From: Mikulas Patocka mpatocka@redhat.com
commit 7fc2e47f40dd77ab1fcbda6db89614a0173d89c7 upstream.
If the flag SB_FLAG_RECALCULATE is present in the superblock, but it was not specified on the command line (i.e. ic->recalculate_flag is false), dm-integrity would return invalid table line - the reported number of arguments would not match the real number.
Fixes: 468dfca38b1a ("dm integrity: add a bitmap mode") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.2+ Reported-by: Ondrej Kozina okozina@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka mpatocka@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer snitzer@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- drivers/md/dm-integrity.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c @@ -2969,7 +2969,7 @@ static void dm_integrity_status(struct d DMEMIT(" meta_device:%s", ic->meta_dev->name); if (ic->sectors_per_block != 1) DMEMIT(" block_size:%u", ic->sectors_per_block << SECTOR_SHIFT); - if (ic->recalculate_flag) + if (ic->sb->flags & cpu_to_le32(SB_FLAG_RECALCULATING)) DMEMIT(" recalculate"); DMEMIT(" journal_sectors:%u", ic->initial_sectors - SB_SECTORS); DMEMIT(" interleave_sectors:%u", 1U << ic->sb->log2_interleave_sectors);