From: Hao Li lihao2018.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
[ Upstream commit 88149082bb8ef31b289673669e080ec6a00c2e59 ]
If generic_drop_inode() returns true, it means iput_final() can evict this inode regardless of whether it is dirty or not. If we check I_DONTCACHE in generic_drop_inode(), any inode with this bit set will be evicted unconditionally. This is not the desired behavior because I_DONTCACHE only means the inode shouldn't be cached on the LRU list. As for whether we need to evict this inode, this is what generic_drop_inode() should do. This patch corrects the usage of I_DONTCACHE.
This patch was proposed in [1].
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20200831003407.GE12096@dread.disaster....
Fixes: dae2f8ed7992 ("fs: Lift XFS_IDONTCACHE to the VFS layer") Signed-off-by: Hao Li lihao2018.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner dchinner@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny ira.weiny@intel.com Signed-off-by: Al Viro viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- fs/inode.c | 4 +++- include/linux/fs.h | 3 +-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c index 9d78c37b00b81..5eea9912a0b9d 100644 --- a/fs/inode.c +++ b/fs/inode.c @@ -1627,7 +1627,9 @@ static void iput_final(struct inode *inode) else drop = generic_drop_inode(inode);
- if (!drop && (sb->s_flags & SB_ACTIVE)) { + if (!drop && + !(inode->i_state & I_DONTCACHE) && + (sb->s_flags & SB_ACTIVE)) { inode_add_lru(inode); spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); return; diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h index 8667d0cdc71e7..8bde32cf97115 100644 --- a/include/linux/fs.h +++ b/include/linux/fs.h @@ -2878,8 +2878,7 @@ extern int inode_needs_sync(struct inode *inode); extern int generic_delete_inode(struct inode *inode); static inline int generic_drop_inode(struct inode *inode) { - return !inode->i_nlink || inode_unhashed(inode) || - (inode->i_state & I_DONTCACHE); + return !inode->i_nlink || inode_unhashed(inode); } extern void d_mark_dontcache(struct inode *inode);