On Monday, April 08, 2013 06:15:09 PM Kukjin Kim wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, April 05, 2013 12:36:34 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim kgene.kim@samsung.com wrote:
Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based
on
for-next of samsung tree because this touches too many samsung stuff
so this
should be sent to upstream via samsung tree.
Hmm... Its already applied in Rafael's tree. But it doesn't mean that it can't be moved to your tree if there is a issue.
Well, I'm dropping it. Please merge via the Samsung tree.
OK, I will.
I got patch file from Viresh, and there is a sign from Rafael, but it should be ack. So Rafael, let me use your ack on this patch when I apply. If any problems, please let me know.
Since it was signed-off by me before, you can assume it's been ACKed as well.
Thanks, Rafael