The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From aa4113340ae6c2811e046f08c2bc21011d20a072 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor(a)nxp.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 11:19:25 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl_booke: Avoid creating duplicate tlb1 entry
In the current implementation, the call to loadcam_multi() is wrapped
between switch_to_as1() and restore_to_as0() calls so, when it tries
to create its own temporary AS=1 TLB1 entry, it ends up duplicating
the existing one created by switch_to_as1(). Add a check to skip
creating the temporary entry if already running in AS=1.
Fixes: d9e1831a4202 ("powerpc/85xx: Load all early TLB entries at once")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # v4.4+
Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor(a)nxp.com>
Acked-by: Scott Wood <oss(a)buserror.net>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe(a)ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200123111914.2565-1-laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/tlb_low.S b/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/tlb_low.S
index 2ca407cedbe7..eaeee402f96e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/tlb_low.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/tlb_low.S
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ _GLOBAL(set_context)
* extern void loadcam_entry(unsigned int index)
*
* Load TLBCAM[index] entry in to the L2 CAM MMU
- * Must preserve r7, r8, r9, and r10
+ * Must preserve r7, r8, r9, r10 and r11
*/
_GLOBAL(loadcam_entry)
mflr r5
@@ -433,6 +433,10 @@ END_MMU_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(MMU_FTR_BIG_PHYS)
*/
_GLOBAL(loadcam_multi)
mflr r8
+ /* Don't switch to AS=1 if already there */
+ mfmsr r11
+ andi. r11,r11,MSR_IS
+ bne 10f
/*
* Set up temporary TLB entry that is the same as what we're
@@ -458,6 +462,7 @@ _GLOBAL(loadcam_multi)
mtmsr r6
isync
+10:
mr r9,r3
add r10,r3,r4
2: bl loadcam_entry
@@ -466,6 +471,10 @@ _GLOBAL(loadcam_multi)
mr r3,r9
blt 2b
+ /* Don't return to AS=0 if we were in AS=1 at function start */
+ andi. r11,r11,MSR_IS
+ bne 3f
+
/* Return to AS=0 and clear the temporary entry */
mfmsr r6
rlwinm. r6,r6,0,~(MSR_IS|MSR_DS)
@@ -481,6 +490,7 @@ _GLOBAL(loadcam_multi)
tlbwe
isync
+3:
mtlr r8
blr
#endif
The aarch32_vdso_pages[] array never has entries allocated in the C_VVAR
or C_VDSO slots, and as the array is zero initialized these contain
NULL.
However in __aarch32_alloc_vdso_pages() when
aarch32_alloc_kuser_vdso_page() fails we attempt to free the page whose
struct page is at NULL, which is obviously nonsensical.
This patch removes the erroneous page freeing.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland(a)arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas(a)arm.com>
Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino(a)arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will(a)kernel.org>
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
---
arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c | 13 +------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c
index 354b11e27c07..033a48f30dbb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c
@@ -260,18 +260,7 @@ static int __aarch32_alloc_vdso_pages(void)
if (ret)
return ret;
- ret = aarch32_alloc_kuser_vdso_page();
- if (ret) {
- unsigned long c_vvar =
- (unsigned long)page_to_virt(aarch32_vdso_pages[C_VVAR]);
- unsigned long c_vdso =
- (unsigned long)page_to_virt(aarch32_vdso_pages[C_VDSO]);
-
- free_page(c_vvar);
- free_page(c_vdso);
- }
-
- return ret;
+ return aarch32_alloc_kuser_vdso_page();
}
#else
static int __aarch32_alloc_vdso_pages(void)
--
2.11.0
From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea(a)microchip.com>
[ Upstream commit b0ecf1c6c6e82da4847900fad0272abfd014666d ]
clk_hw_round_rate() may call round rate function of its parents. In case
of SAM9X60 two of USB parrents are PLLA and UPLL. These clocks are
controlled by clk-sam9x60-pll.c driver. The round rate function for this
driver is sam9x60_pll_round_rate() which call in turn
sam9x60_pll_get_best_div_mul(). In case the requested rate is not in the
proper range (rate < characteristics->output[0].min &&
rate > characteristics->output[0].max) the sam9x60_pll_round_rate() will
return a negative number to its caller (called by
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()). clk_hw_round_rate() will return zero in
case a negative number is returned by clk_core_round_rate_nolock(). With
this, the USB clock will continue its rate computation even caller of
clk_hw_round_rate() returned an error. With this, the USB clock on SAM9X60
may not chose the best parent. I detected this after a suspend/resume
cycle on SAM9X60.
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea(a)microchip.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1579261009-4573-2-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@m…
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd(a)kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c
index 8ab8502778a28..55e09641b491b 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c
@@ -79,6 +79,9 @@ static int at91sam9x5_clk_usb_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
tmp_parent_rate = req->rate * div;
tmp_parent_rate = clk_hw_round_rate(parent,
tmp_parent_rate);
+ if (!tmp_parent_rate)
+ continue;
+
tmp_rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(tmp_parent_rate, div);
if (tmp_rate < req->rate)
tmp_diff = req->rate - tmp_rate;
--
2.20.1
From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea(a)microchip.com>
[ Upstream commit b0ecf1c6c6e82da4847900fad0272abfd014666d ]
clk_hw_round_rate() may call round rate function of its parents. In case
of SAM9X60 two of USB parrents are PLLA and UPLL. These clocks are
controlled by clk-sam9x60-pll.c driver. The round rate function for this
driver is sam9x60_pll_round_rate() which call in turn
sam9x60_pll_get_best_div_mul(). In case the requested rate is not in the
proper range (rate < characteristics->output[0].min &&
rate > characteristics->output[0].max) the sam9x60_pll_round_rate() will
return a negative number to its caller (called by
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()). clk_hw_round_rate() will return zero in
case a negative number is returned by clk_core_round_rate_nolock(). With
this, the USB clock will continue its rate computation even caller of
clk_hw_round_rate() returned an error. With this, the USB clock on SAM9X60
may not chose the best parent. I detected this after a suspend/resume
cycle on SAM9X60.
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea(a)microchip.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1579261009-4573-2-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@m…
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd(a)kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c
index 791770a563fcc..6fac6383d024e 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c
@@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ static int at91sam9x5_clk_usb_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
tmp_parent_rate = req->rate * div;
tmp_parent_rate = clk_hw_round_rate(parent,
tmp_parent_rate);
+ if (!tmp_parent_rate)
+ continue;
+
tmp_rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(tmp_parent_rate, div);
if (tmp_rate < req->rate)
tmp_diff = req->rate - tmp_rate;
--
2.20.1
From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea(a)microchip.com>
[ Upstream commit b0ecf1c6c6e82da4847900fad0272abfd014666d ]
clk_hw_round_rate() may call round rate function of its parents. In case
of SAM9X60 two of USB parrents are PLLA and UPLL. These clocks are
controlled by clk-sam9x60-pll.c driver. The round rate function for this
driver is sam9x60_pll_round_rate() which call in turn
sam9x60_pll_get_best_div_mul(). In case the requested rate is not in the
proper range (rate < characteristics->output[0].min &&
rate > characteristics->output[0].max) the sam9x60_pll_round_rate() will
return a negative number to its caller (called by
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()). clk_hw_round_rate() will return zero in
case a negative number is returned by clk_core_round_rate_nolock(). With
this, the USB clock will continue its rate computation even caller of
clk_hw_round_rate() returned an error. With this, the USB clock on SAM9X60
may not chose the best parent. I detected this after a suspend/resume
cycle on SAM9X60.
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea(a)microchip.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1579261009-4573-2-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@m…
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd(a)kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c
index 791770a563fcc..6fac6383d024e 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c
@@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ static int at91sam9x5_clk_usb_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
tmp_parent_rate = req->rate * div;
tmp_parent_rate = clk_hw_round_rate(parent,
tmp_parent_rate);
+ if (!tmp_parent_rate)
+ continue;
+
tmp_rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(tmp_parent_rate, div);
if (tmp_rate < req->rate)
tmp_diff = req->rate - tmp_rate;
--
2.20.1