From: Daniel Jurgens <danielj(a)mellanox.com>
For now the only LSM security enforcement mechanism available is
specific to InfiniBand. Bypass enforcement for non-IB link types.
This fixes a regression where modify_qp fails for iWARP because
querying the PKEY returns -EINVAL.
Cc: Paul Moore <paul(a)paul-moore.com>
Cc: Don Dutile <ddutile(a)redhat.com>
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat(a)chelsio.com>
Fixes: d291f1a65232("IB/core: Enforce PKey security on QPs")
Fixes: 47a2b338fe63("IB/core: Enforce security on management datagrams")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj(a)mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav(a)mellanox.com>
Tested-by: Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat(a)chelsio.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon(a)kernel.org>
---
drivers/infiniband/core/security.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/security.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/security.c
index 23278ed5be45..4b7fd68e1174 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/security.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/security.c
@@ -417,8 +417,17 @@ void ib_close_shared_qp_security(struct ib_qp_security *sec)
int ib_create_qp_security(struct ib_qp *qp, struct ib_device *dev)
{
+ u8 i = rdma_start_port(dev);
+ bool is_ib = false;
int ret;
+ while (i <= rdma_end_port(dev) && !is_ib)
+ is_ib = rdma_protocol_ib(dev, i++);
+
+ /* If this isn't an IB device don't create the security context */
+ if (!is_ib)
+ return 0;
+
qp->qp_sec = kzalloc(sizeof(*qp->qp_sec), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!qp->qp_sec)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -441,6 +450,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ib_create_qp_security);
void ib_destroy_qp_security_begin(struct ib_qp_security *sec)
{
+ /* Return if not IB */
+ if (!sec)
+ return;
+
mutex_lock(&sec->mutex);
/* Remove the QP from the lists so it won't get added to
@@ -470,6 +483,10 @@ void ib_destroy_qp_security_abort(struct ib_qp_security *sec)
int ret;
int i;
+ /* Return if not IB */
+ if (!sec)
+ return;
+
/* If a concurrent cache update is in progress this
* QP security could be marked for an error state
* transition. Wait for this to complete.
@@ -505,6 +522,10 @@ void ib_destroy_qp_security_end(struct ib_qp_security *sec)
{
int i;
+ /* Return if not IB */
+ if (!sec)
+ return;
+
/* If a concurrent cache update is occurring we must
* wait until this QP security structure is processed
* in the QP to error flow before destroying it because
@@ -565,13 +586,19 @@ int ib_security_modify_qp(struct ib_qp *qp,
bool pps_change = ((qp_attr_mask & (IB_QP_PKEY_INDEX | IB_QP_PORT)) ||
(qp_attr_mask & IB_QP_ALT_PATH));
+ WARN_ONCE((qp_attr_mask & IB_QP_PORT &&
+ rdma_protocol_ib(real_qp->device, qp_attr->port_num) &&
+ !real_qp->qp_sec),
+ "%s: QP security is not initialized for IB QP: %d\n",
+ __func__, real_qp->qp_num);
+
/* The port/pkey settings are maintained only for the real QP. Open
* handles on the real QP will be in the shared_qp_list. When
* enforcing security on the real QP all the shared QPs will be
* checked as well.
*/
- if (pps_change && !special_qp) {
+ if (pps_change && !special_qp` && real_qp->qp_sec) {
mutex_lock(&real_qp->qp_sec->mutex);
new_pps = get_new_pps(real_qp,
qp_attr,
@@ -600,7 +627,7 @@ int ib_security_modify_qp(struct ib_qp *qp,
qp_attr_mask,
udata);
- if (pps_change && !special_qp) {
+ if (pps_change && !special_qpp && real_qp->qp_sec) {
/* Clean up the lists and free the appropriate
* ports_pkeys structure.
*/
@@ -631,6 +658,9 @@ int ib_security_pkey_access(struct ib_device *dev,
u16 pkey;
int ret;
+ if (!rdma_protocol_ib(dev, port_num))
+ return 0;
+
ret = ib_get_cached_pkey(dev, port_num, pkey_index, &pkey);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -665,6 +695,9 @@ int ib_mad_agent_security_setup(struct ib_mad_agent *agent,
{
int ret;
+ if (!rdma_protocol_ib(agent->device, agent->port_num))
+ return 0;
+
ret = security_ib_alloc_security(&agent->security);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -690,6 +723,9 @@ int ib_mad_agent_security_setup(struct ib_mad_agent *agent,
void ib_mad_agent_security_cleanup(struct ib_mad_agent *agent)
{
+ if (!rdma_protocol_ib(agent->device, agent->port_num))
+ return;
+
security_ib_free_security(agent->security);
if (agent->lsm_nb_reg)
unregister_lsm_notifier(&agent->lsm_nb);
@@ -697,6 +733,9 @@ void ib_mad_agent_security_cleanup(struct ib_mad_agent *agent)
int ib_mad_enforce_security(struct ib_mad_agent_private *map, u16 pkey_index)
{
+ if (!rdma_protocol_ib(map->agent.device, map->agent.port_num))
+ return 0;
+
if (map->agent.qp->qp_type == IB_QPT_SMI && !map->agent.smp_allowed)
return -EACCES;
--
2.15.0
Tree/Branch: v3.2.96
Git describe: v3.2.96
Commit: 07a40fa222 Linux 3.2.96
Build Time: 0 min 3 sec
Passed: 0 / 4 ( 0.00 %)
Failed: 4 / 4 (100.00 %)
Errors: 6
Warnings: 20
Section Mismatches: 0
Failed defconfigs:
x86_64-allnoconfig
arm-allmodconfig
arm-allnoconfig
x86_64-defconfig
Errors:
x86_64-allnoconfig
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/scripts/mod/empty.c:1:0: error: code model kernel does not support PIC mode
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/kernel/bounds.c:1:0: error: code model kernel does not support PIC mode
arm-allnoconfig
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:77:7: error: '__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__' undeclared (first use in this function)
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/glue-cache.h:129:2: error: #error Unknown cache maintenance model
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/glue-df.h:107:2: error: #error Unknown data abort handler type
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/glue-pf.h:54:2: error: #error Unknown prefetch abort handler type
x86_64-defconfig
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/scripts/mod/empty.c:1:0: error: code model kernel does not support PIC mode
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/kernel/bounds.c:1:0: error: code model kernel does not support PIC mode
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
defconfigs with issues (other than build errors):
2 warnings 0 mismatches : arm-allmodconfig
19 warnings 0 mismatches : arm-allnoconfig
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Errors summary: 6
2 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/scripts/mod/empty.c:1:0: error: code model kernel does not support PIC mode
2 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/kernel/bounds.c:1:0: error: code model kernel does not support PIC mode
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/glue-pf.h:54:2: error: #error Unknown prefetch abort handler type
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/glue-df.h:107:2: error: #error Unknown data abort handler type
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/glue-cache.h:129:2: error: #error Unknown cache maintenance model
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:77:7: error: '__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__' undeclared (first use in this function)
Warnings Summary: 20
2 .config:27:warning: symbol value '' invalid for PHYS_OFFSET
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h:342:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h:272:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h:265:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h:131:35: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h:127:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h:121:3: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h:120:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h:114:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/swab.h:25:28: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h:82:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h:102:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/irqflags.h:11:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/fpstate.h:32:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/cachetype.h:33:7: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/cachetype.h:28:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/cacheflush.h:196:7: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/cacheflush.h:194:7: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h:217:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
1 /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h:30:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
===============================================================================
Detailed per-defconfig build reports below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
x86_64-allnoconfig : FAIL, 2 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches
Errors:
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/scripts/mod/empty.c:1:0: error: code model kernel does not support PIC mode
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/kernel/bounds.c:1:0: error: code model kernel does not support PIC mode
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
arm-allmodconfig : FAIL, 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 section mismatches
Warnings:
.config:27:warning: symbol value '' invalid for PHYS_OFFSET
.config:27:warning: symbol value '' invalid for PHYS_OFFSET
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
arm-allnoconfig : FAIL, 4 errors, 19 warnings, 0 section mismatches
Errors:
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:77:7: error: '__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__' undeclared (first use in this function)
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/glue-cache.h:129:2: error: #error Unknown cache maintenance model
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/glue-df.h:107:2: error: #error Unknown data abort handler type
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/glue-pf.h:54:2: error: #error Unknown prefetch abort handler type
Warnings:
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/irqflags.h:11:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h:114:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h:120:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h:121:3: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h:127:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h:131:35: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h:265:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h:272:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h:342:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h:217:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/swab.h:25:28: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/fpstate.h:32:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h:82:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h:102:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h:30:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/cachetype.h:28:5: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/cachetype.h:33:7: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/cacheflush.h:194:7: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/arch/arm/include/asm/cacheflush.h:196:7: warning: "__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__" is not defined [-Wundef]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
x86_64-defconfig : FAIL, 2 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches
Errors:
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/scripts/mod/empty.c:1:0: error: code model kernel does not support PIC mode
/home/broonie/build/linux-stable/kernel/bounds.c:1:0: error: code model kernel does not support PIC mode
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Passed with no errors, warnings or mismatches:
Tree/Branch: v3.16.51
Git describe: v3.16.51
Commit: c45c05f42d Linux 3.16.51
Build Time: 37 min 49 sec
Passed: 9 / 9 (100.00 %)
Failed: 0 / 9 ( 0.00 %)
Errors: 0
Warnings: 7
Section Mismatches: 0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
defconfigs with issues (other than build errors):
1 warnings 0 mismatches : arm64-allnoconfig
2 warnings 0 mismatches : arm64-allmodconfig
1 warnings 0 mismatches : arm-multi_v5_defconfig
1 warnings 0 mismatches : arm-multi_v7_defconfig
1 warnings 0 mismatches : x86_64-defconfig
4 warnings 0 mismatches : arm-allmodconfig
1 warnings 0 mismatches : arm-allnoconfig
1 warnings 0 mismatches : x86_64-allnoconfig
3 warnings 0 mismatches : arm64-defconfig
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Warnings Summary: 7
7 ../include/linux/stddef.h:8:14: warning: 'return' with a value, in function returning void
2 ../ipc/sem.c:377:6: warning: '___p1' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
2 ../drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c:1346:17: warning: unused variable 'kdev' [-Wunused-variable]
1 ../drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c:279:10: warning: 'value' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
1 ../drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpfe_capture.c:291:12: warning: 'vpfe_get_ccdc_image_format' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
1 ../drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpfe_capture.c:1718:1: warning: label 'unlock_out' defined but not used [-Wunused-label]
1 ../arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:961:13: warning: 'syscall32_cpu_init' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
===============================================================================
Detailed per-defconfig build reports below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
arm64-allnoconfig : PASS, 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 section mismatches
Warnings:
../include/linux/stddef.h:8:14: warning: 'return' with a value, in function returning void
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
arm64-allmodconfig : PASS, 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 section mismatches
Warnings:
../include/linux/stddef.h:8:14: warning: 'return' with a value, in function returning void
../drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c:1346:17: warning: unused variable 'kdev' [-Wunused-variable]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
arm-multi_v5_defconfig : PASS, 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 section mismatches
Warnings:
../include/linux/stddef.h:8:14: warning: 'return' with a value, in function returning void
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
arm-multi_v7_defconfig : PASS, 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 section mismatches
Warnings:
../include/linux/stddef.h:8:14: warning: 'return' with a value, in function returning void
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
x86_64-defconfig : PASS, 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 section mismatches
Warnings:
../drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c:279:10: warning: 'value' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
arm-allmodconfig : PASS, 0 errors, 4 warnings, 0 section mismatches
Warnings:
../drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpfe_capture.c:1718:1: warning: label 'unlock_out' defined but not used [-Wunused-label]
../drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpfe_capture.c:291:12: warning: 'vpfe_get_ccdc_image_format' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
../include/linux/stddef.h:8:14: warning: 'return' with a value, in function returning void
../drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c:1346:17: warning: unused variable 'kdev' [-Wunused-variable]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
arm-allnoconfig : PASS, 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 section mismatches
Warnings:
../include/linux/stddef.h:8:14: warning: 'return' with a value, in function returning void
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
x86_64-allnoconfig : PASS, 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 section mismatches
Warnings:
../arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:961:13: warning: 'syscall32_cpu_init' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
arm64-defconfig : PASS, 0 errors, 3 warnings, 0 section mismatches
Warnings:
../ipc/sem.c:377:6: warning: '___p1' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
../ipc/sem.c:377:6: warning: '___p1' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
../include/linux/stddef.h:8:14: warning: 'return' with a value, in function returning void
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Passed with no errors, warnings or mismatches:
The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From ee70bc1e7b63ac8023c9ff9475d8741e397316e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen(a)infineon.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 17:21:32 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] tpm-dev-common: Reject too short writes
tpm_transmit() does not offer an explicit interface to indicate the number
of valid bytes in the communication buffer. Instead, it relies on the
commandSize field in the TPM header that is encoded within the buffer.
Therefore, ensure that a) enough data has been written to the buffer, so
that the commandSize field is present and b) the commandSize field does not
announce more data than has been written to the buffer.
This should have been fixed with CVE-2011-1161 long ago, but apparently
a correct version of that patch never made it into the kernel.
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen(a)infineon.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen(a)linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen(a)linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen(a)linux.intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c
index 610638a80383..461bf0b8a094 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c
@@ -110,6 +110,12 @@ ssize_t tpm_common_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
return -EFAULT;
}
+ if (in_size < 6 ||
+ in_size < be32_to_cpu(*((__be32 *) (priv->data_buffer + 2)))) {
+ mutex_unlock(&priv->buffer_mutex);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
/* atomic tpm command send and result receive. We only hold the ops
* lock during this period so that the tpm can be unregistered even if
* the char dev is held open.
The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 4.14-stable tree.
I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at
Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst.
I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to
<stable(a)vger.kernel.org> and let me know why this patch should be
applied. Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be
seen again.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From 0bbc931a074a741cf8e6279e8045cf7118586780 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king(a)canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 17:45:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] tpm_tis: make array cmd_getticks static const to shrink
object code size
Don't populate array cmd_getticks on the stack, instead make it static
const. Makes the object code smaller by over 160 bytes:
Before:
text data bss dec hex filename
18813 3152 128 22093 564d drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.o
After:
text data bss dec hex filename
18554 3248 128 21930 55aa drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.o
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king(a)canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen(a)linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen(a)linux.intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
index 63bc6c3b949e..1e957e923d21 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ static int probe_itpm(struct tpm_chip *chip)
{
struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
int rc = 0;
- u8 cmd_getticks[] = {
+ static const u8 cmd_getticks[] = {
0x00, 0xc1, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x0a,
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0xf1
};
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 11:58:43AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Lukas Wunner (2017-11-26 11:49:19)
> > Hm, the race at hand would be solved by the intel_fbdev_sync() below,
> > or am I missing something? Still wondering why it's necessary to
> > leave the fbdev around...
>
> The race is solved, but if we do free ifbdev, we can't dereference
> ifbdev prior to the sync; and we store the async cookie inside ifbdev.
> Bleugh. Catch 22.
Right. Oh dear god! We could move the cookie into dev_priv, the
fbdev_suspend_work is also there, outside of struct intel_fbdev.
> What we might do then is just pull the struct into dev_priv under
> ifdef FBDEV.
I vaguely remember something that dev_priv deliberately only contains
a pointer to struct intel_fbdev, that it *was* embedded in dev_priv
in the past but moved out for some reason.
> > However the "if (ifbdev->vma)" looks a bit fishy, ifbdev could be NULL
> > (e.g. if BIOS fb was too small but intelfb_alloc() failed) so I think
> > this might lead to a null pointer deref. Does it make a difference
> > if we check for ifbdev versus ifbdev->vma? I also notice that you
> > added a check for ifbdev->vma with 15727ed0d944 but Daniel later
> > removed it with 88be58be886f.
>
> We know that ifbdev is non-NULL and can't become NULL until fini. So
> after the sync point, we want to ask the question of whether the config
> was successful, for that I used to use ->fb which now replaced by ->vma.
Yes if the fbdev is kept around then obviously it's fine to deref it.
Thanks,
Lukas