4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Christophe JAILLET christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr
[ Upstream commit 68fa24f9121c04ef146b5158f538c8b32f285be5 ]
We should not call edac_mc_del_mc() if a corresponding call to edac_mc_add_mc() has not been performed yet.
So here, we should go to err instead of err2 to branch at the right place of the error handling path.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr Cc: linux-edac linux-edac@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180107205400.14068-1-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.f... Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov bp@suse.de Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c +++ b/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c @@ -759,7 +759,7 @@ static int mv64x60_mc_err_probe(struct p /* Non-ECC RAM? */ printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: No ECC DIMMs discovered\n", __func__); res = -ENODEV; - goto err2; + goto err; }
edac_dbg(3, "init mci\n");