6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Yevgeny Kliteynik kliteyn@nvidia.com
[ Upstream commit 5b2a2523eeea5f03d39a9d1ff1bad2e9f8eb98d2 ]
Go-To-Vport action on RX is not allowed when the vport is uplink. In such case, the packet should be dropped.
Fixes: 9db810ed2d37 ("net/mlx5: DR, Expose steering action functionality") Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik kliteyn@nvidia.com Reviewed-by: Erez Shitrit erezsh@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed saeedm@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- .../mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_action.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_action.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_action.c index 1a5aee8a7f13..90c38cbbde18 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_action.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_action.c @@ -867,11 +867,17 @@ int mlx5dr_actions_build_ste_arr(struct mlx5dr_matcher *matcher, action->sampler->tx_icm_addr; break; case DR_ACTION_TYP_VPORT: - attr.hit_gvmi = action->vport->caps->vhca_gvmi; - dest_action = action; - attr.final_icm_addr = rx_rule ? - action->vport->caps->icm_address_rx : - action->vport->caps->icm_address_tx; + if (unlikely(rx_rule && action->vport->caps->num == MLX5_VPORT_UPLINK)) { + /* can't go to uplink on RX rule - dropping instead */ + attr.final_icm_addr = nic_dmn->drop_icm_addr; + attr.hit_gvmi = nic_dmn->drop_icm_addr >> 48; + } else { + attr.hit_gvmi = action->vport->caps->vhca_gvmi; + dest_action = action; + attr.final_icm_addr = rx_rule ? + action->vport->caps->icm_address_rx : + action->vport->caps->icm_address_tx; + } break; case DR_ACTION_TYP_POP_VLAN: if (!rx_rule && !(dmn->ste_ctx->actions_caps &