We don't use get_property() to find max levels anymore as it is done at boot now. So, don't support GET_MAXL in get_property().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org --- drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 14 +++----------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c index d34cc5b..d2e6f84 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c @@ -116,7 +116,6 @@ static void release_idr(struct idr *idr, int id) enum cpufreq_cooling_property { GET_LEVEL, GET_FREQ, - GET_MAXL, };
/** @@ -124,12 +123,11 @@ enum cpufreq_cooling_property { * @cpu: cpu for which the property is required * @input: query parameter * @output: query return - * @property: type of query (frequency, level, max level) + * @property: type of query (frequency, level) * * This is the common function to - * 1. get maximum cpu cooling states - * 2. translate frequency to cooling state - * 3. translate cooling state to frequency + * 1. translate frequency to cooling state + * 2. translate cooling state to frequency * * Note that the code may be not in good shape * but it is written in this way in order to: @@ -176,12 +174,6 @@ static int get_property(unsigned int cpu, unsigned long input, /* max_level is an index, not a counter */ max_level--;
- /* get max level */ - if (property == GET_MAXL) { - *output = (unsigned int)max_level; - return 0; - } - if (property == GET_FREQ) level = descend ? input : (max_level - input);