On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Ingo Molnar mingo@kernel.org wrote:
- Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote:
This patch rectifies a comment present in sugov_irq_work() function to follow proper grammar.
Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar mingo@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c index 42a220e78f00..71e1a980d40a 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c @@ -315,15 +315,15 @@ static void sugov_irq_work(struct irq_work *irq_work) sg_policy = container_of(irq_work, struct sugov_policy, irq_work);
/*
* For Real Time and Deadline tasks, the schedutil governor shoots the* frequency to maximum. Special care must be taken to ensure that this* kthread doesn't result in the same behavior. * * This is (mostly) guaranteed by the work_in_progress flag. The flag is* updated only at the end of the sugov_work() function and before that* the schedutil governor rejects all other frequency scaling requests. ** There is a very rare case though, where the RT thread yields right * after the work_in_progress flag is cleared. The effects of that are * neglected for now. */Also:
s/Real Time task/RT task s/Deadline task/deadline task
With those:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar mingo@kernel.org
Fixed up and applied.
Thanks, Rafael