This patchset adds DT nodes for FIMD and DP controller for Exynos5420 based SMDK.
It moves all common properties of FIMD and DP controller DT node specific to Exynos5 Socs like 5250 and 5420 to exynos5.dtsi file.
It also adds required PM domain DT nodes for exynos5420.
Is rebased on branch kgene's "for-next" https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git/log/?h=...
The DP PHY DT Node is based on Jingoo Han's inflight patchset at http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/664...
changes since v1: - Addressed comments given by Tomasz Figa tomasz.figa@gmail.com and Ajay kumar ajaynumb@gmail.com
Vikas Sajjan (6): ARM: dts: Move display-timimg information inside FIMD DT node for exynos5250 ARM: dts: Update FIMD DT node for Exynos5 SoCs ARM: dts: Add FIMD DT node to exynos5420 DTS files ARM: dts: Update DP controller DT Node for Exynos5 based SoCs ARM: dts: Add DP controller DT node to exynos5420 SoC ARM: dts: Add pin state information for DP HPD support to Exynos5420
Yadwinder Singh Brar (1): ARM: dts: Add basic PM domains for EXYNOS5420
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 21 +++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 4 ++- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 32 +++++++++-------- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 28 ++++++--------- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi | 7 ++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts | 31 ++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 7 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
As the display-timing information is parsed by FIMD driver, it makes sense to move the display-timimg DT node inside FIMD DT node for exynos5250
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan vikas.sajjan@linaro.org --- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 29 ++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts index 49f18c2..d176dbb 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts @@ -262,19 +262,22 @@ pinctrl-0 = <&dp_hpd>; };
- display-timings { - native-mode = <&timing0>; - timing0: timing@0 { - /* 1280x800 */ - clock-frequency = <50000>; - hactive = <1280>; - vactive = <800>; - hfront-porch = <4>; - hback-porch = <4>; - hsync-len = <4>; - vback-porch = <4>; - vfront-porch = <4>; - vsync-len = <4>; + fimd@14400000 { + status = "okay"; + display-timings { + native-mode = <&timing0>; + timing0: timing@0 { + /* 1280x800 */ + clock-frequency = <50000>; + hactive = <1280>; + vactive = <800>; + hfront-porch = <4>; + hback-porch = <4>; + hsync-len = <4>; + vback-porch = <4>; + vfront-porch = <4>; + vsync-len = <4>; + }; }; };
Hi Vikas,
On Tuesday 30 of July 2013 16:49:32 Vikas Sajjan wrote:
As the display-timing information is parsed by FIMD driver, it makes sense to move the display-timimg DT node inside FIMD DT node for exynos5250
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan vikas.sajjan@linaro.org
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 29 ++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts index 49f18c2..d176dbb 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts @@ -262,19 +262,22 @@ pinctrl-0 = <&dp_hpd>; };
- display-timings {
native-mode = <&timing0>;timing0: timing@0 {/* 1280x800 */clock-frequency = <50000>;hactive = <1280>;vactive = <800>;hfront-porch = <4>;hback-porch = <4>;hsync-len = <4>;vback-porch = <4>;vfront-porch = <4>;vsync-len = <4>;
- fimd@14400000 {
status = "okay";display-timings {native-mode = <&timing0>;timing0: timing@0 {/* 1280x800 */clock-frequency = <50000>;hactive = <1280>;vactive = <800>;hfront-porch = <4>;hback-porch = <4>;hsync-len = <4>;vback-porch = <4>;vfront-porch = <4>;vsync-len = <4>;};
Looks good to me, but I would like some other people from the device tree mailing list to comment on node naming: Do we want to conform to the recommendation of ePAPR about node naming, which states that node names should be generic, not platform specific or we are free to ignore it?
Best regards, Tomasz
Hi All,
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Tomasz Figa t.figa@samsung.com wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On Tuesday 30 of July 2013 16:49:32 Vikas Sajjan wrote:
As the display-timing information is parsed by FIMD driver, it makes sense to move the display-timimg DT node inside FIMD DT node for exynos5250
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan vikas.sajjan@linaro.org
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 29 ++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts index 49f18c2..d176dbb 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts @@ -262,19 +262,22 @@ pinctrl-0 = <&dp_hpd>; };
display-timings {native-mode = <&timing0>;timing0: timing@0 {/* 1280x800 */clock-frequency = <50000>;hactive = <1280>;vactive = <800>;hfront-porch = <4>;hback-porch = <4>;hsync-len = <4>;vback-porch = <4>;vfront-porch = <4>;vsync-len = <4>;
fimd@14400000 {status = "okay";display-timings {native-mode = <&timing0>;timing0: timing@0 {/* 1280x800 */clock-frequency = <50000>;hactive = <1280>;vactive = <800>;hfront-porch = <4>;hback-porch = <4>;hsync-len = <4>;vback-porch = <4>;vfront-porch = <4>;vsync-len = <4>;}; }; };Looks good to me, but I would like some other people from the device tree mailing list to comment on node naming: Do we want to conform to the recommendation of ePAPR about node naming, which states that node names should be generic, not platform specific or we are free to ignore it?
Any more comments on this series.
Best regards, Tomasz
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 5 August 2013 15:34, Vikas Sajjan sajjan.linux@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Tomasz Figa t.figa@samsung.com wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On Tuesday 30 of July 2013 16:49:32 Vikas Sajjan wrote:
As the display-timing information is parsed by FIMD driver, it makes sense to move the display-timimg DT node inside FIMD DT node for exynos5250
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan vikas.sajjan@linaro.org
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 29 ++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts index 49f18c2..d176dbb 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts @@ -262,19 +262,22 @@ pinctrl-0 = <&dp_hpd>; };
display-timings {native-mode = <&timing0>;timing0: timing@0 {/* 1280x800 */clock-frequency = <50000>;hactive = <1280>;vactive = <800>;hfront-porch = <4>;hback-porch = <4>;hsync-len = <4>;vback-porch = <4>;vfront-porch = <4>;vsync-len = <4>;
fimd@14400000 {status = "okay";display-timings {native-mode = <&timing0>;timing0: timing@0 {/* 1280x800 */clock-frequency = <50000>;hactive = <1280>;vactive = <800>;hfront-porch = <4>;hback-porch = <4>;hsync-len = <4>;vback-porch = <4>;vfront-porch = <4>;vsync-len = <4>;}; }; };Looks good to me, but I would like some other people from the device tree mailing list to comment on node naming: Do we want to conform to the recommendation of ePAPR about node naming, which states that node names should be generic, not platform specific or we are free to ignore it?
Any more comments on this series.
One trivial typo in patch subject and commit message: s/timimg/timing
Hi Kukjin,
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Sachin Kamat sachin.kamat@linaro.org wrote:
On 5 August 2013 15:34, Vikas Sajjan sajjan.linux@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Tomasz Figa t.figa@samsung.com wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On Tuesday 30 of July 2013 16:49:32 Vikas Sajjan wrote:
As the display-timing information is parsed by FIMD driver, it makes sense to move the display-timimg DT node inside FIMD DT node for exynos5250
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan vikas.sajjan@linaro.org
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 29 ++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts index 49f18c2..d176dbb 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts @@ -262,19 +262,22 @@ pinctrl-0 = <&dp_hpd>; };
display-timings {native-mode = <&timing0>;timing0: timing@0 {/* 1280x800 */clock-frequency = <50000>;hactive = <1280>;vactive = <800>;hfront-porch = <4>;hback-porch = <4>;hsync-len = <4>;vback-porch = <4>;vfront-porch = <4>;vsync-len = <4>;
fimd@14400000 {status = "okay";display-timings {native-mode = <&timing0>;timing0: timing@0 {/* 1280x800 */clock-frequency = <50000>;hactive = <1280>;vactive = <800>;hfront-porch = <4>;hback-porch = <4>;hsync-len = <4>;vback-porch = <4>;vfront-porch = <4>;vsync-len = <4>;}; }; };Looks good to me, but I would like some other people from the device tree mailing list to comment on node naming: Do we want to conform to the recommendation of ePAPR about node naming, which states that node names should be generic, not platform specific or we are free to ignore it?
Any more comments on this series.
One trivial typo in patch subject and commit message: s/timimg/timing
Can you apply this series (by correcting typo s/timimg/timing) OR you want me to respin V3 with this typo correction.
-- With warm regards, Sachin
Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On Tuesday 30 of July 2013 16:49:32 Vikas Sajjan wrote:
As the display-timing information is parsed by FIMD driver, it makes sense to move the display-timimg DT node inside FIMD DT node for exynos5250
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan vikas.sajjan@linaro.org
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 29 ++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts index 49f18c2..d176dbb 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts @@ -262,19 +262,22 @@ pinctrl-0 = <&dp_hpd>; };
- display-timings {
native-mode = <&timing0>;timing0: timing@0 {/* 1280x800 */clock-frequency = <50000>;hactive = <1280>;vactive = <800>;hfront-porch = <4>;hback-porch = <4>;hsync-len = <4>;vback-porch = <4>;vfront-porch = <4>;vsync-len = <4>;
- fimd@14400000 {
status = "okay";display-timings {native-mode = <&timing0>;timing0: timing@0 {/* 1280x800 */clock-frequency = <50000>;hactive = <1280>;vactive = <800>;hfront-porch = <4>;hback-porch = <4>;hsync-len = <4>;vback-porch = <4>;vfront-porch = <4>;vsync-len = <4>;};Looks good to me, but I would like some other people from the device tree mailing list to comment on node naming: Do we want to conform to the recommendation of ePAPR about node naming, which states that node names should be generic, not platform specific or we are free to ignore it?
The name of node looks good to me and the name had been being used for a long time, and if we change that now, that will cause the bigger confusion.
- Kukjin
On Wednesday 14 of August 2013 14:56:55 Kukjin Kim wrote:
Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On Tuesday 30 of July 2013 16:49:32 Vikas Sajjan wrote:
As the display-timing information is parsed by FIMD driver, it makes sense to move the display-timimg DT node inside FIMD DT node for exynos5250
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan vikas.sajjan@linaro.org
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 29
++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts index 49f18c2..d176dbb 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts @@ -262,19 +262,22 @@
pinctrl-0 = <&dp_hpd>;};
- display-timings {
native-mode = <&timing0>;timing0: timing@0 {/* 1280x800 */clock-frequency = <50000>;hactive = <1280>;vactive = <800>;hfront-porch = <4>;hback-porch = <4>;hsync-len = <4>;vback-porch = <4>;vfront-porch = <4>;vsync-len = <4>;
fimd@14400000 {
status = "okay";display-timings {native-mode = <&timing0>;timing0: timing@0 {/* 1280x800 */clock-frequency = <50000>;hactive = <1280>;vactive = <800>;hfront-porch = <4>;hback-porch = <4>;hsync-len = <4>;vback-porch = <4>;vfront-porch = <4>;vsync-len = <4>;};};
};
Looks good to me, but I would like some other people from the device tree mailing list to comment on node naming: Do we want to conform to the recommendation of ePAPR about node naming, which states that node names should be generic, not platform specific or we are free to ignore it?
The name of node looks good to me and the name had been being used for a long time
Like a lot of things used in device trees of ARM platforms, since we did not have any proper processes defined for creating device tree bindings and device trees themselves, including any recommended set of good practices.
We are now trying to define all of this and so it's time to rethink all the DT related things that has been added for ARM platforms since the time DT for ARM was introduced and make sure that everything is reasonable.
, and if we change that now, that will cause the bigger confusion.
Still, I think this patch can go as is and node naming can be fixed in separate patches, including any other quirks of Exynos device trees.
So, for the whole series:
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa t.figa@samsung.com
Best regards, Tomasz
Hi Tomasz,
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tomasz Figa tomasz.figa@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 14 of August 2013 14:56:55 Kukjin Kim wrote:
Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On Tuesday 30 of July 2013 16:49:32 Vikas Sajjan wrote:
As the display-timing information is parsed by FIMD driver, it makes sense to move the display-timimg DT node inside FIMD DT node for exynos5250
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan vikas.sajjan@linaro.org
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 29
++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts index 49f18c2..d176dbb 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts @@ -262,19 +262,22 @@
pinctrl-0 = <&dp_hpd>;};
- display-timings {
native-mode = <&timing0>;timing0: timing@0 {/* 1280x800 */clock-frequency = <50000>;hactive = <1280>;vactive = <800>;hfront-porch = <4>;hback-porch = <4>;hsync-len = <4>;vback-porch = <4>;vfront-porch = <4>;vsync-len = <4>;
fimd@14400000 {
status = "okay";display-timings {native-mode = <&timing0>;timing0: timing@0 {/* 1280x800 */clock-frequency = <50000>;hactive = <1280>;vactive = <800>;hfront-porch = <4>;hback-porch = <4>;hsync-len = <4>;vback-porch = <4>;vfront-porch = <4>;vsync-len = <4>;}; };};
Looks good to me, but I would like some other people from the device tree mailing list to comment on node naming: Do we want to conform to the recommendation of ePAPR about node naming, which states that node names should be generic, not platform specific or we are free to ignore it?
The name of node looks good to me and the name had been being used for a long time
Like a lot of things used in device trees of ARM platforms, since we did not have any proper processes defined for creating device tree bindings and device trees themselves, including any recommended set of good practices.
We are now trying to define all of this and so it's time to rethink all the DT related things that has been added for ARM platforms since the time DT for ARM was introduced and make sure that everything is reasonable.
, and if we change that now, that will cause the bigger confusion.
Still, I think this patch can go as is and node naming can be fixed in separate patches, including any other quirks of Exynos device trees.
So, for the whole series:
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa t.figa@samsung.com
Thanks for the review.
Best regards, Tomasz
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Moves the properties of FIMD DT node which are common across Exynos5 based SoCs like Exynos5250 and Exxynos5420 to exynos5.dtsi
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan vikas.sajjan@linaro.org --- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 1 + arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 7 +------ 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi index f65e124..d464b6c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi @@ -108,4 +108,14 @@ interrupts = <0 42 0>; status = "disabled"; }; + + fimd@14400000 { + compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-fimd"; + interrupt-parent = <&combiner>; + reg = <0x14400000 0x40000>; + interrupt-names = "fifo", "vsync", "lcd_sys"; + interrupts = <18 4>, <18 5>, <18 6>; + status = "disabled"; + }; + }; diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts index 96d528d..76825ef 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts @@ -519,6 +519,7 @@ };
fimd: fimd@14400000 { + status = "okay"; display-timings { native-mode = <&timing0>; timing0: timing@0 { diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi index ef57277..238bdb2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi @@ -630,12 +630,7 @@ }; };
- fimd { - compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-fimd"; - interrupt-parent = <&combiner>; - reg = <0x14400000 0x40000>; - interrupt-names = "fifo", "vsync", "lcd_sys"; - interrupts = <18 4>, <18 5>, <18 6>; + fimd@14400000 { clocks = <&clock 133>, <&clock 339>; clock-names = "sclk_fimd", "fimd"; };
Vikas Sajjan wrote:
Moves the properties of FIMD DT node which are common across Exynos5 based SoCs like Exynos5250 and Exxynos5420 to exynos5.dtsi
%s/Exxynos/Exynos
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan vikas.sajjan@linaro.org
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 1 + arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 7 +------ 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi index f65e124..d464b6c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi @@ -108,4 +108,14 @@ interrupts = <0 42 0>; status = "disabled"; };
- fimd@14400000 {
compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-fimd";interrupt-parent = <&combiner>;reg = <0x14400000 0x40000>;interrupt-names = "fifo", "vsync", "lcd_sys";interrupts = <18 4>, <18 5>, <18 6>;status = "disabled";- };
No need last empty line.
}; diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts index 96d528d..76825ef 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts @@ -519,6 +519,7 @@ };
fimd: fimd@14400000 {
status = "okay";diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi index ef57277..238bdb2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi @@ -630,12 +630,7 @@ }; };
- fimd {
compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-fimd";interrupt-parent = <&combiner>;reg = <0x14400000 0x40000>;interrupt-names = "fifo", "vsync", "lcd_sys";interrupts = <18 4>, <18 5>, <18 6>;
- fimd@14400000 { clocks = <&clock 133>, <&clock 339>; clock-names = "sclk_fimd", "fimd"; };
-- 1.7.9.5
But you don't need to repost because let me fix when I apply.
Thanks, Kukjin
Hi Kukjin,
On 14 August 2013 13:03, Kukjin Kim kgene@kernel.org wrote:
Vikas Sajjan wrote:
Moves the properties of FIMD DT node which are common across Exynos5 based SoCs like Exynos5250 and Exxynos5420 to exynos5.dtsi
%s/Exxynos/Exynos
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan vikas.sajjan@linaro.org
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 1 + arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 7 +------ 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi index f65e124..d464b6c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi @@ -108,4 +108,14 @@ interrupts = <0 42 0>; status = "disabled"; };
fimd@14400000 {compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-fimd";interrupt-parent = <&combiner>;reg = <0x14400000 0x40000>;interrupt-names = "fifo", "vsync", "lcd_sys";interrupts = <18 4>, <18 5>, <18 6>;status = "disabled";};No need last empty line.
}; diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts index 96d528d..76825ef 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts @@ -519,6 +519,7 @@ };
fimd: fimd@14400000 {
status = "okay"; display-timings { native-mode = <&timing0>; timing0: timing@0 {diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi index ef57277..238bdb2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi @@ -630,12 +630,7 @@ }; };
fimd {compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-fimd";interrupt-parent = <&combiner>;reg = <0x14400000 0x40000>;interrupt-names = "fifo", "vsync", "lcd_sys";interrupts = <18 4>, <18 5>, <18 6>;
fimd@14400000 { clocks = <&clock 133>, <&clock 339>; clock-names = "sclk_fimd", "fimd"; };-- 1.7.9.5
But you don't need to repost because let me fix when I apply.
OK. Thanks.
Thanks, Kukjin
From: Yadwinder Singh Brar yadi.brar@samsung.com
Add DT nodes for gsc, isp, mfc, disp, mau, g2d and msc PM domains.
Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar yadi.brar@samsung.com --- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi index 8c54c4b..884d8f4 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi @@ -90,6 +90,41 @@ }; };
+ gsc_pd: power-domain@10044000 { + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pd"; + reg = <0x10044000 0x20>; + }; + + isp_pd: power-domain@10044020 { + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pd"; + reg = <0x10044020 0x20>; + }; + + mfc_pd: power-domain@10044060 { + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pd"; + reg = <0x10044060 0x20>; + }; + + disp_pd: power-domain@100440C0 { + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pd"; + reg = <0x100440C0 0x20>; + }; + + mau_pd: power-domain@100440E0 { + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pd"; + reg = <0x100440E0 0x20>; + }; + + g2d_pd: power-domain@10044100 { + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pd"; + reg = <0x10044100 0x20>; + }; + + msc_pd: power-domain@10044120 { + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pd"; + reg = <0x10044120 0x20>; + }; + pinctrl_0: pinctrl@13400000 { compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-pinctrl"; reg = <0x13400000 0x1000>;
Adds FIMD DT node to exynos5420 based SMDK. Also adds display-timimg information node.
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan vikas.sajjan@linaro.org --- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts index 08607df..0c0249c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts @@ -30,4 +30,23 @@ clock-frequency = <24000000>; }; }; + + fimd@14400000 { + status = "okay"; + display-timings { + native-mode = <&timing0>; + timing0: timing@0 { + clock-frequency = <50000>; + hactive = <2560>; + vactive = <1600>; + hfront-porch = <48>; + hback-porch = <80>; + hsync-len = <32>; + vback-porch = <16>; + vfront-porch = <8>; + vsync-len = <6>; + }; + }; + }; + }; diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi index 884d8f4..2f98c89 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi @@ -180,4 +180,11 @@ clocks = <&clock 260>, <&clock 131>; clock-names = "uart", "clk_uart_baud0"; }; + + fimd@14400000 { + samsung,power-domain = <&disp_pd>; + clocks = <&clock 147>, <&clock 421>; + clock-names = "sclk_fimd", "fimd"; + }; + };
Moves the properties of DP controller to exynos5.dtsi which are common across exynos5 SoCs like Exynos5250 and Exynos5420.
The PHY DP Node is based on Jingoo Han's jg1.han@samsung.com patch at https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/19189/
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan vikas.sajjan@linaro.org --- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 11 +++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 3 ++- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 3 ++- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 21 +++++++++------------ 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi index d464b6c..213a2d8 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi @@ -118,4 +118,15 @@ status = "disabled"; };
+ dp-controller@145b0000 { + compatible = "samsung,exynos5-dp"; + reg = <0x145b0000 0x1000>; + interrupts = <10 3>; + interrupt-parent = <&combiner>; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + status = "disabled"; + }; + + }; diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts index 76825ef..ce74400 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts @@ -509,13 +509,14 @@ }; };
- dp-controller { + dp-controller@145b0000 { samsung,color-space = <0>; samsung,dynamic-range = <0>; samsung,ycbcr-coeff = <0>; samsung,color-depth = <1>; samsung,link-rate = <0x0a>; samsung,lane-count = <4>; + status = "okay"; };
fimd: fimd@14400000 { diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts index d176dbb..f9ab99c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ samsung,vbus-gpio = <&gpx2 6 0>; };
- dp-controller { + dp-controller@145b0000 { samsung,color-space = <0>; samsung,dynamic-range = <0>; samsung,ycbcr-coeff = <0>; @@ -260,6 +260,7 @@
pinctrl-names = "default"; pinctrl-0 = <&dp_hpd>; + status = "okay"; };
fimd@14400000 { diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi index 238bdb2..1c017dc 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi @@ -614,20 +614,17 @@ interrupts = <0 94 0>; };
- dp-controller { - compatible = "samsung,exynos5-dp"; - reg = <0x145b0000 0x1000>; - interrupts = <10 3>; - interrupt-parent = <&combiner>; + dp_phy: video-phy@10040720 { + compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-dp-video-phy"; + reg = <0x10040720 4>; + #phy-cells = <0>; + }; + + dp-controller@145b0000 { clocks = <&clock 342>; clock-names = "dp"; - #address-cells = <1>; - #size-cells = <0>; - - dptx-phy { - reg = <0x10040720>; - samsung,enable-mask = <1>; - }; + phys = <&dp_phy>; + phy-names = "dp"; };
fimd@14400000 {
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 8:20 PM, Vikas Sajjan wrote:
Moves the properties of DP controller to exynos5.dtsi which are common across exynos5 SoCs like Exynos5250 and Exynos5420.
The PHY DP Node is based on Jingoo Han's jg1.han@samsung.com patch at https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/19189/
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan vikas.sajjan@linaro.org
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 11 +++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 3 ++- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 3 ++- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 21 +++++++++------------ 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
[....]
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi index 238bdb2..1c017dc 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi @@ -614,20 +614,17 @@ interrupts = <0 94 0>; };
- dp-controller {
compatible = "samsung,exynos5-dp";reg = <0x145b0000 0x1000>;interrupts = <10 3>;interrupt-parent = <&combiner>;
- dp_phy: video-phy@10040720 {
compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-dp-video-phy";reg = <0x10040720 4>;#phy-cells = <0>;- };
Oops!!!
This patch should be reverted. Or, fix patch should be re-sent. 'dp phy' driver is not yet merged to mainline kernel.
- dp-controller@145b0000 { clocks = <&clock 342>; clock-names = "dp";
#address-cells = <1>;#size-cells = <0>;dptx-phy {reg = <0x10040720>;samsung,enable-mask = <1>;};
phys = <&dp_phy>;phy-names = "dp";
Thus, 'dptx-phy' node should be used until dp phy driver is merged.
Vikas Sajjan, Please test your patch on real boards when you send your patch.
Best regards, Jingoo Han
Hi Mr. Jingoo Han,
On 26 August 2013 08:27, Jingoo Han jg1.han@samsung.com wrote:
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 8:20 PM, Vikas Sajjan wrote:
Moves the properties of DP controller to exynos5.dtsi which are common across exynos5 SoCs like Exynos5250 and Exynos5420.
The PHY DP Node is based on Jingoo Han's jg1.han@samsung.com patch at https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/19189/
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan vikas.sajjan@linaro.org
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 11 +++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 3 ++- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 3 ++- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 21 +++++++++------------ 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
[....]
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi index 238bdb2..1c017dc 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi @@ -614,20 +614,17 @@ interrupts = <0 94 0>; };
dp-controller {compatible = "samsung,exynos5-dp";reg = <0x145b0000 0x1000>;interrupts = <10 3>;interrupt-parent = <&combiner>;
dp_phy: video-phy@10040720 {compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-dp-video-phy";reg = <0x10040720 4>;#phy-cells = <0>;};Oops!!!
This patch should be reverted. Or, fix patch should be re-sent. 'dp phy' driver is not yet merged to mainline kernel.
As you suggest, since the DP-PHY driver is NOT yet in mainline, we may have to keep this patch reverted till your patch series gets merged to have DP working on exynos5 .
dp-controller@145b0000 { clocks = <&clock 342>; clock-names = "dp";
#address-cells = <1>;#size-cells = <0>;dptx-phy {reg = <0x10040720>;samsung,enable-mask = <1>;};
phys = <&dp_phy>;phy-names = "dp"; };Thus, 'dptx-phy' node should be used until dp phy driver is merged.
Vikas Sajjan, Please test your patch on real boards when you send your patch.
I tested the patch before sending on Exynos5250-SMDK5250 using Kishon Vijay Abraham's series at http://lwn.net/Articles/559487/ which contains DP-PHY driver posted by you 1. phy: Add driver for Exynos DP PHY 2. video: exynos_dp: remove non-DT support for Exynos Display Port 3. video: exynos_dp: Use the generic PHY driver
Best regards, Jingoo Han
Vikas Sajjan wrote:
Hi Mr. Jingoo Han,
On 26 August 2013 08:27, Jingoo Han jg1.han@samsung.com wrote:
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 8:20 PM, Vikas Sajjan wrote:
Moves the properties of DP controller to exynos5.dtsi which are common across exynos5 SoCs like Exynos5250 and Exynos5420.
The PHY DP Node is based on Jingoo Han's jg1.han@samsung.com patch at https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/19189/
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan vikas.sajjan@linaro.org
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 11 +++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 3 ++- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 3 ++- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 21 +++++++++------------ 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
[....]
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
index 238bdb2..1c017dc 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi @@ -614,20 +614,17 @@ interrupts = <0 94 0>; };
dp-controller {compatible = "samsung,exynos5-dp";reg = <0x145b0000 0x1000>;interrupts = <10 3>;interrupt-parent = <&combiner>;
dp_phy: video-phy@10040720 {compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-dp-video-phy";reg = <0x10040720 4>;#phy-cells = <0>;};Oops!!!
This patch should be reverted. Or, fix patch should be re-sent. 'dp phy' driver is not yet merged to mainline kernel.
As you suggest, since the DP-PHY driver is NOT yet in mainline, we may have to keep this patch reverted till your patch series gets merged to have DP working on exynos5 .
OK, got it. Please send patch fixing this issue for v3.12. Of course, we need this from v3.13 which will be including the DP-PHY driver.
Thanks, Kukjin
dp-controller@145b0000 { clocks = <&clock 342>; clock-names = "dp";
#address-cells = <1>;#size-cells = <0>;dptx-phy {reg = <0x10040720>;samsung,enable-mask = <1>;};
phys = <&dp_phy>;phy-names = "dp"; };Thus, 'dptx-phy' node should be used until dp phy driver is merged.
Vikas Sajjan, Please test your patch on real boards when you send your patch.
I tested the patch before sending on Exynos5250-SMDK5250 using Kishon Vijay Abraham's series at http://lwn.net/Articles/559487/ which contains DP-PHY driver posted by you
- phy: Add driver for Exynos DP PHY
- video: exynos_dp: remove non-DT support for Exynos Display Port
- video: exynos_dp: Use the generic PHY driver
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 7:37 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Vikas Sajjan wrote:
Hi Mr. Jingoo Han,
On 26 August 2013 08:27, Jingoo Han jg1.han@samsung.com wrote:
[.....]
Oops!!!
This patch should be reverted. Or, fix patch should be re-sent. 'dp phy' driver is not yet merged to mainline kernel.
As you suggest, since the DP-PHY driver is NOT yet in mainline, we may have to keep this patch reverted till your patch series gets merged to have DP working on exynos5 .
OK, got it. Please send patch fixing this issue for v3.12. Of course, we need this from v3.13 which will be including the DP-PHY driver.
I already sent the patch fixing this. ([PATCH V2] ARM: dts: Remove DP PHY node from exynos5250.dtsi) Please refer to the following. :-)
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg22023.html
Best regards, Jingoo Han
Adds DP controller DT node to exynos5420 SoC
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan vikas.sajjan@linaro.org --- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts | 10 ++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 13 +++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts index 0c0249c..80aa3d4 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts @@ -31,6 +31,16 @@ }; };
+ dp-controller@145b0000 { + samsung,color-space = <0>; + samsung,dynamic-range = <0>; + samsung,ycbcr-coeff = <0>; + samsung,color-depth = <1>; + samsung,link-rate = <0x0a>; + samsung,lane-count = <4>; + status = "okay"; + }; + fimd@14400000 { status = "okay"; display-timings { diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi index 2f98c89..8255db2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi @@ -181,6 +181,19 @@ clock-names = "uart", "clk_uart_baud0"; };
+ dp_phy: video-phy@10040728 { + compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-dp-video-phy"; + reg = <0x10040728 4>; + #phy-cells = <0>; + }; + + dp-controller@145b0000 { + clocks = <&clock 412>; + clock-names = "dp"; + phys = <&dp_phy>; + phy-names = "dp"; + }; + fimd@14400000 { samsung,power-domain = <&disp_pd>; clocks = <&clock 147>, <&clock 421>;
Add pin state information for DP HPD support that requires pin configuration support using pinctrl interface.
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan vikas.sajjan@linaro.org --- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi | 7 +++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi index 5848c42..e695aba 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi @@ -59,6 +59,13 @@ interrupt-controller; #interrupt-cells = <2>; }; + + dp_hpd: dp_hpd { + samsung,pins = "gpx0-7"; + samsung,pin-function = <3>; + samsung,pin-pud = <0>; + samaung,pin-drv = <0>; + }; };
pinctrl@13410000 { diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts index 80aa3d4..123e523 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ };
dp-controller@145b0000 { + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&dp_hpd>; samsung,color-space = <0>; samsung,dynamic-range = <0>; samsung,ycbcr-coeff = <0>;
Vikas Sajjan wrote:
This patchset adds DT nodes for FIMD and DP controller for Exynos5420 based SMDK.
It moves all common properties of FIMD and DP controller DT node specific to Exynos5 Socs like 5250 and 5420 to exynos5.dtsi file.
It also adds required PM domain DT nodes for exynos5420.
Is rebased on branch kgene's "for-next" https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux- samsung.git/log/?h=for-next
The DP PHY DT Node is based on Jingoo Han's inflight patchset at http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input- infrastructure/66435
changes since v1:
- Addressed comments given by Tomasz Figa tomasz.figa@gmail.com
and Ajay kumar ajaynumb@gmail.com
Vikas Sajjan (6): ARM: dts: Move display-timimg information inside FIMD DT node for exynos5250 ARM: dts: Update FIMD DT node for Exynos5 SoCs ARM: dts: Add FIMD DT node to exynos5420 DTS files ARM: dts: Update DP controller DT Node for Exynos5 based SoCs ARM: dts: Add DP controller DT node to exynos5420 SoC ARM: dts: Add pin state information for DP HPD support to Exynos5420
Yadwinder Singh Brar (1): ARM: dts: Add basic PM domains for EXYNOS5420
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 21 +++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 4 ++- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 32 +++++++++-------- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 28 ++++++--------- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi | 7 ++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts | 31 ++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 7 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
-- 1.7.9.5
Looks good to me, will apply this whole series with fix typo, timimg? ;-)
- Kukjin
Hi Kukjin,
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene.kim@samsung.com wrote:
Vikas Sajjan wrote:
This patchset adds DT nodes for FIMD and DP controller for Exynos5420 based SMDK.
It moves all common properties of FIMD and DP controller DT node specific to Exynos5 Socs like 5250 and 5420 to exynos5.dtsi file.
It also adds required PM domain DT nodes for exynos5420.
Is rebased on branch kgene's "for-next" https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux- samsung.git/log/?h=for-next
The DP PHY DT Node is based on Jingoo Han's inflight patchset at http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input- infrastructure/66435
changes since v1: - Addressed comments given by Tomasz Figa tomasz.figa@gmail.com and Ajay kumar ajaynumb@gmail.com
Vikas Sajjan (6): ARM: dts: Move display-timimg information inside FIMD DT node for exynos5250 ARM: dts: Update FIMD DT node for Exynos5 SoCs ARM: dts: Add FIMD DT node to exynos5420 DTS files ARM: dts: Update DP controller DT Node for Exynos5 based SoCs ARM: dts: Add DP controller DT node to exynos5420 SoC ARM: dts: Add pin state information for DP HPD support to Exynos5420
Yadwinder Singh Brar (1): ARM: dts: Add basic PM domains for EXYNOS5420
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 21 +++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 4 ++- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 32 +++++++++-------- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 28 ++++++--------- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi | 7 ++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts | 31 ++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 7 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
-- 1.7.9.5
Looks good to me, will apply this whole series with fix typo, timimg? ;-)
Thanks.
- Kukjin
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
-
Jingoo Han -
Kukjin Kim -
Kukjin Kim -
Sachin Kamat -
Tomasz Figa -
Tomasz Figa -
Vikas Sajjan -
Vikas Sajjan