From: He Fengqing hefengqing@huawei.com
[ Upstream commit 75f0fc7b48ad45a2e5736bcf8de26c8872fe8695 ]
In bpf_patch_insn_data(), we first use the bpf_patch_insn_single() to insert new instructions, then use adjust_insn_aux_data() to adjust insn_aux_data. If the old env->prog have no enough room for new inserted instructions, we use bpf_prog_realloc to construct new_prog and free the old env->prog.
There have two errors here. First, if adjust_insn_aux_data() return ENOMEM, we should free the new_prog. Second, if adjust_insn_aux_data() return ENOMEM, bpf_patch_insn_data() will return NULL, and env->prog has been freed in bpf_prog_realloc, but we will use it in bpf_check().
So in this patch, we make the adjust_insn_aux_data() never fails. In bpf_patch_insn_data(), we first pre-malloc memory for the new insn_aux_data, then call bpf_patch_insn_single() to insert new instructions, at last call adjust_insn_aux_data() to adjust insn_aux_data.
Fixes: 8041902dae52 ("bpf: adjust insn_aux_data when patching insns") Signed-off-by: He Fengqing hefengqing@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Acked-by: Song Liu songliubraving@fb.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210714101815.164322-1-hefengqing@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 49f07e2bf23b..10084c0600dd 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -11414,10 +11414,11 @@ static void convert_pseudo_ld_imm64(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) * insni[off, off + cnt). Adjust corresponding insn_aux_data by copying * [0, off) and [off, end) to new locations, so the patched range stays zero */ -static int adjust_insn_aux_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, - struct bpf_prog *new_prog, u32 off, u32 cnt) +static void adjust_insn_aux_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_insn_aux_data *new_data, + struct bpf_prog *new_prog, u32 off, u32 cnt) { - struct bpf_insn_aux_data *new_data, *old_data = env->insn_aux_data; + struct bpf_insn_aux_data *old_data = env->insn_aux_data; struct bpf_insn *insn = new_prog->insnsi; u32 old_seen = old_data[off].seen; u32 prog_len; @@ -11430,12 +11431,9 @@ static int adjust_insn_aux_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, old_data[off].zext_dst = insn_has_def32(env, insn + off + cnt - 1);
if (cnt == 1) - return 0; + return; prog_len = new_prog->len; - new_data = vzalloc(array_size(prog_len, - sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data))); - if (!new_data) - return -ENOMEM; + memcpy(new_data, old_data, sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * off); memcpy(new_data + off + cnt - 1, old_data + off, sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * (prog_len - off - cnt + 1)); @@ -11446,7 +11444,6 @@ static int adjust_insn_aux_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } env->insn_aux_data = new_data; vfree(old_data); - return 0; }
static void adjust_subprog_starts(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 off, u32 len) @@ -11481,6 +11478,14 @@ static struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 of const struct bpf_insn *patch, u32 len) { struct bpf_prog *new_prog; + struct bpf_insn_aux_data *new_data = NULL; + + if (len > 1) { + new_data = vzalloc(array_size(env->prog->len + len - 1, + sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data))); + if (!new_data) + return NULL; + }
new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_single(env->prog, off, patch, len); if (IS_ERR(new_prog)) { @@ -11488,10 +11493,10 @@ static struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 of verbose(env, "insn %d cannot be patched due to 16-bit range\n", env->insn_aux_data[off].orig_idx); + vfree(new_data); return NULL; } - if (adjust_insn_aux_data(env, new_prog, off, len)) - return NULL; + adjust_insn_aux_data(env, new_data, new_prog, off, len); adjust_subprog_starts(env, off, len); adjust_poke_descs(new_prog, off, len); return new_prog;