On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 06:30:15PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used by cpufreq drivers then.
This patch uses these generic routines for this driver.
Cc: Andrew Lunn andrew@lunn.ch Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 22 +++------------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Hi Viresh
You can add:
Tested-by: Andrew Lunn andrew@lunn.ch
to
[PATCH 069/228] cpufreq: kirkwood: Use generic cpufreq routines [PATCH 107/228] cpufreq: kirkwood: don't initialize part of policy that is set by core [PATCH 161/228] cpufreq: kirkwood: Convert to light weight ->target_index() routine [PATCH 195/228] cpufreq: kirkwood: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
It does however require the patch:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg273378.html
but this is not because of this patch series, it was already broken.
Thanks Andrew