Also to PATCH 3.
You could club PATCH 3 and 4.
Regards Preeti U Murthy
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Preeti Murthy preeti.lkml@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Daniel,
This patch looks correct to me. Reviewed-by: Preeti U Murthy preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
wrote:
The cpu parameter is no longer needed in nohz_balancer_kick, let's remove the parameter.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
kernel/sched/fair.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 1f7ed1a..c647c45 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -6517,7 +6517,7 @@ static inline int find_new_ilb(void)
- nohz_load_balancer CPU (if there is one) otherwise fallback to any
idle
- CPU (if there is one).
*/ -static void nohz_balancer_kick(int cpu) +static void nohz_balancer_kick(void) { int ilb_cpu;
@@ -6871,15 +6871,13 @@ static inline int on_null_domain(struct rq *rq) */ void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq) {
int cpu = rq->cpu;/* Don't need to rebalance while attached to NULL domain */ if (time_after_eq(jiffies, rq->next_balance) && likely(!on_null_domain(rq))) raise_softirq(SCHED_SOFTIRQ);#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON if (nohz_kick_needed(rq) && likely(!on_null_domain(rq)))
nohz_balancer_kick(cpu);
nohz_balancer_kick();#endif }
-- 1.7.9.5
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/