From: Oliver Hartkopp socketcan@hartkopp.net
commit 0acc442309a0a1b01bcdaa135e56e6398a49439c upstream.
Analogue to commit 8aa59e355949 ("can: af_can: fix NULL pointer dereference in can_rx_register()") we need to check for a missing initialization of ml_priv in the receive path of CAN frames.
Since commit 4e096a18867a ("net: introduce CAN specific pointer in the struct net_device") the check for dev->type to be ARPHRD_CAN is not sufficient anymore since bonding or tun netdevices claim to be CAN devices but do not initialize ml_priv accordingly.
Fixes: 4e096a18867a ("net: introduce CAN specific pointer in the struct net_device") Reported-by: syzbot+2d7f58292cb5b29eb5ad@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: Wei Chen harperchen1110@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp socketcan@hartkopp.net Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221206201259.3028-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde mkl@pengutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- net/can/af_can.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/can/af_can.c +++ b/net/can/af_can.c @@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ static int can_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, { struct canfd_frame *cfd = (struct canfd_frame *)skb->data;
- if (unlikely(dev->type != ARPHRD_CAN || skb->len != CAN_MTU)) { + if (unlikely(dev->type != ARPHRD_CAN || !can_get_ml_priv(dev) || skb->len != CAN_MTU)) { pr_warn_once("PF_CAN: dropped non conform CAN skbuff: dev type %d, len %d\n", dev->type, skb->len); goto free_skb; @@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ static int canfd_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb { struct canfd_frame *cfd = (struct canfd_frame *)skb->data;
- if (unlikely(dev->type != ARPHRD_CAN || skb->len != CANFD_MTU)) { + if (unlikely(dev->type != ARPHRD_CAN || !can_get_ml_priv(dev) || skb->len != CANFD_MTU)) { pr_warn_once("PF_CAN: dropped non conform CAN FD skbuff: dev type %d, len %d\n", dev->type, skb->len); goto free_skb;