6 Jun
2013
6 Jun
'13
9:57 a.m.
On 6 June 2013 15:25, Borislav Petkov bp@suse.de wrote:
The correct "fix" for this whole deal is coupling cpufreq with the scheduler, as it has been said so many times before. You need "something" which can tell you whether raising the freq. is worth it or not (i.e. the process is waiting on IO or is executing instructions).
Linaro has got a blueprint in this direction but doesn't have any proof of concept or RFC patches to share. But that will happen soon.