August 2025 - Linux-stable-mirror

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] xfs: fully decouple XFS_IBULK* flags from XFS_IWALK* flags" failed to apply to 6.16-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.16-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.16.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x d2845519b0723c5d5a0266cbf410495f9b8fd65c # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025081857-swerve-preschool-2c2c@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.16.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From d2845519b0723c5d5a0266cbf410495f9b8fd65c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 14:19:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] xfs: fully decouple XFS_IBULK* flags from XFS_IWALK* flags Fix up xfs_inumbers to now pass in the XFS_IBULK* flags into the flags argument to xfs_inobt_walk, which expects the XFS_IWALK* flags. Currently passing the wrong flags works for non-debug builds because the only XFS_IWALK* flag has the same encoding as the corresponding XFS_IBULK* flag, but in debug builds it can trigger an assert that no incorrect flag is passed. Instead just extra the relevant flag. Fixes: 5b35d922c52798 ("xfs: Decouple XFS_IBULK flags from XFS_IWALK flags") Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> # v5.19 Reported-by: cen zhang <zzzccc427(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cem(a)kernel.org> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c index c8c9b8d8309f..5116842420b2 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c @@ -447,17 +447,21 @@ xfs_inumbers( .breq = breq, }; struct xfs_trans *tp; + unsigned int iwalk_flags = 0; int error = 0; if (xfs_bulkstat_already_done(breq->mp, breq->startino)) return 0; + if (breq->flags & XFS_IBULK_SAME_AG) + iwalk_flags |= XFS_IWALK_SAME_AG; + /* * Grab an empty transaction so that we can use its recursive buffer * locking abilities to detect cycles in the inobt without deadlocking. */ tp = xfs_trans_alloc_empty(breq->mp); - error = xfs_inobt_walk(breq->mp, tp, breq->startino, breq->flags, + error = xfs_inobt_walk(breq->mp, tp, breq->startino, iwalk_flags, xfs_inumbers_walk, breq->icount, &ic); xfs_trans_cancel(tp);

3 months, 2 weeks

2
5
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix subpage deadlock in" failed to apply to 6.16-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.16-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.16.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x ad580dfa388fabb52af033e3f8cc5d04be985e54 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025081814-monsoon-supermom-44bb@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.16.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From ad580dfa388fabb52af033e3f8cc5d04be985e54 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Leo Martins <loemra.dev(a)gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 10:49:16 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix subpage deadlock in try_release_subpage_extent_buffer() There is a potential deadlock that can happen in try_release_subpage_extent_buffer() because the irq-safe xarray spin lock fs_info->buffer_tree is being acquired before the irq-unsafe eb->refs_lock. This leads to the potential race: // T1 (random eb->refs user) // T2 (release folio) spin_lock(&eb->refs_lock); // interrupt end_bbio_meta_write() btrfs_meta_folio_clear_writeback() btree_release_folio() folio_test_writeback() //false try_release_extent_buffer() try_release_subpage_extent_buffer() xa_lock_irq(&fs_info->buffer_tree) spin_lock(&eb->refs_lock); // blocked; held by T1 buffer_tree_clear_mark() xas_lock_irqsave() // blocked; held by T2 I believe that the spin lock can safely be replaced by an rcu_read_lock. The xa_for_each loop does not need the spin lock as it's already internally protected by the rcu_read_lock. The extent buffer is also protected by the rcu_read_lock so it won't be freed before we take the eb->refs_lock and check the ref count. The rcu_read_lock is taken and released every iteration, just like the spin lock, which means we're not protected against concurrent insertions into the xarray. This is fine because we rely on folio->private to detect if there are any ebs remaining in the folio. There is already some precedent for this with find_extent_buffer_nolock, which loads an extent buffer from the xarray with only rcu_read_lock. lockdep warning: ===================================================== WARNING: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected 6.16.0-0_fbk701_debug_rc0_123_g4c06e63b9203 #1 Tainted: G E N ----------------------------------------------------- kswapd0/66 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire: ffff000011ffd600 (&eb->refs_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: try_release_extent_buffer+0x18c/0x560 and this task is already holding: ffff0000c1d91b88 (&buffer_xa_class){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: try_release_extent_buffer+0x13c/0x560 which would create a new lock dependency: (&buffer_xa_class){-.-.}-{3:3} -> (&eb->refs_lock){+.+.}-{3:3} but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock: (&buffer_xa_class){-.-.}-{3:3} ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-safe at: lock_acquire+0x178/0x358 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x60/0x88 buffer_tree_clear_mark+0xc4/0x160 end_bbio_meta_write+0x238/0x398 btrfs_bio_end_io+0x1f8/0x330 btrfs_orig_write_end_io+0x1c4/0x2c0 bio_endio+0x63c/0x678 blk_update_request+0x1c4/0xa00 blk_mq_end_request+0x54/0x88 virtblk_request_done+0x124/0x1d0 blk_mq_complete_request+0x84/0xa0 virtblk_done+0x130/0x238 vring_interrupt+0x130/0x288 __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x1e8/0x708 handle_irq_event+0x98/0x1b0 handle_fasteoi_irq+0x264/0x7c0 generic_handle_domain_irq+0xa4/0x108 gic_handle_irq+0x7c/0x1a0 do_interrupt_handler+0xe4/0x148 el1_interrupt+0x30/0x50 el1h_64_irq_handler+0x14/0x20 el1h_64_irq+0x6c/0x70 _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x38/0x70 __run_timer_base+0xdc/0x5e0 run_timer_softirq+0xa0/0x138 handle_softirqs.llvm.13542289750107964195+0x32c/0xbd0 ____do_softirq.llvm.17674514681856217165+0x18/0x28 call_on_irq_stack+0x24/0x30 __irq_exit_rcu+0x164/0x430 irq_exit_rcu+0x18/0x88 el1_interrupt+0x34/0x50 el1h_64_irq_handler+0x14/0x20 el1h_64_irq+0x6c/0x70 arch_local_irq_enable+0x4/0x8 do_idle+0x1a0/0x3b8 cpu_startup_entry+0x60/0x80 rest_init+0x204/0x228 start_kernel+0x394/0x3f0 __primary_switched+0x8c/0x8958 to a HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: (&eb->refs_lock){+.+.}-{3:3} ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe at: ... lock_acquire+0x178/0x358 _raw_spin_lock+0x4c/0x68 free_extent_buffer_stale+0x2c/0x170 btrfs_read_sys_array+0x1b0/0x338 open_ctree+0xeb0/0x1df8 btrfs_get_tree+0xb60/0x1110 vfs_get_tree+0x8c/0x250 fc_mount+0x20/0x98 btrfs_get_tree+0x4a4/0x1110 vfs_get_tree+0x8c/0x250 do_new_mount+0x1e0/0x6c0 path_mount+0x4ec/0xa58 __arm64_sys_mount+0x370/0x490 invoke_syscall+0x6c/0x208 el0_svc_common+0x14c/0x1b8 do_el0_svc+0x4c/0x60 el0_svc+0x4c/0x160 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x70/0x100 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x170 other info that might help us debug this: Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&eb->refs_lock); local_irq_disable(); lock(&buffer_xa_class); lock(&eb->refs_lock); <Interrupt> lock(&buffer_xa_class); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by kswapd0/66: #0: ffff800085506e40 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0xe8/0xe50 #1: ffff0000c1d91b88 (&buffer_xa_class){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: try_release_extent_buffer+0x13c/0x560 Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst#:~:text… Fixes: 19d7f65f032f ("btrfs: convert the buffer_radix to an xarray") CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 6.16+ Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris(a)bur.io> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Leo Martins <loemra.dev(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index 835b0deef9bb..f23d75986947 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -4331,15 +4331,18 @@ static int try_release_subpage_extent_buffer(struct folio *folio) unsigned long end = index + (PAGE_SIZE >> fs_info->nodesize_bits) - 1; int ret; - xa_lock_irq(&fs_info->buffer_tree); + rcu_read_lock(); xa_for_each_range(&fs_info->buffer_tree, index, eb, start, end) { /* * The same as try_release_extent_buffer(), to ensure the eb * won't disappear out from under us. */ spin_lock(&eb->refs_lock); + rcu_read_unlock(); + if (refcount_read(&eb->refs) != 1 || extent_buffer_under_io(eb)) { spin_unlock(&eb->refs_lock); + rcu_read_lock(); continue; } @@ -4358,11 +4361,10 @@ static int try_release_subpage_extent_buffer(struct folio *folio) * check the folio private at the end. And * release_extent_buffer() will release the refs_lock. */ - xa_unlock_irq(&fs_info->buffer_tree); release_extent_buffer(eb); - xa_lock_irq(&fs_info->buffer_tree); + rcu_read_lock(); } - xa_unlock_irq(&fs_info->buffer_tree); + rcu_read_unlock(); /* * Finally to check if we have cleared folio private, as if we have @@ -4375,7 +4377,6 @@ static int try_release_subpage_extent_buffer(struct folio *folio) ret = 0; spin_unlock(&folio->mapping->i_private_lock); return ret; - } int try_release_extent_buffer(struct folio *folio)

3 months, 2 weeks

2
4
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: abort transaction on unexpected eb generation at" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 33e8f24b52d2796b8cfb28c19a1a7dd6476323a8 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025081821-startling-skiing-ca6d@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 33e8f24b52d2796b8cfb28c19a1a7dd6476323a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 11:07:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: abort transaction on unexpected eb generation at btrfs_copy_root() If we find an unexpected generation for the extent buffer we are cloning at btrfs_copy_root(), we just WARN_ON() and don't error out and abort the transaction, meaning we allow to persist metadata with an unexpected generation. Instead of warning only, abort the transaction and return -EUCLEAN. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Daniel Vacek <neelx(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c index ae6cd77282f5..a5ee6ce312cf 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c @@ -283,7 +283,14 @@ int btrfs_copy_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, write_extent_buffer_fsid(cow, fs_info->fs_devices->metadata_uuid); - WARN_ON(btrfs_header_generation(buf) > trans->transid); + if (unlikely(btrfs_header_generation(buf) > trans->transid)) { + btrfs_tree_unlock(cow); + free_extent_buffer(cow); + ret = -EUCLEAN; + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret); + return ret; + } + if (new_root_objectid == BTRFS_TREE_RELOC_OBJECTID) { ret = btrfs_inc_ref(trans, root, cow, 1); if (ret)

3 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: abort transaction on unexpected eb generation at" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.12.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 33e8f24b52d2796b8cfb28c19a1a7dd6476323a8 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025081815-strut-suspend-7a53@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.12.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 33e8f24b52d2796b8cfb28c19a1a7dd6476323a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 11:07:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: abort transaction on unexpected eb generation at btrfs_copy_root() If we find an unexpected generation for the extent buffer we are cloning at btrfs_copy_root(), we just WARN_ON() and don't error out and abort the transaction, meaning we allow to persist metadata with an unexpected generation. Instead of warning only, abort the transaction and return -EUCLEAN. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Daniel Vacek <neelx(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c index ae6cd77282f5..a5ee6ce312cf 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c @@ -283,7 +283,14 @@ int btrfs_copy_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, write_extent_buffer_fsid(cow, fs_info->fs_devices->metadata_uuid); - WARN_ON(btrfs_header_generation(buf) > trans->transid); + if (unlikely(btrfs_header_generation(buf) > trans->transid)) { + btrfs_tree_unlock(cow); + free_extent_buffer(cow); + ret = -EUCLEAN; + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret); + return ret; + } + if (new_root_objectid == BTRFS_TREE_RELOC_OBJECTID) { ret = btrfs_inc_ref(trans, root, cow, 1); if (ret)

3 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: always abort transaction on failure to add block group" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 1f06c942aa709d397cf6bed577a0d10a61509667 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025081810-washer-purchase-bdf5@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 1f06c942aa709d397cf6bed577a0d10a61509667 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2025 19:44:03 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: always abort transaction on failure to add block group to free space tree Only one of the callers of __add_block_group_free_space() aborts the transaction if the call fails, while the others don't do it and it's either never done up the call chain or much higher in the call chain. So make sure we abort the transaction at __add_block_group_free_space() if it fails, which brings a couple benefits: 1) If some call chain never aborts the transaction, we avoid having some metadata inconsistency because BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_NEEDS_FREE_SPACE is cleared when we enter __add_block_group_free_space() and therefore __add_block_group_free_space() is never called again to add the block group items to the free space tree, since the function is only called when that flag is set in a block group; 2) If the call chain already aborts the transaction, then we get a better trace that points to the exact step from __add_block_group_free_space() which failed, which is better for analysis. So abort the transaction at __add_block_group_free_space() if any of its steps fails. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 6.6+ Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris(a)bur.io> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c index 9eb9858e8e99..af005fb4b676 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c @@ -1431,12 +1431,17 @@ static int __add_block_group_free_space(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, set_bit(BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_FREE_SPACE_ADDED, &block_group->runtime_flags); ret = add_new_free_space_info(trans, block_group, path); - if (ret) + if (ret) { + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret); return ret; + } - return __add_to_free_space_tree(trans, block_group, path, - block_group->start, - block_group->length); + ret = __add_to_free_space_tree(trans, block_group, path, + block_group->start, block_group->length); + if (ret) + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret); + + return 0; } int add_block_group_free_space(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, @@ -1461,9 +1466,6 @@ int add_block_group_free_space(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, } ret = __add_block_group_free_space(trans, block_group, path); - if (ret) - btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret); - out: btrfs_free_path(path); mutex_unlock(&block_group->free_space_lock);

3 months, 2 weeks

2
2
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: abort transaction on unexpected eb generation at" failed to apply to 6.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 33e8f24b52d2796b8cfb28c19a1a7dd6476323a8 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025081815-mothproof-embody-49e3@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 33e8f24b52d2796b8cfb28c19a1a7dd6476323a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 11:07:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: abort transaction on unexpected eb generation at btrfs_copy_root() If we find an unexpected generation for the extent buffer we are cloning at btrfs_copy_root(), we just WARN_ON() and don't error out and abort the transaction, meaning we allow to persist metadata with an unexpected generation. Instead of warning only, abort the transaction and return -EUCLEAN. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Daniel Vacek <neelx(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c index ae6cd77282f5..a5ee6ce312cf 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c @@ -283,7 +283,14 @@ int btrfs_copy_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, write_extent_buffer_fsid(cow, fs_info->fs_devices->metadata_uuid); - WARN_ON(btrfs_header_generation(buf) > trans->transid); + if (unlikely(btrfs_header_generation(buf) > trans->transid)) { + btrfs_tree_unlock(cow); + free_extent_buffer(cow); + ret = -EUCLEAN; + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret); + return ret; + } + if (new_root_objectid == BTRFS_TREE_RELOC_OBJECTID) { ret = btrfs_inc_ref(trans, root, cow, 1); if (ret)

3 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

[PATCH net 0/8] mptcp: misc fixes for v6.17-rc

by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)

Here are various fixes: - Patch 1: Better handling SKB extension allocation failures. A fix for v5.7. - Patches 2, 3: Avoid resetting MPTCP limits when flushing MPTCP endpoints. With a validation in the selftests. Fixes for v5.7. - Patches 4, 5, 6: Disallow '0' as ADD_ADDR retransmission timeout. With a preparation patch, and a validation in the selftests. Fixes for v5.11. - Patches 8, 9: Fix C23 extension warnings in the selftests, spotted by GCC. Fixes for v6.16. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe(a)kernel.org> --- Christoph Paasch (1): mptcp: drop skb if MPTCP skb extension allocation fails Geliang Tang (3): mptcp: remove duplicate sk_reset_timer call mptcp: disable add_addr retransmission when timeout is 0 selftests: mptcp: disable add_addr retrans in endpoint_tests Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) (4): mptcp: pm: kernel: flush: do not reset ADD_ADDR limit selftests: mptcp: pm: check flush doesn't reset limits selftests: mptcp: connect: fix C23 extension warning selftests: mptcp: sockopt: fix C23 extension warning Documentation/networking/mptcp-sysctl.rst | 2 ++ net/mptcp/options.c | 6 ++++-- net/mptcp/pm.c | 18 ++++++++++++------ net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c | 1 - tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_connect.c | 5 +++-- tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_inq.c | 5 +++-- tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_sockopt.c | 5 +++-- tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.sh | 1 + 9 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) --- base-commit: 065c31f2c6915b38f45b1c817b31f41f62eaa774 change-id: 20250815-net-mptcp-misc-fixes-6-17-rc2-d18b2437e8d4 Best regards, -- Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe(a)kernel.org>

3 months, 2 weeks

4
10
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: always abort transaction on failure to add block group" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.12.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 1f06c942aa709d397cf6bed577a0d10a61509667 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025081809-unwatched-rejoicing-21e4@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.12.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 1f06c942aa709d397cf6bed577a0d10a61509667 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2025 19:44:03 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: always abort transaction on failure to add block group to free space tree Only one of the callers of __add_block_group_free_space() aborts the transaction if the call fails, while the others don't do it and it's either never done up the call chain or much higher in the call chain. So make sure we abort the transaction at __add_block_group_free_space() if it fails, which brings a couple benefits: 1) If some call chain never aborts the transaction, we avoid having some metadata inconsistency because BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_NEEDS_FREE_SPACE is cleared when we enter __add_block_group_free_space() and therefore __add_block_group_free_space() is never called again to add the block group items to the free space tree, since the function is only called when that flag is set in a block group; 2) If the call chain already aborts the transaction, then we get a better trace that points to the exact step from __add_block_group_free_space() which failed, which is better for analysis. So abort the transaction at __add_block_group_free_space() if any of its steps fails. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 6.6+ Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris(a)bur.io> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c index 9eb9858e8e99..af005fb4b676 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c @@ -1431,12 +1431,17 @@ static int __add_block_group_free_space(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, set_bit(BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_FREE_SPACE_ADDED, &block_group->runtime_flags); ret = add_new_free_space_info(trans, block_group, path); - if (ret) + if (ret) { + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret); return ret; + } - return __add_to_free_space_tree(trans, block_group, path, - block_group->start, - block_group->length); + ret = __add_to_free_space_tree(trans, block_group, path, + block_group->start, block_group->length); + if (ret) + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret); + + return 0; } int add_block_group_free_space(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, @@ -1461,9 +1466,6 @@ int add_block_group_free_space(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, } ret = __add_block_group_free_space(trans, block_group, path); - if (ret) - btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret); - out: btrfs_free_path(path); mutex_unlock(&block_group->free_space_lock);

3 months, 2 weeks

2
2
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: abort transaction on unexpected eb generation at" failed to apply to 6.16-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.16-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.16.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 33e8f24b52d2796b8cfb28c19a1a7dd6476323a8 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025081814-cotton-endpoint-c7b3@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.16.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 33e8f24b52d2796b8cfb28c19a1a7dd6476323a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 11:07:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: abort transaction on unexpected eb generation at btrfs_copy_root() If we find an unexpected generation for the extent buffer we are cloning at btrfs_copy_root(), we just WARN_ON() and don't error out and abort the transaction, meaning we allow to persist metadata with an unexpected generation. Instead of warning only, abort the transaction and return -EUCLEAN. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Daniel Vacek <neelx(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c index ae6cd77282f5..a5ee6ce312cf 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c @@ -283,7 +283,14 @@ int btrfs_copy_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, write_extent_buffer_fsid(cow, fs_info->fs_devices->metadata_uuid); - WARN_ON(btrfs_header_generation(buf) > trans->transid); + if (unlikely(btrfs_header_generation(buf) > trans->transid)) { + btrfs_tree_unlock(cow); + free_extent_buffer(cow); + ret = -EUCLEAN; + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret); + return ret; + } + if (new_root_objectid == BTRFS_TREE_RELOC_OBJECTID) { ret = btrfs_inc_ref(trans, root, cow, 1); if (ret)

3 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: always abort transaction on failure to add block group" failed to apply to 6.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 1f06c942aa709d397cf6bed577a0d10a61509667 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025081808-companion-arson-989c@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 1f06c942aa709d397cf6bed577a0d10a61509667 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2025 19:44:03 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: always abort transaction on failure to add block group to free space tree Only one of the callers of __add_block_group_free_space() aborts the transaction if the call fails, while the others don't do it and it's either never done up the call chain or much higher in the call chain. So make sure we abort the transaction at __add_block_group_free_space() if it fails, which brings a couple benefits: 1) If some call chain never aborts the transaction, we avoid having some metadata inconsistency because BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_NEEDS_FREE_SPACE is cleared when we enter __add_block_group_free_space() and therefore __add_block_group_free_space() is never called again to add the block group items to the free space tree, since the function is only called when that flag is set in a block group; 2) If the call chain already aborts the transaction, then we get a better trace that points to the exact step from __add_block_group_free_space() which failed, which is better for analysis. So abort the transaction at __add_block_group_free_space() if any of its steps fails. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 6.6+ Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris(a)bur.io> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c index 9eb9858e8e99..af005fb4b676 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c @@ -1431,12 +1431,17 @@ static int __add_block_group_free_space(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, set_bit(BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_FREE_SPACE_ADDED, &block_group->runtime_flags); ret = add_new_free_space_info(trans, block_group, path); - if (ret) + if (ret) { + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret); return ret; + } - return __add_to_free_space_tree(trans, block_group, path, - block_group->start, - block_group->length); + ret = __add_to_free_space_tree(trans, block_group, path, + block_group->start, block_group->length); + if (ret) + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret); + + return 0; } int add_block_group_free_space(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, @@ -1461,9 +1466,6 @@ int add_block_group_free_space(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, } ret = __add_block_group_free_space(trans, block_group, path); - if (ret) - btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret); - out: btrfs_free_path(path); mutex_unlock(&block_group->free_space_lock);

3 months, 2 weeks

2
2
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror August 2025