On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 09:23:02AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 04/17/2013 09:15 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
Thanks for working on this, Daniel.
The imx6q change looks good to me. But I have a comment on imx5 changes below.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 02:36:05PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx5.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx5.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ba4565f --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx5.c @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ +/*
- Copyright (C) 2012 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
- This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
- it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
- published by the Free Software Foundation.
- */
+#include <linux/cpuidle.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <asm/system_misc.h> +#include <asm/proc-fns.h>
+#include "hardware.h"
This seems not needed.
+static int imx5_cpuidle_enter(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index)+{
- arm_pm_idle();
The existing imx5 cpuidle code has an tzic_enable_wake() call before going to idle. I think it's there for some reason.
The idle function for imx5 is untouched, it is called through arm_pm_idle instead.
The arm_pm_idle is initialized in imx5_pm_common_init:
arm_pm_idle = imx5_pm_idle;
Ah, yes. I missed that, sorry.
Acked-by: Shawn Guo shawn.guo@linaro.org
The imx5_pm_idle function calls imx5_do_pm_idle which in turns calls tzic_enable_wake and cpu_do_idle.