On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 10:14:18AM +0100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 09:46 +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
*My* strategy is to get rid of pci_domain_nr(). I don't see why we need to have arch specific way of providing the number, specially after looking at the existing implementations that return a value from a variable that is never touched or incremented. My guess is that pci_domain_nr() was created to work around the fact that there was no domain_nr maintainance in the generic code.
Well, there was no generic host bridge structure. There is one now, it should go there.
Exactly! Hence my patch. After it gets accepted I will go through architectures and remove their version of pci_domain_nr().
Best regards, Liviu
Cheers, Ben.