- Linux-stable-mirror - lists.linaro.org

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] USB: serial: io_edgeport: handle unbound ports on URB" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From e37d1aeda737a20b1846a91a3da3f8b0f00cf690 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johan Hovold <johan(a)kernel.org> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:50:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] USB: serial: io_edgeport: handle unbound ports on URB completion Check for NULL port data in the shared interrupt and bulk completion callbacks to avoid dereferencing a NULL pointer in case a device sends data for a port device which isn't bound to a driver (e.g. due to a malicious device having unexpected endpoints or after an allocation failure on port probe). Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Cc: stable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan(a)kernel.org> diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c b/drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c index 9690a5f4b9d6..0582d78bdb1d 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c @@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ static void edge_interrupt_callback(struct urb *urb) if (txCredits) { port = edge_serial->serial->port[portNumber]; edge_port = usb_get_serial_port_data(port); - if (edge_port->open) { + if (edge_port && edge_port->open) { spin_lock_irqsave(&edge_port->ep_lock, flags); edge_port->txCredits += txCredits; @@ -1825,7 +1825,7 @@ static void process_rcvd_data(struct edgeport_serial *edge_serial, port = edge_serial->serial->port[ edge_serial->rxPort]; edge_port = usb_get_serial_port_data(port); - if (edge_port->open) { + if (edge_port && edge_port->open) { dev_dbg(dev, "%s - Sending %d bytes to TTY for port %d\n", __func__, rxLen, edge_serial->rxPort);

5 years, 11 months

3
2
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: check rw_devices, not num_devices for balance" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From b35cf1f0bf1f2b0b193093338414b9bd63b29015 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:11:24 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: check rw_devices, not num_devices for balance The fstest btrfs/154 reports [ 8675.381709] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28) [ 8675.383302] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 31900 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:2038 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x1e0/0x1f0 [btrfs] [ 8675.390925] CPU: 1 PID: 31900 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.5.0-rc6-default+ #935 [ 8675.392780] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 [ 8675.395452] RIP: 0010:btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x1e0/0x1f0 [btrfs] [ 8675.402672] RSP: 0018:ffffb2090888fb00 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 8675.404413] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff92026dfa91c8 RCX: 0000000000000001 [ 8675.406609] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff8e100899 RDI: ffffffff8e100971 [ 8675.408775] RBP: ffff920247c61660 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 8675.410978] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00000000ffffffe4 [ 8675.412647] R13: ffff92026db74000 R14: ffff920247c616b8 R15: ffff92026dfbc000 [ 8675.413994] FS: 00007fd5e57248c0(0000) GS:ffff92027d800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 8675.416146] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 8675.417833] CR2: 0000564aa51682d8 CR3: 000000006dcbc004 CR4: 0000000000160ee0 [ 8675.419801] Call Trace: [ 8675.420742] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x355/0x480 [btrfs] [ 8675.422600] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xc8/0xaf0 [btrfs] [ 8675.424335] reset_balance_state+0x14a/0x190 [btrfs] [ 8675.425824] btrfs_balance.cold+0xe7/0x154 [btrfs] [ 8675.427313] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x235/0x2c0 [ 8675.428663] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x298/0x350 [btrfs] [ 8675.430285] btrfs_ioctl+0x466/0x2550 [btrfs] [ 8675.431788] ? mem_cgroup_charge_statistics+0x51/0xf0 [ 8675.433487] ? mem_cgroup_commit_charge+0x56/0x400 [ 8675.435122] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xc0 [ 8675.436618] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30 [ 8675.438093] ? __handle_mm_fault+0x499/0x740 [ 8675.439619] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x56e/0x770 [ 8675.441034] do_vfs_ioctl+0x56e/0x770 [ 8675.442411] ksys_ioctl+0x3a/0x70 [ 8675.443718] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c [ 8675.445333] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [ 8675.446705] do_syscall_64+0x50/0x210 [ 8675.448059] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 8675.479187] BTRFS: error (device vdb) in btrfs_create_pending_block_groups:2038: errno=-28 No space left We now use btrfs_can_overcommit() to see if we can flip a block group read only. Before this would fail because we weren't taking into account the usable un-allocated space for allocating chunks. With my patches we were allowed to do the balance, which is technically correct. The test is trying to start balance on degraded mount. So now we're trying to allocate a chunk and cannot because we want to allocate a RAID1 chunk, but there's only 1 device that's available for usage. This results in an ENOSPC. But we shouldn't even be making it this far, we don't have enough devices to restripe. The problem is we're using btrfs_num_devices(), that also includes missing devices. That's not actually what we want, we need to use rw_devices. The chunk_mutex is not needed here, rw_devices changes only in device add, remove or replace, all are excluded by EXCL_OP mechanism. Fixes: e4d8ec0f65b9 ("Btrfs: implement online profile changing") CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> [ add stacktrace, update changelog, drop chunk_mutex ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index a6d3f08bfff3..9b78e720c697 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -3881,7 +3881,11 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, } } - num_devices = btrfs_num_devices(fs_info); + /* + * rw_devices will not change at the moment, device add/delete/replace + * are excluded by EXCL_OP + */ + num_devices = fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices; /* * SINGLE profile on-disk has no profile bit, but in-memory we have a

5 years, 11 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: check rw_devices, not num_devices for balance" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From b35cf1f0bf1f2b0b193093338414b9bd63b29015 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:11:24 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: check rw_devices, not num_devices for balance The fstest btrfs/154 reports [ 8675.381709] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28) [ 8675.383302] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 31900 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:2038 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x1e0/0x1f0 [btrfs] [ 8675.390925] CPU: 1 PID: 31900 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.5.0-rc6-default+ #935 [ 8675.392780] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 [ 8675.395452] RIP: 0010:btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x1e0/0x1f0 [btrfs] [ 8675.402672] RSP: 0018:ffffb2090888fb00 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 8675.404413] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff92026dfa91c8 RCX: 0000000000000001 [ 8675.406609] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff8e100899 RDI: ffffffff8e100971 [ 8675.408775] RBP: ffff920247c61660 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 8675.410978] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00000000ffffffe4 [ 8675.412647] R13: ffff92026db74000 R14: ffff920247c616b8 R15: ffff92026dfbc000 [ 8675.413994] FS: 00007fd5e57248c0(0000) GS:ffff92027d800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 8675.416146] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 8675.417833] CR2: 0000564aa51682d8 CR3: 000000006dcbc004 CR4: 0000000000160ee0 [ 8675.419801] Call Trace: [ 8675.420742] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x355/0x480 [btrfs] [ 8675.422600] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xc8/0xaf0 [btrfs] [ 8675.424335] reset_balance_state+0x14a/0x190 [btrfs] [ 8675.425824] btrfs_balance.cold+0xe7/0x154 [btrfs] [ 8675.427313] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x235/0x2c0 [ 8675.428663] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x298/0x350 [btrfs] [ 8675.430285] btrfs_ioctl+0x466/0x2550 [btrfs] [ 8675.431788] ? mem_cgroup_charge_statistics+0x51/0xf0 [ 8675.433487] ? mem_cgroup_commit_charge+0x56/0x400 [ 8675.435122] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xc0 [ 8675.436618] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30 [ 8675.438093] ? __handle_mm_fault+0x499/0x740 [ 8675.439619] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x56e/0x770 [ 8675.441034] do_vfs_ioctl+0x56e/0x770 [ 8675.442411] ksys_ioctl+0x3a/0x70 [ 8675.443718] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c [ 8675.445333] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [ 8675.446705] do_syscall_64+0x50/0x210 [ 8675.448059] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 8675.479187] BTRFS: error (device vdb) in btrfs_create_pending_block_groups:2038: errno=-28 No space left We now use btrfs_can_overcommit() to see if we can flip a block group read only. Before this would fail because we weren't taking into account the usable un-allocated space for allocating chunks. With my patches we were allowed to do the balance, which is technically correct. The test is trying to start balance on degraded mount. So now we're trying to allocate a chunk and cannot because we want to allocate a RAID1 chunk, but there's only 1 device that's available for usage. This results in an ENOSPC. But we shouldn't even be making it this far, we don't have enough devices to restripe. The problem is we're using btrfs_num_devices(), that also includes missing devices. That's not actually what we want, we need to use rw_devices. The chunk_mutex is not needed here, rw_devices changes only in device add, remove or replace, all are excluded by EXCL_OP mechanism. Fixes: e4d8ec0f65b9 ("Btrfs: implement online profile changing") CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> [ add stacktrace, update changelog, drop chunk_mutex ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index a6d3f08bfff3..9b78e720c697 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -3881,7 +3881,11 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, } } - num_devices = btrfs_num_devices(fs_info); + /* + * rw_devices will not change at the moment, device add/delete/replace + * are excluded by EXCL_OP + */ + num_devices = fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices; /* * SINGLE profile on-disk has no profile bit, but in-memory we have a

5 years, 11 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: check rw_devices, not num_devices for balance" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From b35cf1f0bf1f2b0b193093338414b9bd63b29015 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:11:24 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: check rw_devices, not num_devices for balance The fstest btrfs/154 reports [ 8675.381709] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28) [ 8675.383302] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 31900 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:2038 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x1e0/0x1f0 [btrfs] [ 8675.390925] CPU: 1 PID: 31900 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.5.0-rc6-default+ #935 [ 8675.392780] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 [ 8675.395452] RIP: 0010:btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x1e0/0x1f0 [btrfs] [ 8675.402672] RSP: 0018:ffffb2090888fb00 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 8675.404413] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff92026dfa91c8 RCX: 0000000000000001 [ 8675.406609] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff8e100899 RDI: ffffffff8e100971 [ 8675.408775] RBP: ffff920247c61660 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 8675.410978] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00000000ffffffe4 [ 8675.412647] R13: ffff92026db74000 R14: ffff920247c616b8 R15: ffff92026dfbc000 [ 8675.413994] FS: 00007fd5e57248c0(0000) GS:ffff92027d800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 8675.416146] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 8675.417833] CR2: 0000564aa51682d8 CR3: 000000006dcbc004 CR4: 0000000000160ee0 [ 8675.419801] Call Trace: [ 8675.420742] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x355/0x480 [btrfs] [ 8675.422600] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xc8/0xaf0 [btrfs] [ 8675.424335] reset_balance_state+0x14a/0x190 [btrfs] [ 8675.425824] btrfs_balance.cold+0xe7/0x154 [btrfs] [ 8675.427313] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x235/0x2c0 [ 8675.428663] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x298/0x350 [btrfs] [ 8675.430285] btrfs_ioctl+0x466/0x2550 [btrfs] [ 8675.431788] ? mem_cgroup_charge_statistics+0x51/0xf0 [ 8675.433487] ? mem_cgroup_commit_charge+0x56/0x400 [ 8675.435122] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xc0 [ 8675.436618] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30 [ 8675.438093] ? __handle_mm_fault+0x499/0x740 [ 8675.439619] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x56e/0x770 [ 8675.441034] do_vfs_ioctl+0x56e/0x770 [ 8675.442411] ksys_ioctl+0x3a/0x70 [ 8675.443718] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c [ 8675.445333] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [ 8675.446705] do_syscall_64+0x50/0x210 [ 8675.448059] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 8675.479187] BTRFS: error (device vdb) in btrfs_create_pending_block_groups:2038: errno=-28 No space left We now use btrfs_can_overcommit() to see if we can flip a block group read only. Before this would fail because we weren't taking into account the usable un-allocated space for allocating chunks. With my patches we were allowed to do the balance, which is technically correct. The test is trying to start balance on degraded mount. So now we're trying to allocate a chunk and cannot because we want to allocate a RAID1 chunk, but there's only 1 device that's available for usage. This results in an ENOSPC. But we shouldn't even be making it this far, we don't have enough devices to restripe. The problem is we're using btrfs_num_devices(), that also includes missing devices. That's not actually what we want, we need to use rw_devices. The chunk_mutex is not needed here, rw_devices changes only in device add, remove or replace, all are excluded by EXCL_OP mechanism. Fixes: e4d8ec0f65b9 ("Btrfs: implement online profile changing") CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> [ add stacktrace, update changelog, drop chunk_mutex ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index a6d3f08bfff3..9b78e720c697 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -3881,7 +3881,11 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, } } - num_devices = btrfs_num_devices(fs_info); + /* + * rw_devices will not change at the moment, device add/delete/replace + * are excluded by EXCL_OP + */ + num_devices = fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices; /* * SINGLE profile on-disk has no profile bit, but in-memory we have a

5 years, 11 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: check rw_devices, not num_devices for balance" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From b35cf1f0bf1f2b0b193093338414b9bd63b29015 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:11:24 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: check rw_devices, not num_devices for balance The fstest btrfs/154 reports [ 8675.381709] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28) [ 8675.383302] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 31900 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:2038 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x1e0/0x1f0 [btrfs] [ 8675.390925] CPU: 1 PID: 31900 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.5.0-rc6-default+ #935 [ 8675.392780] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 [ 8675.395452] RIP: 0010:btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x1e0/0x1f0 [btrfs] [ 8675.402672] RSP: 0018:ffffb2090888fb00 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 8675.404413] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff92026dfa91c8 RCX: 0000000000000001 [ 8675.406609] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff8e100899 RDI: ffffffff8e100971 [ 8675.408775] RBP: ffff920247c61660 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 8675.410978] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00000000ffffffe4 [ 8675.412647] R13: ffff92026db74000 R14: ffff920247c616b8 R15: ffff92026dfbc000 [ 8675.413994] FS: 00007fd5e57248c0(0000) GS:ffff92027d800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 8675.416146] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 8675.417833] CR2: 0000564aa51682d8 CR3: 000000006dcbc004 CR4: 0000000000160ee0 [ 8675.419801] Call Trace: [ 8675.420742] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x355/0x480 [btrfs] [ 8675.422600] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xc8/0xaf0 [btrfs] [ 8675.424335] reset_balance_state+0x14a/0x190 [btrfs] [ 8675.425824] btrfs_balance.cold+0xe7/0x154 [btrfs] [ 8675.427313] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x235/0x2c0 [ 8675.428663] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x298/0x350 [btrfs] [ 8675.430285] btrfs_ioctl+0x466/0x2550 [btrfs] [ 8675.431788] ? mem_cgroup_charge_statistics+0x51/0xf0 [ 8675.433487] ? mem_cgroup_commit_charge+0x56/0x400 [ 8675.435122] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xc0 [ 8675.436618] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30 [ 8675.438093] ? __handle_mm_fault+0x499/0x740 [ 8675.439619] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x56e/0x770 [ 8675.441034] do_vfs_ioctl+0x56e/0x770 [ 8675.442411] ksys_ioctl+0x3a/0x70 [ 8675.443718] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c [ 8675.445333] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [ 8675.446705] do_syscall_64+0x50/0x210 [ 8675.448059] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 8675.479187] BTRFS: error (device vdb) in btrfs_create_pending_block_groups:2038: errno=-28 No space left We now use btrfs_can_overcommit() to see if we can flip a block group read only. Before this would fail because we weren't taking into account the usable un-allocated space for allocating chunks. With my patches we were allowed to do the balance, which is technically correct. The test is trying to start balance on degraded mount. So now we're trying to allocate a chunk and cannot because we want to allocate a RAID1 chunk, but there's only 1 device that's available for usage. This results in an ENOSPC. But we shouldn't even be making it this far, we don't have enough devices to restripe. The problem is we're using btrfs_num_devices(), that also includes missing devices. That's not actually what we want, we need to use rw_devices. The chunk_mutex is not needed here, rw_devices changes only in device add, remove or replace, all are excluded by EXCL_OP mechanism. Fixes: e4d8ec0f65b9 ("Btrfs: implement online profile changing") CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> [ add stacktrace, update changelog, drop chunk_mutex ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index a6d3f08bfff3..9b78e720c697 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -3881,7 +3881,11 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, } } - num_devices = btrfs_num_devices(fs_info); + /* + * rw_devices will not change at the moment, device add/delete/replace + * are excluded by EXCL_OP + */ + num_devices = fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices; /* * SINGLE profile on-disk has no profile bit, but in-memory we have a

5 years, 11 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: do not delete mismatched root refs" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 423a716cd7be16fb08690760691befe3be97d3fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 17:20:29 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: do not delete mismatched root refs btrfs_del_root_ref() will simply WARN_ON() if the ref doesn't match in any way, and then continue to delete the reference. This shouldn't happen, we have these values because there's more to the reference than the original root and the sub root. If any of these checks fail, return -ENOENT. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c index 3b17b647d002..612411c74550 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c @@ -376,11 +376,13 @@ int btrfs_del_root_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, u64 root_id, leaf = path->nodes[0]; ref = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, path->slots[0], struct btrfs_root_ref); - - WARN_ON(btrfs_root_ref_dirid(leaf, ref) != dirid); - WARN_ON(btrfs_root_ref_name_len(leaf, ref) != name_len); ptr = (unsigned long)(ref + 1); - WARN_ON(memcmp_extent_buffer(leaf, name, ptr, name_len)); + if ((btrfs_root_ref_dirid(leaf, ref) != dirid) || + (btrfs_root_ref_name_len(leaf, ref) != name_len) || + memcmp_extent_buffer(leaf, name, ptr, name_len)) { + err = -ENOENT; + goto out; + } *sequence = btrfs_root_ref_sequence(leaf, ref); ret = btrfs_del_item(trans, tree_root, path);

5 years, 11 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: do not delete mismatched root refs" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 423a716cd7be16fb08690760691befe3be97d3fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 17:20:29 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: do not delete mismatched root refs btrfs_del_root_ref() will simply WARN_ON() if the ref doesn't match in any way, and then continue to delete the reference. This shouldn't happen, we have these values because there's more to the reference than the original root and the sub root. If any of these checks fail, return -ENOENT. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c index 3b17b647d002..612411c74550 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c @@ -376,11 +376,13 @@ int btrfs_del_root_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, u64 root_id, leaf = path->nodes[0]; ref = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, path->slots[0], struct btrfs_root_ref); - - WARN_ON(btrfs_root_ref_dirid(leaf, ref) != dirid); - WARN_ON(btrfs_root_ref_name_len(leaf, ref) != name_len); ptr = (unsigned long)(ref + 1); - WARN_ON(memcmp_extent_buffer(leaf, name, ptr, name_len)); + if ((btrfs_root_ref_dirid(leaf, ref) != dirid) || + (btrfs_root_ref_name_len(leaf, ref) != name_len) || + memcmp_extent_buffer(leaf, name, ptr, name_len)) { + err = -ENOENT; + goto out; + } *sequence = btrfs_root_ref_sequence(leaf, ref); ret = btrfs_del_item(trans, tree_root, path);

5 years, 11 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: do not delete mismatched root refs" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 423a716cd7be16fb08690760691befe3be97d3fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 17:20:29 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: do not delete mismatched root refs btrfs_del_root_ref() will simply WARN_ON() if the ref doesn't match in any way, and then continue to delete the reference. This shouldn't happen, we have these values because there's more to the reference than the original root and the sub root. If any of these checks fail, return -ENOENT. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c index 3b17b647d002..612411c74550 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c @@ -376,11 +376,13 @@ int btrfs_del_root_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, u64 root_id, leaf = path->nodes[0]; ref = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, path->slots[0], struct btrfs_root_ref); - - WARN_ON(btrfs_root_ref_dirid(leaf, ref) != dirid); - WARN_ON(btrfs_root_ref_name_len(leaf, ref) != name_len); ptr = (unsigned long)(ref + 1); - WARN_ON(memcmp_extent_buffer(leaf, name, ptr, name_len)); + if ((btrfs_root_ref_dirid(leaf, ref) != dirid) || + (btrfs_root_ref_name_len(leaf, ref) != name_len) || + memcmp_extent_buffer(leaf, name, ptr, name_len)) { + err = -ENOENT; + goto out; + } *sequence = btrfs_root_ref_sequence(leaf, ref); ret = btrfs_del_item(trans, tree_root, path);

5 years, 11 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix invalid removal of root ref" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From d49d3287e74ffe55ae7430d1e795e5f9bf7359ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 17:20:28 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix invalid removal of root ref If we have the following sequence of events btrfs sub create A btrfs sub create A/B btrfs sub snap A C mkdir C/foo mv A/B C/foo rm -rf * We will end up with a transaction abort. The reason for this is because we create a root ref for B pointing to A. When we create a snapshot of C we still have B in our tree, but because the root ref points to A and not C we will make it appear to be empty. The problem happens when we move B into C. This removes the root ref for B pointing to A and adds a ref of B pointing to C. When we rmdir C we'll see that we have a ref to our root and remove the root ref, despite not actually matching our reference name. Now btrfs_del_root_ref() allowing this to work is a bug as well, however we know that this inode does not actually point to a root ref in the first place, so we shouldn't be calling btrfs_del_root_ref() in the first place and instead simply look up our dir index for this item and do the rest of the removal. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 99631030d13c..c70baafb2a39 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -4283,13 +4283,16 @@ static int btrfs_unlink_subvol(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, } btrfs_release_path(path); - ret = btrfs_del_root_ref(trans, objectid, root->root_key.objectid, - dir_ino, &index, name, name_len); - if (ret < 0) { - if (ret != -ENOENT) { - btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret); - goto out; - } + /* + * This is a placeholder inode for a subvolume we didn't have a + * reference to at the time of the snapshot creation. In the meantime + * we could have renamed the real subvol link into our snapshot, so + * depending on btrfs_del_root_ref to return -ENOENT here is incorret. + * Instead simply lookup the dir_index_item for this entry so we can + * remove it. Otherwise we know we have a ref to the root and we can + * call btrfs_del_root_ref, and it _shouldn't_ fail. + */ + if (btrfs_ino(inode) == BTRFS_EMPTY_SUBVOL_DIR_OBJECTID) { di = btrfs_search_dir_index_item(root, path, dir_ino, name, name_len); if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(di)) { @@ -4304,8 +4307,16 @@ static int btrfs_unlink_subvol(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, leaf = path->nodes[0]; btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &key, path->slots[0]); index = key.offset; + btrfs_release_path(path); + } else { + ret = btrfs_del_root_ref(trans, objectid, + root->root_key.objectid, dir_ino, + &index, name, name_len); + if (ret) { + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret); + goto out; + } } - btrfs_release_path(path); ret = btrfs_delete_delayed_dir_index(trans, BTRFS_I(dir), index); if (ret) {

5 years, 11 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix invalid removal of root ref" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From d49d3287e74ffe55ae7430d1e795e5f9bf7359ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 17:20:28 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix invalid removal of root ref If we have the following sequence of events btrfs sub create A btrfs sub create A/B btrfs sub snap A C mkdir C/foo mv A/B C/foo rm -rf * We will end up with a transaction abort. The reason for this is because we create a root ref for B pointing to A. When we create a snapshot of C we still have B in our tree, but because the root ref points to A and not C we will make it appear to be empty. The problem happens when we move B into C. This removes the root ref for B pointing to A and adds a ref of B pointing to C. When we rmdir C we'll see that we have a ref to our root and remove the root ref, despite not actually matching our reference name. Now btrfs_del_root_ref() allowing this to work is a bug as well, however we know that this inode does not actually point to a root ref in the first place, so we shouldn't be calling btrfs_del_root_ref() in the first place and instead simply look up our dir index for this item and do the rest of the removal. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 99631030d13c..c70baafb2a39 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -4283,13 +4283,16 @@ static int btrfs_unlink_subvol(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, } btrfs_release_path(path); - ret = btrfs_del_root_ref(trans, objectid, root->root_key.objectid, - dir_ino, &index, name, name_len); - if (ret < 0) { - if (ret != -ENOENT) { - btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret); - goto out; - } + /* + * This is a placeholder inode for a subvolume we didn't have a + * reference to at the time of the snapshot creation. In the meantime + * we could have renamed the real subvol link into our snapshot, so + * depending on btrfs_del_root_ref to return -ENOENT here is incorret. + * Instead simply lookup the dir_index_item for this entry so we can + * remove it. Otherwise we know we have a ref to the root and we can + * call btrfs_del_root_ref, and it _shouldn't_ fail. + */ + if (btrfs_ino(inode) == BTRFS_EMPTY_SUBVOL_DIR_OBJECTID) { di = btrfs_search_dir_index_item(root, path, dir_ino, name, name_len); if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(di)) { @@ -4304,8 +4307,16 @@ static int btrfs_unlink_subvol(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, leaf = path->nodes[0]; btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &key, path->slots[0]); index = key.offset; + btrfs_release_path(path); + } else { + ret = btrfs_del_root_ref(trans, objectid, + root->root_key.objectid, dir_ino, + &index, name, name_len); + if (ret) { + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret); + goto out; + } } - btrfs_release_path(path); ret = btrfs_delete_delayed_dir_index(trans, BTRFS_I(dir), index); if (ret) {

5 years, 11 months

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror