Add device awake calls in case of rproc boot and rproc shutdown path. Currently, device awake call is only present in the recovery path of remoteproc. If a user stops and starts rproc by using the sysfs interface, then on pm suspension the firmware loading fails. Keep the device awake in such a case just like it is done for the recovery path.
Signed-off-by: Souradeep Chowdhury quic_schowdhu@quicinc.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org --- drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index c2cf0d277729..908a7b8f6c7e 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c @@ -1916,7 +1916,8 @@ int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc) pr_err("invalid rproc handle\n"); return -EINVAL; } - + + pm_stay_awake(rproc->dev.parent); dev = &rproc->dev;
ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock); @@ -1961,6 +1962,7 @@ int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc) atomic_dec(&rproc->power); unlock_mutex: mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock); + pm_relax(rproc->dev.parent); return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_boot); @@ -1991,6 +1993,7 @@ int rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc) struct device *dev = &rproc->dev; int ret = 0;
+ pm_stay_awake(rproc->dev.parent); ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "can't lock rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret); @@ -2027,6 +2030,7 @@ int rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc) rproc->table_ptr = NULL; out: mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock); + pm_relax(rproc->dev.parent); return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_shutdown);
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:11:10AM +0530, Souradeep Chowdhury wrote:
Add device awake calls in case of rproc boot and rproc shutdown path. Currently, device awake call is only present in the recovery path of remoteproc. If a user stops and starts rproc by using the sysfs interface, then on pm suspension the firmware loading fails. Keep the device awake in such a case just like it is done for the recovery path.
Signed-off-by: Souradeep Chowdhury quic_schowdhu@quicinc.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index c2cf0d277729..908a7b8f6c7e 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c @@ -1916,7 +1916,8 @@ int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc) pr_err("invalid rproc handle\n"); return -EINVAL; }
- pm_stay_awake(rproc->dev.parent); dev = &rproc->dev;
ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock); @@ -1961,6 +1962,7 @@ int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc) atomic_dec(&rproc->power); unlock_mutex: mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
- pm_relax(rproc->dev.parent); return ret;
} EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_boot); @@ -1991,6 +1993,7 @@ int rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc) struct device *dev = &rproc->dev; int ret = 0;
- pm_stay_awake(rproc->dev.parent); ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "can't lock rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
@@ -2027,6 +2030,7 @@ int rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc) rproc->table_ptr = NULL; out: mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
- pm_relax(rproc->dev.parent); return ret;
} EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_shutdown); -- 2.34.1
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Greg KH -
Souradeep Chowdhury