From: Ryusuke Konishi konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com
commit 6be49d100c22ffea3287a4b19d7639d259888e33 upstream.
The finalization of nilfs_segctor_thread() can race with nilfs_segctor_kill_thread() which terminates that thread, potentially causing a use-after-free BUG as KASAN detected.
At the end of nilfs_segctor_thread(), it assigns NULL to "sc_task" member of "struct nilfs_sc_info" to indicate the thread has finished, and then notifies nilfs_segctor_kill_thread() of this using waitqueue "sc_wait_task" on the struct nilfs_sc_info.
However, here, immediately after the NULL assignment to "sc_task", it is possible that nilfs_segctor_kill_thread() will detect it and return to continue the deallocation, freeing the nilfs_sc_info structure before the thread does the notification.
This fixes the issue by protecting the NULL assignment to "sc_task" and its notification, with spinlock "sc_state_lock" of the struct nilfs_sc_info. Since nilfs_segctor_kill_thread() does a final check to see if "sc_task" is NULL with "sc_state_lock" locked, this can eliminate the race.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230327175318.8060-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+b08ebcc22f8f3e6be43a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/00000000000000660d05f7dfa877@google.com Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/nilfs2/segment.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c @@ -2609,11 +2609,10 @@ static int nilfs_segctor_thread(void *ar goto loop;
end_thread: - spin_unlock(&sci->sc_state_lock); - /* end sync. */ sci->sc_task = NULL; wake_up(&sci->sc_wait_task); /* for nilfs_segctor_kill_thread() */ + spin_unlock(&sci->sc_state_lock); return 0; }