Hello stablers,
With the following revert being backported to stable: a9c859033f6ec Revert "usb: gadget: ffs: Fix BUG when userland exits with submitted AIO transfers"
The original bug it fixed is back. I wonder if we should be backporting the series that seems to quietly fix that issue: fec9095bdef4e usb: dwc3: gadget: remove wait_end_transfer d4f1afe5e896c usb: dwc3: gadget: move requests to cancelled_list d5443bbf5fc8f usb: dwc3: gadget: introduce cancelled_list 7746a8dfb3f9c usb: dwc3: gadget: extract dwc3_gadget_ep_skip_trbs() c3acd59014148 usb: dwc3: gadget: use num_trbs when skipping TRBs on ->dequeue() 09fe1f8d7e2f4 usb: dwc3: gadget: track number of TRBs per request 1a22ec6435806 usb: dwc3: gadget: combine unaligned and zero flags
(Patch 1/8 of the original series was already backported). I know we saw this with 4.19, I'm not sure which other versions it would go into.
I'll re-paste the stack from the original commit that got reverted. I can easily reproduce this by connecting a host when our device is in gadget mode, then attempting to gracefully reboot the system: [ 382.200896] BUG: scheduling while atomic: screen/1808/0x00000100 [ 382.207124] 4 locks held by screen/1808: [ 382.211266] #0: (rcu_callback){....}, at: [<c10b4ff0>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x260/0x440 [ 382.219949] #1: (rcu_read_lock_sched){....}, at: [<c1358ba0>] percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_rcu+0xb0/0x130 [ 382.230034] #2: (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){....}, at: [<c11f0c73>] free_ioctx_users+0x23/0xd0 [ 382.230096] #3: (&(&ffs->eps_lock)->rlock){....}, at: [<f81e7710>] ffs_aio_cancel+0x20/0x60 [usb_f_fs] [ 382.230160] Modules linked in: usb_f_fs libcomposite configfs bnep btsdio bluetooth ecdh_generic brcmfmac brcmutil intel_powerclamp coretemp dwc3 kvm_intel ulpi udc_core kvm irqbypass crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel pcbc dwc3_pci aesni_intel aes_i586 crypto_simd cryptd ehci_pci ehci_hcd gpio_keys usbcore basincove_gpadc industrialio usb_common [ 382.230407] CPU: 1 PID: 1808 Comm: screen Not tainted 4.14.0-edison+ #117 [ 382.230416] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Merrifield/BODEGA BAY, BIOS 542 2015.01.21:18.19.48 [ 382.230425] Call Trace: [ 382.230438] <SOFTIRQ> [ 382.230466] dump_stack+0x47/0x62 [ 382.230498] __schedule_bug+0x61/0x80 [ 382.230522] __schedule+0x43/0x7a0 [ 382.230587] schedule+0x5f/0x70 [ 382.230625] dwc3_gadget_ep_dequeue+0x14c/0x270 [dwc3] [ 382.230669] ? do_wait_intr_irq+0x70/0x70 [ 382.230724] usb_ep_dequeue+0x19/0x90 [udc_core] [ 382.230770] ffs_aio_cancel+0x37/0x60 [usb_f_fs] [ 382.230798] kiocb_cancel+0x31/0x40 [ 382.230822] free_ioctx_users+0x4d/0xd0 [ 382.230858] percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_rcu+0x10a/0x130 [ 382.230881] ? percpu_ref_exit+0x40/0x40 [ 382.230904] rcu_process_callbacks+0x2b3/0x440 [ 382.230965] __do_softirq+0xf8/0x26b [ 382.231011] ? __softirqentry_text_start+0x8/0x8 [ 382.231033] do_softirq_own_stack+0x22/0x30 [ 382.231042] </SOFTIRQ> [ 382.231071] irq_exit+0x45/0xc0 [ 382.231089] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x13c/0x150 [ 382.231118] apic_timer_interrupt+0x35/0x3c
Felipe/others, any thoughts about this? -Evan