On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 at 22:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.192 release. There are 135 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 26 Aug 2023 17:05:50 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.192-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
NOTE: 1) LTP syscalls chown02 and fchown02 test failures on NFS mounted filesystem on arm64 Rpi4 will be investigated further.
## Build * kernel: 5.10.191-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: da59b7b5c515edab9a57efd37b031b5b97e6c1cc * git describe: v5.10.190-136-gda59b7b5c515 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.191)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.191)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.191)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.191)
## Test result summary total: 98769, pass: 80650, fail: 1588, skip: 16473, xfail: 58
## Build Summary * arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed * arm: 116 total, 116 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 43 total, 43 passed, 0 failed * i386: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed * mips: 27 total, 26 passed, 1 failed * parisc: 4 total, 0 passed, 4 failed * powerpc: 26 total, 25 passed, 1 failed * riscv: 12 total, 11 passed, 1 failed * s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed * sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * boot * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers-dma-buf * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-exec * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-filesystems-binderfs * kselftest-filesystems-epoll * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-ftrace * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-net-forwarding * kselftest-net-mptcp * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-user_events * kselftest-vDSO * kselftest-vm * kselftest-watchdog * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fsx * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-smoke * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * perf * rcutorture * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org