On 2 June 2011 18:55, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pitre@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back in or should we plan on a LT/BSP kernel for full functionality. I presume if those patches were headed upstream they would be headed upstream:). If not they they should not be in linux-linaro.
This is the strategy of this game. If it isn't going upstream you lose.
First, please don't take offense to this feedback. I know kernel banter can have a harsh undertone.
I'd like to suggest this kind of feedback isn't appropriate. The issues concerning what can't be upstreamed are well known.
In practice this means that AndyDoan/Ricardo will have to do their work again on top of this tree, and then I might merge it.
I'd like to further suggest that in the interest of cooperation that we take a more constructive tone. We're all going to need to work closely to accomplish our goals of upstreaming support for these boards and unifying implementations.
Nicolas
linaro-kernel mailing list linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-kernel