4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit aef027db48da56b6f25d0e54c07c8401ada6ce21 ]
The virtio-rng driver uses a completion called have_data to wait for a virtio read to be fulfilled by the hypervisor. The completion is reset before placing a buffer on the virtio queue and completed by the virtio callback once data has been written into the buffer.
Prior to this commit, the driver called init_completion on this completion both during probe as well as when registering virtio buffers as part of a hwrng read operation. The second of these init_completion calls should instead be reinit_completion because the have_data completion has already been inited by probe. As described in Documentation/scheduler/completion.txt, "Calling init_completion() twice on the same completion object is most likely a bug".
This bug was present in the initial implementation of virtio-rng in f7f510ec1957 ("virtio: An entropy device, as suggested by hpa"). Back then the have_data completion was a single static completion rather than a member of one of potentially multiple virtrng_info structs as implemented later by 08e53fbdb85c ("virtio-rng: support multiple virtio-rng devices"). The original driver incorrectly used init_completion rather than INIT_COMPLETION to reset have_data during read.
Tested by running `head -c48 /dev/random | hexdump` within crosvm, the Chrome OS virtual machine monitor, and confirming that the virtio-rng driver successfully produces random bytes from the host.
Signed-off-by: David Tolnay dtolnay@gmail.com Tested-by: David Tolnay dtolnay@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c index b89df66ea1ae..7abd604e938c 100644 --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static int virtio_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *buf, size_t size, bool wait)
if (!vi->busy) { vi->busy = true; - init_completion(&vi->have_data); + reinit_completion(&vi->have_data); register_buffer(vi, buf, size); }