB_NUM_ORDERS(ac->ac_sb) - 1; + for (i = order; i >= min_order; i--) { int frag_order; /*
The reason for this is that otherwise when order is large eg 29, we would unnecessarily loop from i=29 to i=13 while always looking at the same avg_fragment_list[13].
Regards, ojaswin
On 2024/2/20 13:39, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 04:57:14PM +0800, Baokun Li wrote:
Hey Baokun,
Good catch! I've added some minor comments below. Other than that feel free to add
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
We can trigger a slab-out-of-bounds with the following commands:
mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/$disk 10G mount /dev/$disk /tmp/test echo 2147483647 > /sys/fs/ext4/$disk/mb_group_prealloc echo test > /tmp/test/file && sync================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists+0x8a/0x200 [ext4] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888121b9d0f0 by task kworker/u2:0/11 CPU: 0 PID: 11 Comm: kworker/u2:0 Tainted: GL 6.7.0-next-20240118 #521 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x2c/0x50 kasan_report+0xb6/0xf0 ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists+0x8a/0x200 [ext4] ext4_mb_regular_allocator+0x19e9/0x2370 [ext4] ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x88a/0x1370 [ext4] ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x14f7/0x2390 [ext4] ext4_map_blocks+0x569/0xea0 [ext4] ext4_do_writepages+0x10f6/0x1bc0 [ext4] [...] ==================================================================
The flow of issue triggering is as follows:
// Set s_mb_group_prealloc to 2147483647 via sysfs ext4_mb_new_blocks ext4_mb_normalize_request ext4_mb_normalize_group_request ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mb_group_prealloc ext4_mb_regular_allocator ext4_mb_choose_next_group ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail mb_avg_fragment_size_order order = fls(len) - 2 = 29 ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists frag_list = &sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size[order] if (list_empty(frag_list)) // Trigger SOOB!
At 4k block size, the length of the s_mb_avg_fragment_size list is 14, but an oversized s_mb_group_prealloc is set, causing slab-out-of-bounds to be triggered by an attempt to access an element at index 29.
Therefore it is not allowed to set s_mb_group_prealloc to a value greater than s_clusters_per_group via sysfs, and to avoid returning an order from mb_avg_fragment_size_order() that is greater than MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb).
Fixes: 7e170922f06b ("ext4: Add allocation criteria 1.5 (CR1_5)") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Baokun Li libaokun1@huawei.com
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 2 ++ fs/ext4/sysfs.c | 9 ++++++++- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index f44f668e407f..1ea6491b6b00 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -832,6 +832,8 @@ static int mb_avg_fragment_size_order(struct super_block *sb, ext4_grpblk_t len) return 0; if (order == MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb)) order--;
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(order > MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb)))
- order = MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb) - 1; return order; }
So along with this change, I think it'll also be good to add an extra check in ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail() as:
if (1 << min_order < ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len) min_order = fls(ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len);
- if (order >= MB_NUM_ORDERS(ac->ac_sb))
- order = MB_NUM_ORDERS(ac->ac_sb) - 1;
- for (i = order; i >= min_order; i--) { int frag_order; /*
The reason for this is that otherwise when order is large eg 29, we would unnecessarily loop from i=29 to i=13 while always looking at the same avg_fragment_list[13].
Regards, ojaswin
Yeah, good point! This will cut down on some unnecessary loops.
I'll add this extra check in the next version.
Thanks for having a look!
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Baokun Li -
Jan Kara -
Ojaswin Mujoo -
Zhang Yi