From: Jan Kara jack@suse.cz
[ Upstream commit c5ac56bb6110e42e79d3106866658376b2e48ab9 ]
The code in bfq_check_waker() ignores wake up events from the current waker. This makes it more likely we select a new tentative waker although the current one is generating more wake up events. Treat current waker the same way as any other process and allow it to reset the waker detection logic.
Fixes: 71217df39dc6 ("block, bfq: make waker-queue detection more robust") Signed-off-by: Jan Kara jack@suse.cz Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220519105235.31397-2-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index a2aefb4a1e2e..343ca559ab8a 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -2022,8 +2022,7 @@ static void bfq_check_waker(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, if (!bfqd->last_completed_rq_bfqq || bfqd->last_completed_rq_bfqq == bfqq || bfq_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq) || - now_ns - bfqd->last_completion >= 4 * NSEC_PER_MSEC || - bfqd->last_completed_rq_bfqq == bfqq->waker_bfqq) + now_ns - bfqd->last_completion >= 4 * NSEC_PER_MSEC) return;
if (bfqd->last_completed_rq_bfqq !=