Re: [Regression 6.1.y] From "cifs: Fix flushing, invalidation and file size with copy_file_range()"
On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 11:08:00AM -0600, Steve French wrote:
I thought that it was "safer" since if it was misapplied to version where new folio rc behavior it wouldn't regress anything
There are only three versions where this patch can be applied: 6.7, 6.6 and 6.1. AIUI it's a backport from 6.7, it's already applied to 6.6, and it misapplies to 6.1. So this kind of belt-and-braces approach is unnecessary.
On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 05:51:19PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 11:08:00AM -0600, Steve French wrote:
I thought that it was "safer" since if it was misapplied to version where new folio rc behavior it wouldn't regress anything
There are only three versions where this patch can be applied: 6.7, 6.6 and 6.1. AIUI it's a backport from 6.7, it's already applied to 6.6, and it misapplies to 6.1. So this kind of belt-and-braces approach is unnecessary.
Agreed, I've fixed this up now, thanks all!
greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Greg KH -
Matthew Wilcox