From: Hangbin Liu liuhangbin@gmail.com
[ Upstream commit 7a1592bcb15d71400a98632727791d1e68ea0ee8 ]
When do tunnel PMTU update and calls __ip6_rt_update_pmtu() in the end, we should not call dst_confirm_neigh() as there is no two-way communication.
v5: No Change. v4: Update commit description v3: Do not remove dst_confirm_neigh, but add a new bool parameter in dst_ops.update_pmtu to control whether we should do neighbor confirm. Also split the big patch to small ones for each area. v2: Remove dst_confirm_neigh in __ip6_rt_update_pmtu.
Fixes: 0dec879f636f ("net: use dst_confirm_neigh for UDP, RAW, ICMP, L2TP") Reviewed-by: Guillaume Nault gnault@redhat.com Tested-by: Guillaume Nault gnault@redhat.com Acked-by: David Ahern dsahern@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu liuhangbin@gmail.com Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c | 2 +- net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ static int tnl_update_pmtu(struct net_de else mtu = skb_dst(skb) ? dst_mtu(skb_dst(skb)) : dev->mtu;
- skb_dst_update_pmtu(skb, mtu); + skb_dst_update_pmtu_no_confirm(skb, mtu);
if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP)) { if (!skb_is_gso(skb) && --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c @@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ ip4ip6_err(struct sk_buff *skb, struct i if (rel_info > dst_mtu(skb_dst(skb2))) goto out;
- skb_dst_update_pmtu(skb2, rel_info); + skb_dst_update_pmtu_no_confirm(skb2, rel_info); }
icmp_send(skb2, rel_type, rel_code, htonl(rel_info)); @@ -1137,7 +1137,7 @@ route_lookup: mtu = max(mtu, skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6) ? IPV6_MIN_MTU : IPV4_MIN_MTU);
- skb_dst_update_pmtu(skb, mtu); + skb_dst_update_pmtu_no_confirm(skb, mtu); if (skb->len - t->tun_hlen - eth_hlen > mtu && !skb_is_gso(skb)) { *pmtu = mtu; err = -EMSGSIZE;