On 18 July 2013 16:23, Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org wrote:
From: Mark Brown broonie@linaro.org
There is no need to use a normal per-CPU workqueue for delayed power downs as they're not timing or performance critical and waking up a core for them would defeat some of the point.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@linaro.org
drivers/regulator/core.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c index b6efead..6ef476f 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c @@ -1891,8 +1891,9 @@ int regulator_disable_deferred(struct regulator *regulator, int ms) rdev->deferred_disables++; mutex_unlock(&rdev->mutex);
ret = schedule_delayed_work(&rdev->disable_work,msecs_to_jiffies(ms));
ret = queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq,&rdev->disable_work,msecs_to_jiffies(ms)); if (ret < 0) return ret; else
Cool!! People have started to use this interface now :)
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org