On 10 June 2013 17:43, Chanwoo Choi cw00.choi@samsung.com wrote:
On 06/07/2013 07:23 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 5 June 2013 13:41, Chanwoo Choi cw00.choi@samsung.com wrote:
1301500082290 800000 61 11 1 43
...
When 1301500082290 ns: cpu0's busy_cpu_threshold : 32 = 64 * (800000/1600000)
s/64/61 :)
How are you getting loads different for all your cpus? I believe you are just recording these values for policy->cpu and all cpus share same policy on your platform.
I got the Per-CPU load by using cpufreq_notify_transition(). when cpufreq governor call dbs_check_cpu().
I forgot to remove this line in my earlier reply. I understood this towards the end of patch.
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;+#endif
Why do you need this to be global?
I'll remove global variable and move 'freqs' in some structure.
??
You can just make it a local variable in the only function it is used.
TIP: Always place a blank line before and after your reply to kernel mails, this makes it much more readable.